Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Domenico Dato

dblp:71/2375 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-3444-2785ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.822022
The Istella22 Dataset: Bridging Traditional and Neural Learning to Rank Evaluation · SIGIR 2022
Fast Ranking with Additive Ensembles of Oblivious and Non-Oblivious Regression Trees · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2016
Information retrieval › ranking › learning to rank
neural learning to rank
0.612022
The Istella22 Dataset: Bridging Traditional and Neural Learning to Rank Evaluation · SIGIR 2022
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark dataset
0.212022
The Istella22 Dataset: Bridging Traditional and Neural Learning to Rank Evaluation · SIGIR 2022
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.212022
The Istella22 Dataset: Bridging Traditional and Neural Learning to Rank Evaluation · SIGIR 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transfer ranking · 0.6pre-trained language model · 0.6feature-based learning to rank · 0.6oblivious trees · 0.2cache-efficient tree ensemble representation · 0.2bitwise operations · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 The Istella22 Dataset: Bridging Traditional and Neural Learning to Rank Evaluation
abstract
Neural approaches that use pre-trained language models are effective at various ranking tasks, such as question answering and ad-hoc document ranking. However, their effectiveness compared to feature-based Learning-to-Rank (LtR) methods has not yet been well-established. A major reason for this is because present LtR benchmarks that contain query-document feature vectors do not contain the raw query and document text needed for neural models. On the other hand, the benchmarks often used for evaluating neural models, e.g., MS MARCO, TREC Robust, etc., provide text but do not provide query-document feature vectors. In this paper, we present Istella22, a new dataset that enables such comparisons by providing both query/document text and strong query-document feature vectors used by an industrial search engine. The dataset consists of a comprehensive corpus of 8.4M web documents, a collection of query-document pairs including 220 hand-crafted features, relevance judgments on a 5-graded scale, and a set of 2,198 textual queries used for testing purposes. Istella22 enables a fair evaluation of traditional learning-to-rank and transfer ranking techniques on the same data. LtR models exploit the feature-based representations of training samples while pre-trained transformer-based neural rankers can be evaluated on the corresponding textual content of queries and documents. Through preliminary experiments on Istella22, we find that neural re-ranking approaches lag behind LtR models in terms of effectiveness. However, LtR models identify the scores from neural models as strong signals.
Domenico Dato, Sean MacAvaney, Franco Maria Nardini, Raffaele Perego 0001, Nicola Tonellotto
SIGIR1
2016 Fast Ranking with Additive Ensembles of Oblivious and Non-Oblivious Regression Trees
abstract
Learning-to-Rank models based on additive ensembles of regression trees have been proven to be very effective for scoring query results returned by large-scale Web search engines. Unfortunately, the computational cost of scoring thousands of candidate documents by traversing large ensembles of trees is high. Thus, several works have investigated solutions aimed at improving the efficiency of document scoring by exploiting advanced features of modern CPUs and memory hierarchies. In this article, we present Q uick S corer , a new algorithm that adopts a novel cache-efficient representation of a given tree ensemble, performs an interleaved traversal by means of fast bitwise operations, and supports ensembles of oblivious trees. An extensive and detailed test assessment is conducted on two standard Learning-to-Rank datasets and on a novel very large dataset we made publicly available for conducting significant efficiency tests. The experiments show unprecedented speedups over the best state-of-the-art baselines ranging from 1.9 × to 6.6 × . The analysis of low-level profiling traces shows that Q uick S corer efficiency is due to its cache-aware approach in terms of both data layout and access patterns and to a control flow that entails very low branch mis-prediction rates.
Domenico Dato, Claudio Lucchese, Franco Maria Nardini, Salvatore Orlando 0001, Raffaele Perego 0001, Nicola Tonellotto, Rossano Venturini
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.1