Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Baris E. Suzek
dblp:71/2606
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-1521-4306ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 8 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
functional annotation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | UniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequence similarity search |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | UniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A fast Peptide Match service for UniProt Knowledgebase · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
identifier mapping |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A comprehensive protein-centric ID mapping service for molecular data integration · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein sequence analysis
protein sequence clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | UniRef: comprehensive and non-redundant UniProt reference clusters · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration
database integration |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | A comprehensive protein-centric ID mapping service for molecular data integration · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
gene prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | A probabilistic method for identifying start codons in bacterial genomes · Bioinform. 2001 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
translation initiation site prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | A probabilistic method for identifying start codons in bacterial genomes · Bioinform. 2001 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequence database redundancy reduction |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | UniRef: comprehensive and non-redundant UniProt reference clusters · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation › prokaryotic genome annotation
bacterial genome annotation |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | A probabilistic method for identifying start codons in bacterial genomes · Bioinform. 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bootstrap analysis · 0.2BLASTP · 0.2text search engine · 0.2web services · 0.1sequence identity clustering · 0.1probabilistic modeling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | UniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searchesabstractAbstract Motivation: UniRef databases provide full-scale clustering of UniProtKB sequences and are utilized for a broad range of applications, particularly similarity-based functional annotation. Non-redundancy and intra-cluster homogeneity in UniRef were recently improved by adding a sequence length overlap threshold. Our hypothesis is that these improvements would enhance the speed and sensitivity of similarity searches and improve the consistency of annotation within clusters. Results: Intra-cluster molecular function consistency was examined by analysis of Gene Ontology terms. Results show that UniRef clusters bring together proteins of identical molecular function in more than 97% of the clusters, implying that clusters are useful for annotation and can also be used to detect annotation inconsistencies. To examine coverage in similarity results, BLASTP searches against UniRef50 followed by expansion of the hit lists with cluster members demonstrated advantages compared with searches against UniProtKB sequences; the searches are concise (∼7 times shorter hit list before expansion), faster (∼6 times) and more sensitive in detection of remote similarities (>96% recall at e-value <0.0001). Our results support the use of UniRef clusters as a comprehensive and scalable alternative to native sequence databases for similarity searches and reinforces its reliability for use in functional annotation. Availability and implementation: Web access and file download from UniProt website at http://www.uniprot.org/uniref and ftp://ftp.uniprot.org/pub/databases/uniprot/uniref. BLAST searches against UniRef are available at http://www.uniprot.org/blast/ Contact: [email protected] Baris E. Suzek, Hongzhan Huang, Peter B. McGarvey, Cathy H. Wu |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2013 | A fast Peptide Match service for UniProt KnowledgebaseabstractSUMMARY: We have developed a new web application for peptide matching using Apache Lucene-based search engine. The Peptide Match service is designed to quickly retrieve all occurrences of a given query peptide from UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) with isoforms. The matched proteins are shown in summary tables with rich annotations, including matched sequence region(s) and links to corresponding proteins in a number of proteomic/peptide spectral databases. The results are grouped by taxonomy and can be browsed by organism, taxonomic group or taxonomy tree. The service supports queries where isobaric leucine and isoleucine are treated equivalent, and an option for searching UniRef100 representative sequences, as well as dynamic queries to major proteomic databases. In addition to the web interface, we also provide RESTful web services. The underlying data are updated every 4 weeks in accordance with the UniProt releases. AVAILABILITY: http://proteininformationresource.org/peptide.shtml. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Chuming Chen, Hongzhan Huang, Baris E. Suzek, Cathy H. Wu |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2012 | Life sciences domain analysis modelabstractOBJECTIVE: Meaningful exchange of information is a fundamental challenge in collaborative biomedical research. To help address this, the authors developed the Life Sciences Domain Analysis Model (LS DAM), an information model that provides a framework for communication among domain experts and technical teams developing information systems to support biomedical research. The LS DAM is harmonized with the Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group (BRIDG) model of protocol-driven clinical research. Together, these models can facilitate data exchange for translational research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The content of the LS DAM was driven by analysis of life sciences and translational research scenarios and the concepts in the model are derived from existing information models, reference models and data exchange formats. The model is represented in the Unified Modeling Language and uses ISO 21090 data types. RESULTS: The LS DAM v2.2.1 is comprised of 130 classes and covers several core areas including Experiment, Molecular Biology, Molecular Databases and Specimen. Nearly half of these classes originate from the BRIDG model, emphasizing the semantic harmonization between these models. Validation of the LS DAM against independently derived information models, research scenarios and reference databases supports its general applicability to represent life sciences research. DISCUSSION: The LS DAM provides unambiguous definitions for concepts required to describe life sciences research. The processes established to achieve consensus among domain experts will be applied in future iterations and may be broadly applicable to other standardization efforts. CONCLUSIONS: The LS DAM provides common semantics for life sciences research. Through harmonization with BRIDG, it promotes interoperability in translational science. Robert R. Freimuth, Elaine T. Freund, Lisa Schick, Mukesh K. Sharma, Grace A. Stafford, Baris E. Suzek, Joyce Hernandez, Jason Hipp, Jenny M. Kelley, Konrad Rokicki, Sue Pan, Andrew J. Buckler, Todd H. Stokes, Anna T. Fernandez, Ian Fore, Kenneth H. Buetow, Juli D. Klemm |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 6 |
| 2012 | Informatics and data quality at collaborative multicenter Breast and Colon Cancer Family RegistriesabstractQuality control and harmonization of data is a vital and challenging undertaking for any successful data coordination center and a responsibility shared between the multiple sites that produce, integrate, and utilize the data. Here we describe a coordinated effort between scientists and data managers in the Cancer Family Registries to implement a data governance infrastructure consisting of both organizational and technical solutions. The technical solution uses a rule-based validation system that facilitates error detection and correction for data centers submitting data to a central informatics database. Validation rules comprise both standard checks on allowable values and a crosscheck of related database elements for logical and scientific consistency. Evaluation over a 2-year timeframe showed a significant decrease in the number of errors in the database and a concurrent increase in data consistency and accuracy. Peter B. McGarvey, Sweta Ladwa, Mauricio Oberti, Anca Dana Dragomir, Erin K. Hedlund, David M. Tanenbaum, Baris E. Suzek, Subha Madhavan |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 7 |
| 2011 | A comprehensive protein-centric ID mapping service for molecular data integrationabstractMOTIVATION: Identifier (ID) mapping establishes links between various biological databases and is an essential first step for molecular data integration and functional annotation. ID mapping allows diverse molecular data on genes and proteins to be combined and mapped to functional pathways and ontologies. We have developed comprehensive protein-centric ID mapping services providing mappings for 90 IDs derived from databases on genes, proteins, pathways, diseases, structures, protein families, protein interaction, literature, ontologies, etc. The services are widely used and have been regularly updated since 2006. AVAILABILITY: www.uniprot.org/mappingandproteininformation-resource.org/pirwww/search/idmapping.shtml CONTACT: [email protected]. Hongzhan Huang, Peter B. McGarvey, Baris E. Suzek, Raja Mazumder, Jian Zhang 0051, Yongxing Chen, Cathy H. Wu |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2009 | Infrastructure for the life sciences: design and implementation of the UniProt websiteabstractBACKGROUND: The UniProt consortium was formed in 2002 by groups from the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB), the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) and the Protein Information Resource (PIR) at Georgetown University, and soon afterwards the website http://www.uniprot.org was set up as a central entry point to UniProt resources. Requests to this address were redirected to one of the three organisations' websites. While these sites shared a set of static pages with general information about UniProt, their pages for searching and viewing data were different. To provide users with a consistent view and to cut the cost of maintaining three separate sites, the consortium decided to develop a common website for UniProt. Following several years of intense development and a year of public beta testing, the http://www.uniprot.org domain was switched to the newly developed site described in this paper in July 2008. DESCRIPTION: The UniProt consortium is the main provider of protein sequence and annotation data for much of the life sciences community. The http://www.uniprot.org website is the primary access point to this data and to documentation and basic tools for the data. These tools include full text and field-based text search, similarity search, multiple sequence alignment, batch retrieval and database identifier mapping. This paper discusses the design and implementation of the new website, which was released in July 2008, and shows how it improves data access for users with different levels of experience, as well as to machines for programmatic access.http://www.uniprot.org/ is open for both academic and commercial use. The site was built with open source tools and libraries. Feedback is very welcome and should be sent to [email protected]. CONCLUSION: The new UniProt website makes accessing and understanding UniProt easier than ever. The two main lessons learned are that getting the basics right for such a data provider website has huge benefits, but is not trivial and easy to underestimate, and that there is no substitute for using empirical data throughout the development process to decide on what is and what is not working for your users. Eric Jain, Amos Bairoch, Severine Duvaud, Isabelle Phan, Nicole Redaschi, Baris E. Suzek, Maria Jesus Martin, Peter B. McGarvey, Elisabeth Gasteiger |
BMC Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2008 | Orchestrating caGrid Services in TavernaabstractcaBIGtrade (the cancer Biomedical Informatics Gridtrade) is an open-source, open-access information network enabling cancer researchers to share tools, data, applications, and technologies. caGrid is the underlying service-based grid software infrastructure for caBIG, integrating distributed data and analytic resources into a virtual collaborative platform for cancer research. Within caGrid, many cancer-related data analysis and aggregation tasks can make use of "canned" sets of service invocations, or workflows. As a result, there is a need to orchestrate the invocation of caGrid services through the use of both a workflow language and tooling. In this paper, we first explain why we select Taverna as a candidate for workflow authoring and invocation. We then review the development of Taverna plug-ins in general, and describe how we extend Taverna to use caGrid services. We then detail a real-world example and the lessons learned from our research. Finally we conclude with a summary and a description of potential next steps. Wei Tan 0001, Ravi K. Madduri, Kiran Keshav, Baris E. Suzek, Scott Oster, Ian T. Foster |
ICWS | 4 |
| 2007 | UniRef: comprehensive and non-redundant UniProt reference clustersabstractMOTIVATION: Redundant protein sequences in biological databases hinder sequence similarity searches and make interpretation of search results difficult. Clustering of protein sequence space based on sequence similarity helps organize all sequences into manageable datasets and reduces sampling bias and overrepresentation of sequences. RESULTS: The UniRef (UniProt Reference Clusters) provide clustered sets of sequences from the UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) and selected UniProt Archive records to obtain complete coverage of sequence space at several resolutions while hiding redundant sequences. Currently covering >4 million source sequences, the UniRef100 database combines identical sequences and subfragments from any source organism into a single UniRef entry. UniRef90 and UniRef50 are built by clustering UniRef100 sequences at the 90 or 50% sequence identity levels. UniRef100, UniRef90 and UniRef50 yield a database size reduction of approximately 10, 40 and 70%, respectively, from the source sequence set. The reduced redundancy increases the speed of similarity searches and improves detection of distant relationships. UniRef entries contain summary cluster and membership information, including the sequence of a representative protein, member count and common taxonomy of the cluster, the accession numbers of all the merged entries and links to rich functional annotation in UniProtKB to facilitate biological discovery. UniRef has already been applied to broad research areas ranging from genome annotation to proteomics data analysis. AVAILABILITY: UniRef is updated biweekly and is available for online search and retrieval at http://www.uniprot.org, as well as for download at ftp://ftp.uniprot.org/pub/databases/uniprot/uniref. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Baris E. Suzek, Hongzhan Huang, Peter B. McGarvey, Raja Mazumder, Cathy H. Wu |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2001 | A probabilistic method for identifying start codons in bacterial genomesabstractAs the pace of genome sequencing has accelerated, the need for highly accurate gene prediction systems has grown. Computational systems for identifying genes in prokaryotic genomes have sensitivities of 98-99% or higher (Delcher et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 4636-4641, 1999). These accuracy figures are calculated by comparing the locations of verified stop codons to the predictions. Determining the accuracy of start codon prediction is more problematic, however, due to the relatively small number of start sites that have been confirmed by independent, non-computational methods. Nonetheless, the accuracy of gene finders at predicting the exact gene boundaries at both the 5' and 3' ends of genes is of critical importance for microbial genome annotation, especially in light of the important signaling information that is sometimes found on the 5' end of a protein coding region. In this paper we propose a probabilistic method to improve the accuracy of gene identification systems at finding precise translation start sites. The new system, RBSfinder, is tested on a validated set of genes from Escherichia coli, for which it improves the accuracy of start site locations predicted by computational gene finding systems from the range 67-77% to 90% correct. Baris E. Suzek, Maria D. Ermolaeva, Mark J. Schreiber, Steven Salzberg |
Bioinform. | 1 |