Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Angel Calderón

dblp:71/3412 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 72% Electronic design automation · 17% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 11%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
markov models
0.021996
Efficient Exploration of Availability Models Guided by Failure Distances · SIGMETRICS 1996
Regenerative Randomization: Theory and Application Examples · SIGMETRICS 1995
Performance modeling and evaluation
state space exploration
0.011996
Efficient Exploration of Availability Models Guided by Failure Distances · SIGMETRICS 1996
Performance modeling and evaluation
randomization
0.011995
Regenerative Randomization: Theory and Application Examples · SIGMETRICS 1995
Electronic design automation › circuit simulation
transient analysis
0.011995
Regenerative Randomization: Theory and Application Examples · SIGMETRICS 1995
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
dependability analysis
0.021996
Efficient Exploration of Availability Models Guided by Failure Distances · SIGMETRICS 1996
Regenerative Randomization: Theory and Application Examples · SIGMETRICS 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

state space exploration · 0.0bounding · 0.0numerical solution · 0.0markov chain · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Efficient Exploration of Availability Models Guided by Failure Distances
abstract
Recently, a method to bound the steady-state availability using the failure distance concept has been proposed. In this paper we refine that method by introducing state space exploration techniques. In the methods proposed here, the state space is incrementally generated based on the contributions to the steady-state availability band of the states in the frontier of the currently generated state space. Several state space exploration algorithms are evaluated in terms of bounds quality and memory and CPU time requirements. The more efficient seems to be a waved algorithm which expands transition groups. We compare our new methods with the method based on the failure distance concept without state exploration and a method proposed by Souza e Silva and Ochoa which uses state space exploration but does not use the failure distance concept. Using typical examples we show that the methods proposed here can be significantly more efficient than any of the previous methods.
Juan A. Carrasco, Javier Escribá, Angel Calderón
SIGMETRICS3
1995 Regenerative Randomization: Theory and Application Examples
abstract
Randomization is a popular method for the transient solution of continuous-time Markov models. Its primary advantages over other methods (i.e., ODE solvers) are robustness and ease of implementation. It is however well-known that the performance of the method deteriorates with the "stiffness" of the model: the number of required steps to solve the model up to time t tends to Λt for Λt → ∞. In this paper we present a new method called regenerative randomization and apply it to the computation of two transient measures for rewarded irreducible Markov models. Regarding the number of steps required in regenerative randomization we prove that: 1) it is smaller than the number of steps required in standard randomization when the initial distribution is concentrated in a single state, 2) for Λt → ∞, it is upper bounded by a function O(log(Λt/ε)), where ε is the desired relative approximation error bound. Using dependability and performability examples we analyze the performance of the method.
Juan A. Carrasco, Angel Calderón
SIGMETRICS2