EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Manal Habbouche
dblp:71/406
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › ontology
ontology development |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Evaluation of ontology development tools for bioinformatics · Bioinform. 2003 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › knowledge representation in biology › biomedical ontology
gene ontology |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Evaluation of ontology development tools for bioinformatics · Bioinform. 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tool comparison · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | Evaluation of ontology development tools for bioinformaticsabstractOntologies are being used nowadays in many areas, including bioinformatics. To assist users in developing and maintaining ontologies a number of tools have been developed. In this paper we compare four such tools, Protégé-2000, Chimaera, DAG-Edit and OilEd. As test ontologies we have used ontologies from the Gene Ontology Consortium. No system is preferred in all situations, but each system has its own strengths and weaknesses. Patrick Lambrix, Manal Habbouche, Marta Pérez |
Bioinform. | 2 |