Drew S. Roselli

dblp:71/428 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
5 papers
Storage systems · 67% Performance modeling and evaluation · 17% Distributed systems · 11%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Software maintenance and evolution · 95% Operating systems · 5%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems
file systems
0.132000
A Comparison of File System Workloads · USENIX ATC, General Track 2000
Self-Similarity in File Systems · SIGMETRICS 1998
Improving the Performance of Log-Structured File Systems with Adaptive Methods · SOSP 1997
Storage systems › file systems
file system workload
0.022000
A Comparison of File System Workloads · USENIX ATC, General Track 2000
Self-Similarity in File Systems · SIGMETRICS 1998
Storage systems › file systems › distributed file system
network file system
0.021996
Serverless Network File Systems · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 1996
Serverless Network File Systems · SOSP 1995
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.022000
Self-Similarity in File Systems · SIGMETRICS 1998
A Comparison of File System Workloads · USENIX ATC, General Track 2000
Performance modeling and evaluation › workload characterization
self-similar traffic
0.011998
Self-Similarity in File Systems · SIGMETRICS 1998
Storage systems › file systems
distributed file system
0.021996
Serverless Network File Systems · SOSP 1995
Serverless Network File Systems · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 1996
Storage systems › file systems
file system performance
0.011997
Improving the Performance of Log-Structured File Systems with Adaptive Methods · SOSP 1997
Storage systems › file systems › write-optimized file system
log-structured file system
0.011997
Improving the Performance of Log-Structured File Systems with Adaptive Methods · SOSP 1997
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.011996
Serverless Network File Systems · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 1996
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
high availability
0.011996
Serverless Network File Systems · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 1996
Cloud and datacenter computing
serverless computing
0.011996
Serverless Network File Systems · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 1996
Operating systems › resource management › storage management
file systems
0.011997
Improving the Performance of Log-Structured File Systems with Adaptive Methods · SOSP 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

adaptive methods · 0.0workload comparison · 0.0trace analysis · 0.0hurst parameter estimation · 0.0ON/OFF source model · 0.0redundant data storage · 0.0peer-to-peer cooperation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Model Governance: Reducing the Anarchy of Production ML
Vinay Sridhar, Sriram Subramanian, Dulcardo Arteaga, Swaminathan Sundararaman, Drew S. Roselli, Nisha Talagala
USENIX ATC5
2000 A Comparison of File System Workloads
Drew S. Roselli, Jacob R. Lorch, Thomas E. Anderson
USENIX ATC, General Track1
1998 Self-Similarity in File Systems
abstract
We demonstrate that high-level file system events exhibit self-similar behaviour, but only for short-term time scales of approximately under a day. We do so through the analysis of four sets of traces that span time scales of milliseconds through months, and that differ in the trace collection method, the filesystems being traced, and the chronological times of the tracing. Two sets of detailed, short-term file system trace data are analyzed; both are shown to have self-similar like behaviour, with consistent Hurst parameters (a measure of self-similarity) for all file system traffic as well as individual classes of file system events. Long-term file system trace data is then analyzed, and we discover that the traces' high variability and self-similar behaviour does not persist across time scales of days, weeks, and months. Using the short-term trace data, we show that sources of file system traffic exhibit ON/OFF source behaviour, which is characterized by highly variably lengthed bursts of activity, followed by similarly variably lengthed periods of inactivity. This ON/OFF behaviour is used to motivate a simple technique for synthesizing a stream of events that exhibit the same self-similar short-term behaviour as was observed in the file system traces.
Steve D. Gribble, Gurmeet Singh Manku, Drew S. Roselli, Eric A. Brewer, Timothy J. Gibson, Ethan L. Miller
SIGMETRICS3
1997 Improving the Performance of Log-Structured File Systems with Adaptive Methods
abstract
Article Free Access Share on Improving the performance of log-structured file systems with adaptive methods Authors: Jeanna Neefe Matthews Computer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley Computer Science Division, University of California, BerkeleyView Profile , Drew Roselli Computer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley Computer Science Division, University of California, BerkeleyView Profile , Adam M. Costello Computer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley Computer Science Division, University of California, BerkeleyView Profile , Randolph Y. Wang Computer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley Computer Science Division, University of California, BerkeleyView Profile , Thomas E. Anderson Computer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley Computer Science Division, University of California, BerkeleyView Profile Authors Info & Claims SOSP '97: Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principlesOctober 1997Pages 238–251https://doi.org/10.1145/268998.266700Published:01 October 1997Publication History 102citation1,857DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations102Total Downloads1,857Last 12 Months115Last 6 weeks19 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Publisher SiteeReaderPDF
Jeanna Matthews, Drew S. Roselli, Adam M. Costello, Randolph Y. Wang, Thomas E. Anderson
SOSP2
1996 Serverless Network File Systems
abstract
We propose a new paradigm for network file system design:serverless network file systems. While traditional network file systems rely on a central server machine, a serverless system utilizes workstations cooperating as peers to provide all file system services. Any machine in the system can store, cache, or control any block of data. Our approach uses this location independence, in combination with fast local area networks, to provide better performance and scalability than traditional file systems. Furthermore, because any machine in the system can assume the responsibilities of a failed component, our serverless design also provides high availability via redundatn data storage. To demonstrate our approach, we have implemented a prototype serverless network file system called xFS. Preliminary performance measurements suggest that our architecture achieves its goal of scalability. For instance, in a 32-node xFS system with 32 active clients, each client receives nearly as much read or write throughput as it would see if it were the only active client.
Thomas E. Anderson, Michael Dahlin, Jeanna Matthews, David A. Patterson 0001, Drew S. Roselli, Randolph Y. Wang
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst.5
1995 Serverless Network File Systems
abstract
Article Serverless network file systems Share on Authors: T. E. Anderson Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley Computer Science Division, University of California at BerkeleyView Profile , M. D. Dahlin Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley Computer Science Division, University of California at BerkeleyView Profile , J. M. Neefe Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley Computer Science Division, University of California at BerkeleyView Profile , D. A. Patterson Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley Computer Science Division, University of California at BerkeleyView Profile , D. S. Roselli Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley Computer Science Division, University of California at BerkeleyView Profile , R. Y. Wang Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley Computer Science Division, University of California at BerkeleyView Profile Authors Info & Claims SOSP '95: Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principlesDecember 1995 Pages 109–126https://doi.org/10.1145/224056.224066Online:03 December 1995Publication History 255citation3,156DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations255Total Downloads3,156Last 12 Months71Last 6 weeks6 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access
Thomas E. Anderson, Michael Dahlin, Jeanna Matthews, David A. Patterson 0001, Drew S. Roselli, Randolph Y. Wang
SOSP5