Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Van-Bao Ly
dblp:71/5989
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Biometric security · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Biometric security
biometric database |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | The Multiscenario Multienvironment BioSecure Multimodal Database (BMDB) · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010 |
Biometric security
biometric recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | The Multiscenario Multienvironment BioSecure Multimodal Database (BMDB) · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010 |
Biometric security › multi-biometric systems
multimodal biometrics |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | The Multiscenario Multienvironment BioSecure Multimodal Database (BMDB) · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multimodal fusion · 0.1baseline evaluation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | The Multiscenario Multienvironment BioSecure Multimodal Database (BMDB)abstractA new multimodal biometric database designed and acquired within the framework of the European BioSecure Network of Excellence is presented. It is comprised of more than 600 individuals acquired simultaneously in three scenarios: 1) over the Internet, 2) in an office environment with desktop PC, and 3) in indoor/outdoor environments with mobile portable hardware. The three scenarios include a common part of audio/video data. Also, signature and fingerprint data have been acquired both with desktop PC and mobile portable hardware. Additionally, hand and iris data were acquired in the second scenario using desktop PC. Acquisition has been conducted by 11 European institutions. Additional features of the BioSecure Multimodal Database (BMDB) are: two acquisition sessions, several sensors in certain modalities, balanced gender and age distributions, multimodal realistic scenarios with simple and quick tasks per modality, cross-European diversity, availability of demographic data, and compatibility with other multimodal databases. The novel acquisition conditions of the BMDB allow us to perform new challenging research and evaluation of either monomodal or multimodal biometric systems, as in the recent BioSecure Multimodal Evaluation campaign. A description of this campaign including baseline results of individual modalities from the new database is also given. The database is expected to be available for research purposes through the BioSecure Association during 2008. Javier Ortega-Garcia, Julian Fierrez, Fernando Alonso-Fernandez, Javier Galbally, Manuel R. Freire, Joaquín González-Rodríguez, Carmen García-Mateo, José Luis Alba-Castro, Elisardo González-Agulla, Enrique Otero Muras, Sonia Garcia-Salicetti, Lorène Allano, Van-Bao Ly, Bernadette Dorizzi, Josef Kittler, Thirimachos Bourlai, Norman Poh, Farzin Deravi, Ming W. R. Ng, Michael C. Fairhurst, Jean Hennebert, Andreas Humm, Massimo Tistarelli, Linda Brodo, Jonas Richiardi, Andrzej Drygajlo, Harald Ganster, Federico Sukno, Sri-Kaushik Pavani, Alejandro F. Frangi, Lale Akarun, Arman Savran |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 13 |
| 2007 | On Using the Viterbi Path Along With HMM Likelihood Information for Online Signature VerificationabstractThis paper describes a system using two complementary sorts of information issuing from a hidden Markov model (HMM) for online signature verification. At each point of the signature, 25 features are extracted. These features are normalized before training and testing in order to improve the performance of the system. This normalization is writer-dependent; it exploits only five genuine signatures used to train the writer HMM. A claimed identity is confirmed when the arithmetic mean of two similarity scores, obtained on an input signature, is higher than a threshold. The first score is related to the likelihood given by the HMM of the claimed identity; the second score is related to the segmentation given by such an HMM on the input signature. A personalized score normalization is also proposed before fusion. Our approach is evaluated on several online signature databases, such as BIOMET, PHILIPS, MCYT, and SVC2004, which were captured under different acquisition conditions. For the first time in signature verification, we show that the fusion of segmentation-based information generated by the HMM with likelihood-based information considerably improves the quality of the verification system. Finally, owing to our two-stage normalization (at the feature and score levels), we show that our system results in more stable client-score distributions across databases and in a better separation between the distributions of client and impostor scores. Van-Bao Ly, Sonia Garcia-Salicetti, Bernadette Dorizzi |
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B | 1 |