Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joseph P. Turian
dblp:71/635
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Vision and language · 45% Motion planning and robot control · 13% Representation and self-supervised learning · 11% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automata and formal languages · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding
language grounding |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Experience Grounds Language · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
embodied cognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Experience Grounds Language · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Word Representations: A Simple and General Method for Semi-Supervised Learning · ACL 2010 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
word representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Word Representations: A Simple and General Method for Semi-Supervised Learning · ACL 2010 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › acoustic model training
discriminative training |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Scalable Discriminative Learning for Natural Language Parsing and Translation · NIPS 2006 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Scalable Discriminative Learning for Natural Language Parsing and Translation · NIPS 2006 |
Automata and formal languages › parsing
constituency parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Advances in Discriminative Parsing · ACL 2006 |
Automata and formal languages
parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Advances in Discriminative Parsing · ACL 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
position paper · 0.4feature selection · 0.1word embeddings · 0.1discriminative training · 0.1discriminative learning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Experience Grounds LanguageabstractYonatan Bisk, Ari Holtzman, Jesse Thomason, Jacob Andreas, Yoshua Bengio, Joyce Chai, Mirella Lapata, Angeliki Lazaridou, Jonathan May, Aleksandr Nisnevich, Nicolas Pinto, Joseph Turian. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020. Yonatan Bisk, Ari Holtzman, Jesse Thomason, Jacob Andreas, Yoshua Bengio, Joyce Y. Chai, Mirella Lapata, Angeliki Lazaridou, Jonathan May, Aleksandr Nisnevich, Nicolas Pinto, Joseph P. Turian |
EMNLP (1) | 12 |
| 2010 | Word Representations: A Simple and General Method for Semi-Supervised Learning
Joseph P. Turian, Lev-Arie Ratinov, Yoshua Bengio |
ACL | 1 |
| 2010 | Tractable Multivariate Binary Density Estimation and the Restricted Boltzmann ForestabstractWe investigate the problem of estimating the density function of multivariate binary data. In particular, we focus on models for which computing the estimated probability of any data point is tractable. In such a setting, previous work has mostly concentrated on mixture modeling approaches. We argue that for the problem of tractable density estimation, the restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM) provides a competitive framework for multivariate binary density modeling. With this in mind, we also generalize the RBM framework and present the restricted Boltzmann forest (RBForest), which replaces the binary variables in the hidden layer of RBMs with groups of tree-structured binary variables. This extension allows us to obtain models that have more modeling capacity but remain tractable. In experiments on several data sets, we demonstrate the competitiveness of this approach and study some of its properties. Hugo Larochelle, Yoshua Bengio, Joseph P. Turian |
Neural Comput. | 3 |
| 2006 | Advances in Discriminative ParsingabstractThe present work advances the accuracy and training speed of discriminative parsing. Our discriminative parsing method has no generative component, yet surpasses a generative baseline on constituent parsing, and does so with minimal linguistic cleverness. Our model can incorporate arbitrary features of the input and parse state, and performs feature selection incrementally over an exponential feature space during training. We demonstrate the flexibility of our approach by testing it with several parsing strategies and various feature sets. Our implementation is freely available at: http://nlp.cs.nyu.edu/parser/. Joseph P. Turian, I. Dan Melamed |
ACL | 1 |
| 2006 | Scalable Discriminative Learning for Natural Language Parsing and TranslationabstractParsing and translating natural languages can be viewed as problems of predicting tree structures. For machine learning approaches to these predictions, the diversity and high dimensionality of the structures involved mandate very large training sets. This paper presents a purely discriminative learning method that scales up well to problems of this size. Its accuracy was at least as good as other comparable methods on a standard parsing task. To our knowledge, it is the first purely discriminative learning algorithm for translation with treestructured models. Unlike other popular methods, this method does not require a great deal of feature engineering a priori, because it performs feature selection over a compound feature space as it learns. Experiments demonstrate the method's versatility, accuracy, and efficiency. Relevant software is freely available at http://nlp.cs.nyu.edu/parser and http://nlp.cs.nyu.edu/GenPar. Joseph P. Turian, Benjamin Wellington, I. Dan Melamed |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2003 | Evaluation of machine translation and its evaluationabstractEvaluation of MT evaluation measures is limited by inconsistent human judgment data. Nonetheless, machine translation can be evaluated using the well-known measures precision, recall, and their average, the F-measure. The unigram-based F-measure has significantly higher correlation with human judgments than recently proposed alternatives. More importantly, this standard measure has an intuitive graphical interpretation, which can facilitate insight into how MT systems might be improved. The relevant software is publicly available from http://nlp.cs.nyu.edu/GTM/. Joseph P. Turian, Luke Shen, I. Dan Melamed |
MTSummit | 1 |
| 2003 | Precision and Recall of Machine Translation
I. Dan Melamed, Ryan Green, Joseph P. Turian |
HLT-NAACL | 3 |