Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James V. Burke

dblp:71/6610 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-0215-7306ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 54% Information theory · 46%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 62% Optimization for machine learning · 19% Time series and sequential data · 19%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing › sparse recovery
exact recovery condition
0.512021
On the Global Minimizers of Real Robust Phase Retrieval With Sparse Noise · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
l1-norm minimization
0.512021
On the Global Minimizers of Real Robust Phase Retrieval With Sparse Noise · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
phase retrieval
0.512021
On the Global Minimizers of Real Robust Phase Retrieval With Sparse Noise · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization › phase retrieval
robust phase retrieval
0.512021
On the Global Minimizers of Real Robust Phase Retrieval With Sparse Noise · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse recovery
0.512021
On the Global Minimizers of Real Robust Phase Retrieval With Sparse Noise · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
sparse estimation
0.212014
Convex vs non-convex estimators for regression and sparse estimation: the mean squared error properties of ARD and GLasso · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis › bayesian filtering and smoothing
kalman smoothing
0.212013
Sparse/robust estimation and Kalman smoothing with nonsmooth log-concave densities: modeling, computation, and theory · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013
Machine learning › Learning theory › distribution learning
log-concave density estimation
0.212013
Sparse/robust estimation and Kalman smoothing with nonsmooth log-concave densities: modeling, computation, and theory · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization › continuous optimization
non-smooth optimization
0.212013
Sparse/robust estimation and Kalman smoothing with nonsmooth log-concave densities: modeling, computation, and theory · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing
0.112021
On the Global Minimizers of Real Robust Phase Retrieval With Sparse Noise · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
restricted isometry property
0.112021
On the Global Minimizers of Real Robust Phase Retrieval With Sparse Noise · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

restricted isometry property · 0.5null space property · 0.5absolute range property · 0.5mean squared error analysis · 0.2graphical lasso · 0.2automatic relevance determination · 0.2nonsmooth optimization · 0.2log-concave density modeling · 0.2kalman smoothing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 On the Global Minimizers of Real Robust Phase Retrieval With Sparse Noise
abstract
We study a class of real robust phase retrieval problems under a Gaussian assumption on the coding matrix when the received signal is sparsely corrupted by noise. The goal is to establish conditions on the sparsity under which the input vector can be exactly recovered. The recovery problem is formulated as residual minimization in the ℓ1-norm. The main contribution is a robust phase retrieval counterpart to the seminal paper by Candes and Tao on compressed sensing (ℓ1regression) [Decoding by linear programming. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51(12):4203-4215, 2005]. The analysis depends on a key new property of the coding matrix called the Absolute Range Property (ARP) which is the analogue to the Null Space Property (NSP) in compressed sensing. When the residuals are computed using squared magnitudes, we show that ARP follows from a standard Restricted Isometry Property (RIP). However, when the residuals are computed using absolute magnitudes, a different kind of RIP or growth property is required. We conclude by showing that the robust phase retrieval objectives are sharp with respect to their minimizers with high probability.
Aleksandr Y. Aravkin, James V. Burke, Daiwei He
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2015 The Connection Between Bayesian Estimation of a Gaussian Random Field and RKHS
abstract
Reconstruction of a function from noisy data is key in machine learning and is often formulated as a regularized optimization problem over an infinite-dimensional reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). The solution suitably balances adherence to the observed data and the corresponding RKHS norm. When the data fit is measured using a quadratic loss, this estimator has a known statistical interpretation. Given the noisy measurements, the RKHS estimate represents the posterior mean (minimum variance estimate) of a Gaussian random field with covariance proportional to the kernel associated with the RKHS. In this brief, we provide a statistical interpretation when more general losses are used, such as absolute value, Vapnik or Huber. Specifically, for any finite set of sampling locations (that includes where the data were collected), the maximum a posteriori estimate for the signal samples is given by the RKHS estimate evaluated at the sampling locations. This connection establishes a firm statistical foundation for several stochastic approaches used to estimate unknown regularization parameters. To illustrate this, we develop a numerical scheme that implements a Bayesian estimator with an absolute value loss. This estimator is used to learn a function from measurements contaminated by outliers.
Aleksandr Y. Aravkin, Bradley M. Bell, James V. Burke, Gianluigi Pillonetto
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst.3
2014 Convex vs non-convex estimators for regression and sparse estimation: the mean squared error properties of ARD and GLasso
Aleksandr Y. Aravkin, James V. Burke, Alessandro Chiuso, Gianluigi Pillonetto
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2013 Sparse/robust estimation and Kalman smoothing with nonsmooth log-concave densities: modeling, computation, and theory
Aleksandr Y. Aravkin, James V. Burke, Gianluigi Pillonetto
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2004 Variational Analysis of the Abscissa Mapping for Polynomials via the Gauss-Lucas Theorem
James V. Burke, Adrian S. Lewis, Michael L. Overton
J. Glob. Optim.1