EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kurt D. Skifstad
dblp:71/6815
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 54% Learning theory · 36% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 11% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Range estimation from intensity gradient analysis · ICRA 1989 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical pattern recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Automatic Solder Joint Inspection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1988 |
Image and video processing
industrial inspection |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Automatic Solder Joint Inspection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1988 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
range sensing |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Range estimation from intensity gradient analysis · ICRA 1989 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
expert systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Automatic Solder Joint Inspection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1988 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
voting scheme · 0.0statistical pattern recognition · 0.0expert system · 0.0dimensionality reduction · 0.0temporal intensity gradient · 0.0optic flow · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | Range estimation from intensity gradient analysisabstractThe authors have developed a depth-recovery technique that completely avoids the computationally intensive steps of feature selection and correspondence required by conventional approaches. The intensity gradient analysis (IGA) technique is a depth-recovery algorithm that utilizes the properties of the MCSO (moving camera, stationary objects) scenario. Depth values are obtained by analyzing temporal intensity gradients arising from the optic flow field induced by known camera motion. In doing so, IGA avoids the feature extraction and correspondence steps of conventional approaches and is therefore very fast. A detailed description of the algorithm is provided along with experimental results from complex laboratory scenes. It is suggested that the most appealing property of this approach is that IGA places little burden on computational resources, and therefore seems ideally suited for real-world robotic applications.> Kurt D. Skifstad, Ramesh Jain 0001 |
ICRA | 1 |
| 1989 | Illumination independent change detection for real world image sequences
Kurt D. Skifstad, Ramesh Jain 0001 |
Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. | 1 |
| 1989 | Range estimation from Intensity Gradient Analysis
Kurt D. Skifstad, Ramesh Jain 0001 |
Mach. Vis. Appl. | 1 |
| 1988 | Automatic Solder Joint InspectionabstractThe task of automating the visual inspection of pin-in-hole solder joints is addressed. Two approaches are explored: statistical pattern recognition and expert systems. An objective dimensionality-reduction method is used to enhance the performance of traditional statistical pattern recognition approaches by decorrelating feature data, generating feature weights, and reducing run-time computations. The expert system uses features in a manner more analogous to the visual clues that a human inspector would rely on for classification. Rules using these cues are developed, and a voting scheme is implemented to accumulate classification evidence incrementally. Both methods compared favorably with human inspector performance.> Sandra L. Bartlett, Paul J. Besl, Charles L. Cole, Ramesh Jain 0001, Debashish Mukherjee, Kurt D. Skifstad |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 6 |