Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yoonchan Choi
dblp:71/7539
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 67% Transaction processing and concurrency control · 33% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
community detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluation · Internet Measurement Conference 2009 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control
consistency |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluation · Internet Measurement Conference 2009 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › community detection
modularity maximization |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluation · Internet Measurement Conference 2009 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
community structure |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluation · Internet Measurement Conference 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
modularity optimization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluationabstractOnline social networks pose significant challenges to computer scientists, physicists, and sociologists alike, for their massive size, fast evolution, and uncharted potential for social computing. One particular problem that has interested us is community identification. Many algorithms based on various metrics have been proposed for communities in networks [18, 24], but a few algorithms scale to very large networks. Three recent community identification algorithms, namely CNM [16], Wakita [59], and Louvain [10], stand out for their scalability to a few millions of nodes. All of them use modularity as the metric of optimization. However, all three algorithms produce inconsistent communities every time the ordering of nodes to the algorithms changes. Haewoon Kwak, Yoonchan Choi, Young-Ho Eom, Hawoong Jeong, Sue B. Moon |
Internet Measurement Conference | 2 |