Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yoonchan Choi

dblp:71/7539 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 67% Transaction processing and concurrency control · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
community detection
0.112009
Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluation · Internet Measurement Conference 2009
Transaction processing and concurrency control
consistency
0.112009
Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluation · Internet Measurement Conference 2009
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › community detection
modularity maximization
0.112009
Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluation · Internet Measurement Conference 2009
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
community structure
0.012009
Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluation · Internet Measurement Conference 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

modularity optimization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Mining communities in networks: a solution for consistency and its evaluation
abstract
Online social networks pose significant challenges to computer scientists, physicists, and sociologists alike, for their massive size, fast evolution, and uncharted potential for social computing. One particular problem that has interested us is community identification. Many algorithms based on various metrics have been proposed for communities in networks [18, 24], but a few algorithms scale to very large networks. Three recent community identification algorithms, namely CNM [16], Wakita [59], and Louvain [10], stand out for their scalability to a few millions of nodes. All of them use modularity as the metric of optimization. However, all three algorithms produce inconsistent communities every time the ordering of nodes to the algorithms changes.
Haewoon Kwak, Yoonchan Choi, Young-Ho Eom, Hawoong Jeong, Sue B. Moon
Internet Measurement Conference2