Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Richard Schalek
dblp:71/8653
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-2450-1718ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 80% Efficient and distributed learning · 16% Learning paradigms · 4% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › biomedical image segmentation
connectomics segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Two Stream Active Query Suggestion for Active Learning in Connectomics · ECCV (18) 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Two Stream Active Query Suggestion for Active Learning in Connectomics · ECCV (18) 2020 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
boundary detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Boundary Learning by Optimization with Topological Constraints · CVPR 2010 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Boundary Learning by Optimization with Topological Constraints · CVPR 2010 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
supervised learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Boundary Learning by Optimization with Topological Constraints · CVPR 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
two-stream network · 0.4active learning · 0.4warping error · 0.1digital topology · 0.1cost function learning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Two Stream Active Query Suggestion for Active Learning in Connectomics
Zudi Lin, Donglai Wei 0001, Won-Dong Jang, Siyan Zhou, Xupeng Chen, Xueying Wang 0002, Richard Schalek, Daniel R. Berger, Brian Matejek, Lee Kamentsky, Adi Suissa, Daniel Haehn, Thouis R. Jones, Toufiq Parag, Jeff Lichtman, Hanspeter Pfister |
ECCV (18) | 7 |
| 2020 | Learning Guided Electron Microscopy with Active Acquisition
Lu Mi, Hao Wang 0014, Yaron Meirovitch, Richard Schalek, Srinivas C. Turaga, Jeff Lichtman, Aravinthan D. T. Samuel, Nir Shavit |
MICCAI (5) | 4 |
| 2010 | Boundary Learning by Optimization with Topological ConstraintsabstractRecent studies have shown that machine learning can improve the accuracy of detecting object boundaries in images. In the standard approach, a boundary detector is trained by minimizing its pixel-level disagreement with human boundary tracings. This naive metric is problematic because it is overly sensitive to boundary locations. This problem is solved by metrics provided with the Berkeley Segmentation Dataset, but these can be insensitive to topological differences, such as gaps in boundaries. Furthermore, the Berkeley metrics have not been useful as cost functions for supervised learning. Using concepts from digital topology, we propose a new metric called the warping error that tolerates disagreements over boundary location, penalizes topological disagreements, and can be used directly as a cost function for learning boundary detection, in a method that we call Boundary Learning by Optimization with Topological Constraints (BLOTC). We trained boundary detectors on electron microscopic images of neurons, using both BLOTC and standard training. BLOTC produced substantially better performance on a 1.2 million pixel test set, as measured by both the warping error and the Rand index evaluated on segmentations generated from the boundary labelings. We also find our approach yields significantly better segmentation performance than either gPb-OWT-UCM or multiscale normalized cut, as well as Boosted Edge Learning trained directly on our data. Viren Jain, Benjamin Bollmann, Daniel R. Berger, Moritz Helmstaedter, Kevin L. Briggman, Winfried Denk, Jared B. Bowden, John M. Mendenhall, Wickliffe C. Abraham, Kristen M. Harris, Narayanan Kasthuri, Ken J. Hayworth, Richard Schalek, Juan Carlos Tapia, Jeff Lichtman, H. Sebastian Seung |
CVPR | 14 |