Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicolas Robidoux
dblp:72/1631
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Autonomous driving · 58% 3D vision · 29% Image recognition and object detection · 12% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Computational photography and imaging · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational photography and imaging
image signal processing |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | End-to-End High Dynamic Range Camera Pipeline Optimization · CVPR 2021 Hardware-in-the-Loop End-to-End Optimization of Camera Image Processing Pipelines · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | LiDAR-in-the-Loop Hyperparameter Optimization · CVPR 2023 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception
LiDAR perception |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | LiDAR-in-the-Loop Hyperparameter Optimization · CVPR 2023 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception › environment perception
perception for self-driving vehicles |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | LiDAR-in-the-Loop Hyperparameter Optimization · CVPR 2023 |
Computational photography and imaging
high dynamic range imaging |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | End-to-End High Dynamic Range Camera Pipeline Optimization · CVPR 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | LiDAR-in-the-Loop Hyperparameter Optimization · CVPR 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | LiDAR-in-the-Loop Hyperparameter Optimization · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | End-to-End High Dynamic Range Camera Pipeline Optimization · CVPR 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
2d object detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Hardware-in-the-Loop End-to-End Optimization of Camera Image Processing Pipelines · CVPR 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic optimization · 1.3digital signal processing pipeline optimization · 1.3LiDAR simulation · 1.3end-to-end optimization · 1.0block coordinate descent · 1.0multi-objective optimization · 0.9hardware-in-the-loop optimization · 0.90th-order stochastic optimization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | LiDAR-in-the-Loop Hyperparameter OptimizationabstractLiDAR has become a cornerstone sensing modality for 3D vision. LiDAR systems emit pulses of light into the scene, take measurements of the returned signal, and rely on hardware digital signal processing (DSP) pipelines to construct 3D point clouds from these measurements. The resulting point clouds output by these DSPs are input to downstream 3D vision models - both, in the form of training datasets or as input at inference time. Existing LiDAR DSPs are composed of cascades of parameterized operations; modifying configuration parameters results in significant changes in the point clouds and consequently the output of downstream methods. Existing methods treat LiDAR systems as fixed black boxes and construct downstream task networks more robust with respect to measurement fluctuations. Departing from this approach, the proposed method directly optimizes LiDAR sensing and DSP parameters for downstream tasks. To investigate the optimization of LiDAR system parameters, we devise a realistic LiDAR simulation method that generates raw waveforms as input to a LiDAR DSP pipeline. We optimize LiDAR parameters for both 3D object detection IoU losses and depth error metrics by solving a nonlinear multi-objective optimization problem with a 0th-order stochastic algorithm. For automotive 3D object detection models, the proposed method outperforms manual expert tuning by 39.5% mean Average Precision (mAP). Félix Goudreault, Dominik Scheuble, Mario Bijelic, Nicolas Robidoux, Felix Heide |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2021 | End-to-End High Dynamic Range Camera Pipeline OptimizationabstractThe real world is a 280 dB High Dynamic Range (HDR) world which imaging sensors cannot record in a single shot. HDR cameras acquire multiple measurements with different exposures, gains and photodiodes, from which an Image Signal Processor (ISP) reconstructs an HDR image. Dynamic scene HDR image recovery is an open challenge because of motion and because stitched captures have different noise characteristics, resulting in artifacts that ISPs must resolve in real time at double-digit megapixel resolutions. Traditionally, ISP settings used by downstream vision modules are chosen by domain experts; such frozen camera designs are then used for training data acquisition and supervised learning of downstream vision modules. We depart from this paradigm and formulate HDR ISP hyperparameter search as an end-to-end optimization problem, proposing a mixed 0thand 1st-order block coordinate descent optimizer that jointly learns sensor, ISP and detector network weights using RAW image data augmented with emulated SNR transition region artifacts. We assess the proposed method for human vision and image understanding. For automotive object detection, the method improves mAP and mAR by 33% over expert-tuning and 22% over state-of-the-art optimization methods, outperforming expert-tuned HDR imaging and vision pipelines in all HDR laboratory rig and field experiments. Nicolas Robidoux, Luis E. García Capel, Dongeun Seo, Federico Ariza, Felix Heide |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2020 | Hardware-in-the-Loop End-to-End Optimization of Camera Image Processing PipelinesabstractCommodity imaging systems rely on hardware image signal processing (ISP) pipelines. These low-level pipelines consist of a sequence of processing blocks that, depending on their hyperparameters, reconstruct a color image from RAW sensor measurements. Hardware ISP hyperparameters have a complex interaction with the output image, and therefore with the downstream application ingesting these images. Traditionally, ISPs are manually tuned in isolation by imaging experts without an end-to-end objective. Very recently, ISPs have been optimized with 1st-order methods that require differentiable approximations of the hardware ISP. Departing from such approximations, we present a hardware-in-the-loop method that directly optimizes hardware image processing pipelines for end-to-end domain-specific losses by solving a nonlinear multi-objective optimization problem with a novel 0th-order stochastic solver directly interfaced with the hardware ISP. We validate the proposed method with recent hardware ISPs and 2D object detection, segmentation, and human viewing as end-to-end downstream tasks. For automotive 2D object detection, the proposed method outperforms manual expert tuning by 30% mean average precision (mAP) and recent methods using ISP approximations by 18% mAP. Ali Mosleh 0002, Emmanuel Onzon, Fahim Mannan, Nicolas Robidoux, Felix Heide |
CVPR | 5 |
| 1997 | Computer Algebra and Interpolation: A Lesson Plan
Nicolas Robidoux |
J. Symb. Comput. | 1 |