S. C. Hughes

dblp:72/2548 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1985
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 44% Parallel and multicore computing · 28% Electronic design automation · 28%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
design automation tools
0.011985
A technique for distributed execution of design automation tools · DAC 1985
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing
distributed execution
0.011985
A technique for distributed execution of design automation tools · DAC 1985
Cloud and datacenter computing
job scheduling
0.011985
A technique for distributed execution of design automation tools · DAC 1985
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling
cluster resource management
0.011985
A technique for distributed execution of design automation tools · DAC 1985
Cloud and datacenter computing
job submission
0.011985
A technique for distributed execution of design automation tools · DAC 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

execution modes · 0.0distributed execution · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1985 A technique for distributed execution of design automation tools
abstract
The demand for computing resources to support design automation systems is growing dramatically due to VLSI design considerations. This demand has created a need for multiple computing systems to handle the escalated execution requirements of today's Design Automation tools. A distribution technique for executing such tools on multiple computing systems is discussed. The technique employs the definition of three execution modes: interactive foreground, dissociative foreground and batch. Cost and performance considerations are analyzed as they relate to the overall design automation system as well as individual job executions. An implementation of this technique is presented, including the treatment of common system interface, data management, and job submission techniques.
S. C. Hughes, D. B. Lewis, C. J. Rimkus
DAC1