Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tingting Jiang 0012
dblp:72/2833-12
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0008-8671-4771ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing › software validation
acceptance testing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LLM4Fin: Fully Automating LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for FinTech Software Acceptance Testing · ISSTA 2024 |
Software testing › test generation › automated test generation
LLM-based test generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LLM4Fin: Fully Automating LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for FinTech Software Acceptance Testing · ISSTA 2024 |
Software testing
test generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LLM4Fin: Fully Automating LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for FinTech Software Acceptance Testing · ISSTA 2024 |
Software testing › test coverage
code coverage |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | LLM4Fin: Fully Automating LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for FinTech Software Acceptance Testing · ISSTA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model fine-tuning · 0.8information extraction · 0.8algorithmic scenario generation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | LLM4Fin: Fully Automating LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for FinTech Software Acceptance TestingabstractFinTech software, crucial for both safety and timely market deployment, presents a compelling case for automated acceptance testing against regulatory business rules. However, the inherent challenges of comprehending unstructured natural language descriptions of these rules and crafting comprehensive test cases demand human intelligence. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) holds promise for automated test case generation, leveraging their natural language processing capabilities. Yet, their dependence on human intervention for effective prompting hampers efficiency. In response, we introduce a groundbreaking, fully automated approach for generating high-coverage test cases from natural language business rules. Our methodology seamlessly integrates the versatility of LLMs with the predictability of algorithmic methods. We fine-tune pre-trained LLMs for improved information extraction accuracy and algorithmically generate comprehensive testable scenarios for the extracted business rules. Our prototype, LLM4Fin, is designed for testing real-world stock-trading software. Experimental results demonstrate LLM4Fin’s superiority over both state-of-the-art LLM, such as ChatGPT, and skilled testing engineers. We achieve remarkable performance, with up to 98.18% and an average of 20%−110% improvement on business scenario coverage, and up to 93.72% on code coverage, while reducing the time cost from 20 minutes to a mere 7 seconds. These results provide robust evidence of the framework’s practical applicability and efficiency, marking a significant advancement in FinTech software testing. Zhiyi Xue, Liangguo Li, Senyue Tian, Xiaohong Chen 0007, Liangyu Chen 0001, Tingting Jiang 0012, Min Zhang 0002 |
ISSTA | 7 |