Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David K. Tcheng
dblp:72/339
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 93% Computational science and engineering · 7% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 22% Optimization for machine learning · 22% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › multimedia analysis and retrieval › music retrieval
music information retrieval |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Music-to-knowledge (M2K): a prototyping and evaluation environment for music information retrieval research · SIGIR 2005 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Music-to-knowledge (M2K): a prototyping and evaluation environment for music information retrieval research · SIGIR 2005 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
test collection construction |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Music-to-knowledge (M2K): a prototyping and evaluation environment for music information retrieval research · SIGIR 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | A Knowledge-Based Method for Protein Structure Refinement and Prediction · ISMB 1996 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein structure refinement |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | A Knowledge-Based Method for Protein Structure Refinement and Prediction · ISMB 1996 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › rule learning
inductive learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Building Robust Learning Systems by Combining Induction and Optimization · IJCAI 1989 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
knowledge-based method · 0.0recursive splitting · 0.0optimization · 0.0induction · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Music-to-knowledge (M2K): a prototyping and evaluation environment for music information retrieval researchabstractNo abstract available. J. Stephen Downie, Andreas F. Ehmann, David K. Tcheng |
SIGIR | 3 |
| 1996 | A Knowledge-Based Method for Protein Structure Refinement and Prediction
Shankar Subramaniam, David K. Tcheng, James M. Fenton |
ISMB | 2 |
| 1992 | Knowledge Engineering for Protein Structure and Motifs: Design of a Prototype SystemabstractA knowledge base and learning system is designed to help biologists predict protein structure and function based on sequence information. The knowledge base contains diverse information about: (a) protein motif sequences and structures, (b) heuristics and programs for identifying protein features, and (c) molecular simulation programs. The learning system selects the most relevant information for a particular prediction task and optimally integrates the information to generate accurate and comprehensible hypotheses. Biologists define the objectives for learning such as accuracy and comprehensibility. To overcome the limitations of existing induction algorithms, techniques are developed for constructing new features based on the existing knowledge base. Optimization algorithms are used for determining the best combination of induction and feature construction strategies for a problem.> Shankar Subramaniam, David K. Tcheng, K. Hu, Harish Ragavan, Larry A. Rendell |
SEKE | 2 |
| 1992 | Machine Approaches to Protein Feature PredictionabstractKnowledge-based approaches are being increasingly used in predicting protein structure and motifs. Machine learning techniques such as neural networks and decision-trees have become invaluable tools for these approaches. This paper describes the use of machine learning in predicting sequence-based motifs in antibody fragments. Given the limited number of three dimensional structures and the plethora of sequences, this technique is useful for homology modeling of three dimensional structures of antibody fragments. David K. Tcheng, Shankar Subramaniam |
Int. J. Neural Syst. | 1 |
| 1991 | AIMS: An Adaptive Interactive Modeling System for Supporting Engineering Decision Making
David K. Tcheng, Bruce L. Lambert, Stephen C. Y. Lu, Larry A. Rendell |
ML | 1 |
| 1989 | Generalized Recursive Splitting Algorithms for Learning Hybrid Concepts
Bruce L. Lambert, David K. Tcheng, Stephen C. Y. Lu |
ML | 2 |
| 1989 | Building Robust Learning Systems by Combining Induction and Optimization
David K. Tcheng, Bruce L. Lambert, Stephen C. Y. Lu, Larry A. Rendell |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 1987 | Layered Concept-Learning and Dynamically Variable Bias Management
Larry A. Rendell, Raj Sheshu, David K. Tcheng |
IJCAI | 3 |