Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hao Wu 0020
dblp:72/4250-20
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 74% Generative modeling · 13% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Nested Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2021 Amortized Population Gibbs Samplers with Neural Sufficient Statistics · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Conjugate Energy-Based Models · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
importance sampling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Nested Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Conjugate Energy-Based Models · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Conjugate Energy-Based Models · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › importance sampling
adaptive importance sampling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Amortized Population Gibbs Samplers with Neural Sufficient Statistics · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
structured variational inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Amortized Population Gibbs Samplers with Neural Sufficient Statistics · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational inference · 0.5nested importance sampling · 0.5energy-based modeling · 0.5amortized inference · 0.5KL divergence minimization · 0.5neural sufficient statistics · 0.4inclusive KL divergence · 0.4gibbs sampling · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Conjugate Energy-Based ModelsabstractIn this paper, we propose conjugate energy-based models (CEBMs), a new class of energy-based models that define a joint density over data and latent variables. The joint density of a CEBM decomposes into an intractable distribution over data and a tractable posterior over latent variables. CEBMs have similar use cases as variational autoencoders, in the sense that they learn an unsupervised mapping from data to latent variables. However, these models omit a generator network, which allows them to learn more flexible notions of similarity between data points. Our experiments demonstrate that conjugate EBMs achieve competitive results in terms of image modelling, predictive power of latent space, and out-of-domain detection on a variety of datasets. Hao Wu 0020, Babak Esmaeili 0001, Michael L. Wick, Jean-Baptiste Tristan, Jan-Willem van de Meent |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Nested Variational InferenceabstractWe develop nested variational inference (NVI), a family of methods that learn proposals for nested importance samplers by minimizing an forward or reverse KL divergence at each level of nesting. NVI is applicable to many commonly-used importance sampling strategies and provides a mechanism for learning intermediate densities, which can serve as heuristics to guide the sampler. Our experiments apply NVI to (a) sample from a multimodal distribution using a learned annealing path (b) learn heuristics that approximate the likelihood of future observations in a hidden Markov model and (c) to perform amortized inference in hierarchical deep generative models. We observe that optimizing nested objectives leads to improved sample quality in terms of log average weight and effective sample size. Heiko Zimmermann, Hao Wu 0020, Babak Esmaeili 0001, Jan-Willem van de Meent |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Learning proposals for probabilistic programs with inference combinatorsabstractWe develop operators for construction of proposals in probabilistic programs, which we refer to as inference combinators. Inference combinators define a grammar over importance samplers that compose primitive operations such as application of a transition kernel and importance resampling. Proposals in these samplers can be parameterized using neural networks, which in turn can be trained by optimizing variational objectives. The result is a framework for user-programmable variational methods that are correct by construction and can be tailored to specific models. We demonstrate the flexibility of this framework by implementing advanced variational methods based on amortized Gibbs sampling and annealing. Sam Stites, Heiko Zimmermann, Hao Wu 0020, Eli Sennesh, Jan-Willem van de Meent |
UAI | 3 |
| 2020 | Amortized Population Gibbs Samplers with Neural Sufficient StatisticsabstractWe develop amortized population Gibbs (APG) samplers, a class of scalable methods that frame structured variational inference as adaptive importance sampling. APG samplers construct high-dimensional proposals by iterating over updates to lower-dimensional blocks of variables. We train each conditional proposal by minimizing the inclusive KL divergence with respect to the conditional posterior. To appropriately account for the size of the input data, we develop a new parameterization in terms of neural sufficient statistics. Experiments show that APG samplers can be used to train highly-structured deep generative models in an unsupervised manner, and achieve substantial improvements in inference accuracy relative to standard autoencoding variational methods. Hao Wu 0020, Heiko Zimmermann, Eli Sennesh, Tuan Anh Le 0001, Jan-Willem van de Meent |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | Structured Disentangled RepresentationsabstractDeep latent-variable models learn representations of high-dimensional data in an unsupervised manner. A number of recent efforts have focused on learning representations that disentangle statistically independent axes of variation by introducing modifications to the standard objective function. These approaches generally assume a simple diagonal Gaussian prior and as a result are not able to reliably disentangle discrete factors of variation. We propose a two-level hierarchical objective to control relative degree of statistical independence between blocks of variables and individual variables within blocks. We derive this objective as a generalization of the evidence lower bound, which allows us to explicitly represent the trade-offs between mutual information between data and representation, KL divergence between representation and prior, and coverage of the support of the empirical data distribution. Experiments on a variety of datasets demonstrate that our objective can not only disentangle discrete variables, but that doing so also improves disentanglement of other variables and, importantly, generalization even to unseen combinations of factors. Babak Esmaeili 0001, Hao Wu 0020, Alican Bozkurt, N. Siddharth 0001, Brooks Paige, Dana H. Brooks, Jennifer G. Dy, Jan-Willem van de Meent |
AISTATS | 2 |