Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas Schickinger

dblp:72/4300 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 46% Algorithms and data structures · 27% Approximation and online algorithms · 27%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › analysis of algorithms
average-case analysis
0.122006
A new average case analysis for completion time scheduling · J. ACM 2006
A new average case analysis for completion time scheduling · STOC 2002
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
competitive analysis
0.122006
A new average case analysis for completion time scheduling · J. ACM 2006
A new average case analysis for completion time scheduling · STOC 2002
Mathematical optimization
scheduling
0.122006
A new average case analysis for completion time scheduling · J. ACM 2006
A new average case analysis for completion time scheduling · STOC 2002
Mathematical optimization › scheduling
completion time minimization
0.012002
A new average case analysis for completion time scheduling · STOC 2002
Mathematical optimization › scheduling
machine scheduling
0.012002
A new average case analysis for completion time scheduling · STOC 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probability distributions · 0.1competitive analysis · 0.1stochastic analysis · 0.0average-case analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 A new average case analysis for completion time scheduling
abstract
We present a new average case analysis for the problem of scheduling n jobs on m machines so that the sum of job completion times is minimized. Our goal is to use the concept of competitive ratio---which is a typical worst case notion---also within an average case analysis. We show that the classic SEPT scheduling strategy with Ω( n ) worst-case competitive ratio achieves an average of O(1) under several natural distributions, among them the exponential distribution. Our analysis technique allows to also roughly estimate the probability distribution of the competitive ratio. Thus, our result bridges the gap between worst case and average case performance guarantee.
Mark Scharbrodt, Thomas Schickinger, Angelika Steger
J. ACM2
2002 A new average case analysis for completion time scheduling
abstract
(MATH) We present a new average case analysis for the problem of scheduling n jobs on $m$ machines so that the sum of job completion times is minimized. Our analysis transfers the concept of competitive analysis --- which is a typical worst case notion --- to the average case. We show that the classic SEPT scheduling strategy with Ω(n) worst case competitive ratio achieves ${\cal O}(1)$ on the average. Moreover, bounds on the probability distribution of the competitive ratio are derived which provide an in-depth understanding of the stochastic version of the min sum scheduling problem.
Mark Scharbrodt, Thomas Schickinger, Angelika Steger
STOC2
2000 Simplified Witness Tree Arguments
Thomas Schickinger, Angelika Steger
SOFSEM1
1999 Load Balancing Using Bisectors - A Tight Average-Case Analysis
Stefan Bischof 0001, Thomas Schickinger, Angelika Steger
ESA2