Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pablo Moisset de Espanés

dblp:72/4948 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-3161-2635ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational complexity · 55% Algorithms and data structures · 18% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 14%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Emerging computing paradigms · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › computational models
algorithmic self-assembly
0.112005
Complexities for Generalized Models of Self-Assembly · SIAM J. Comput. 2005
Computational complexity › computational models
tile complexity
0.112005
Complexities for Generalized Models of Self-Assembly · SIAM J. Comput. 2005
Emerging computing paradigms › molecular computing
algorithmic self-assembly
0.012004
Invadable self-assembly: combining robustness with efficiency · SODA 2004
Emerging computing paradigms
molecular computing
0.012004
Invadable self-assembly: combining robustness with efficiency · SODA 2004
Emerging computing paradigms
self-assembly
0.012004
Invadable self-assembly: combining robustness with efficiency · SODA 2004
Algorithms and data structures
self-assembly
0.012004
Invadable self-assembly: combining robustness with efficiency · SODA 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kolmogorov complexity · 0.1NP-hardness reduction · 0.1tile assembly model · 0.0polynomial-time verification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Robust reconstruction of Barabási-Albert networks in the broadcast congested clique model
abstract
In the broadcast version of the congested clique model, nodes communicate in synchronous rounds by writing ‐bit messages on a whiteboard, which is visible to all of them. The joint input to the nodes is an undirected ‐node graph , with node receiving the list of its neighbors in . Our goal is to design a protocol at the end of which the information contained in the whiteboard is enough for reconstructing . It has already been shown that there is a one‐round protocol for reconstructing graphs with bounded degeneracy. The main drawback of that protocol is that the degeneracy of the input graph must be knowna prioriby the nodes. Moreover, the protocol fails when applied to graphs with degeneracy larger than . In this article, we address this issue by looking forrobustreconstruction protocols, that is, protocols which always give the correct answer and work efficiently when the input is restricted to a certain class. We introduce a very simple, two‐round protocol that we call Robust‐Reconstruction. We prove that this protocol is robust for reconstructing the class of Barabási‐Albert trees with (expected) message size . Moreover, we present computational evidence suggesting that Robust‐Reconstructionalso generates logarithmic size messages for arbitrary Barabási‐Albert networks. Finally, we stress the importance of the preferential attachment mechanism (used in the construction of Barabási‐Albert networks) by proving that Robust‐Reconstructiondoes notgenerate short messages for random recursive trees. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. NETWORKS, Vol. 67(1), 82–91 2016
Pablo Moisset de Espanés, Ivan Rapaport, Daniel Remenik, Javiera Urrutia
Networks1
2014 Strict Majority Bootstrap Percolation in the r-wheel
Marcos A. Kiwi, Pablo Moisset de Espanés, Ivan Rapaport, Sergio Rica, Guillaume Theyssier
Inf. Process. Lett.2
2008 Toward minimum size self-assembled counters
Pablo Moisset de Espanés, Ashish Goel
Nat. Comput.1
2007 Toward Minimum Size Self-Assembled Counters
Ashish Goel, Pablo Moisset de Espanés
DNA2
2005 Complexities for Generalized Models of Self-Assembly
abstract
In this paper, we study the complexity of self-assembly under models that are natural generalizations of the tile self-assembly model. In particular, we extend Rothemund and Winfree's study of the tile complexity of tile self-assembly [Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Portland, OR, 2000, pp. 459--468]. They provided a lower bound of $\Omega(\frac{\log N}{\log\log N})$ on the tile complexity of assembling an $N\times N$ square for almost all N. Adleman et al. [Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Heraklion, Greece, 2001, pp. 740--748] gave a construction which achieves this bound. We consider whether the tile complexity for self-assembly can be reduced through several natural generalizations of the model. One of our results is a tile set of size $O(\sqrt{\log N})$ which assembles an $N\times N$ square in a model which allows flexible glue strength between nonequal glues. This result is matched for almost all N by a lower bound dictated by Kolmogorov complexity. For three other generalizations, we show that the $\Omega(\frac{\log N}{\log\log N})$ lower bound applies to $N\times N$ squares. At the same time, we demonstrate that there are some other shapes for which these generalizations allow reduced tile sets. Specifically, for thin rectangles with length N and width k, we provide a tighter lower bound of $\Omega(\frac{N^{1/k}}{k})$ for the standard model, yet we also give a construction which achieves $O(\frac{\log N}{\log\log N})$ complexity in a model in which the temperature of the tile system is adjusted during assembly. We also investigate the problem of verifying whether a given tile system uniquely assembles into a given shape; we show that this problem is NP-hard for three of the generalized models.
Gagan Aggarwal, Qi Cheng 0001, Michael H. Goldwasser, Ming-Yang Kao, Pablo Moisset de Espanés, Robert Schweller
SIAM J. Comput.5
2004 Invadable self-assembly: combining robustness with efficiency
Ho-Lin Chen, Qi Cheng 0001, Ashish Goel, Ming-Deh A. Huang, Pablo Moisset de Espanés
SODA5
2002 Combinatorial optimization problems in self-assembly
abstract
Self-assembly is the ubiquitous process by which simple objects autonomously assemble into intricate complexes. It has been suggested that intricate self-assembly processes will ultimately be used in circuit fabrication, nano-robotics, DNA computation, and amorphous computing. In this paper, we study two combinatorial optimization problems related to efficient self-assembly of shapes in the Tile Assembly Model of self-assembly proposed by Rothemund and Winfree [18]. The first is the Minimum Tile Set Problem, where the goal is to find the smallest tile system that uniquely produces a given shape. The second is the Tile Concentrations Problem, where the goal is to decide on the relative concentrations of different types of tiles so that a tile system assembles as quickly as possible. The first problem is akin to finding optimum program size, and the second to finding optimum running time for a "program" to assemble the shape.Self-assembly is the ubiquitous process by which simple objects autonomously assemble into intricate complexes. It has been suggested that intricate self-assembly processes will ultimately be used in circuit fabrication, nano-robotics, DNA computation, and amorphous computing. In this paper, we study two combinatorial optimization problems related to efficient self-assembly of shapes in the Tile Assembly Model of self-assembly proposed by Rothemund and Winfree [18]. The first is the Minimum Tile Set Problem, where the goal is to find the smallest tile system that uniquely produces a given shape. The second is the Tile Concentrations Problem, where the goal is to decide on the relative concentrations of different types of tiles so that a tile system assembles as quickly as possible. The first problem is akin to finding optimum program size, and the second to finding optimum running time for a "program" to assemble the shape.We prove that the first problem is NP-complete in general, and polynomial time solvable on trees and squares. In order to prove that the problem is in NP, we present a polynomial time algorithm to verify whether a given tile system uniquely produces a given shape. This algorithm is analogous to a program verifier for traditional computational systems, and may well be of independent interest. For the second problem, we present a polynomial time $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithm that works for a large class of tile systems that we call partial order systems.
Leonard M. Adleman, Qi Cheng 0001, Ashish Goel, Ming-Deh A. Huang, David Kempe 0001, Pablo Moisset de Espanés, Paul W. K. Rothemund
STOC6