Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eric Scott

dblp:72/530 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
gene fusion detection
0.412019
Alignment-free filtering for cfNA fusion fragments · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequencing error correction
0.112011
Error correction of high-throughput sequencing datasets with non-uniform coverage · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell sequencing
0.012011
Error correction of high-throughput sequencing datasets with non-uniform coverage · Bioinform. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

max-cover filtering · 0.4alignment-free k-mer matching · 0.4probabilistic error model · 0.1hamming graph · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 CARLsim 6: An Open Source Library for Large-Scale, Biologically Detailed Spiking Neural Network Simulation
abstract
Mature simulation systems for Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) become more relevant than ever for understanding the brain and supporting neuromorphic computing. The CARL-sim SNN platform is one of the first Open Source simulation systems that utilized CUDA GPUs to address the tremendous parallel processing demands of natural brains. It has evolved over almost a decade in numerous scientific research projects requiring efficient biologically plausible modeling at scale. With its sixth major release, CARLsim 6 respects this legacy by supporting the latest versions of operating systems, development tool chains, multi-core computers, and of course GPUs. It runs on a range of platforms; from Notebooks up to the NVIDIA DGX-A100 supercomputer, and is used in biologically plausible simulations of the hippocampus and neocortex. The latest version has added flexibility for incorporating long-term and short-term synaptic plasticity. Neuromodulation is an important property of neurobiology that can lead to rapid few shot learning, network rewiring, and neural activity modulation. Because of this, CARLsim 6 now supports four multiple neuromodulators for simulating neural excitability and synaptic plasticity.
Lars Niedermeier, Kexin Chen 0002, Jinwei Xing, Anup Das 0001, Jeffrey Kopsick, Eric Scott, Nate Sutton, Killian Weber, Nikil Dutt, Jeffrey L. Krichmar
IJCNN6
2019 Alignment-free filtering for cfNA fusion fragments
abstract
MOTIVATION: Cell-free nucleic acid (cfNA) sequencing data require improvements to existing fusion detection methods along multiple axes: high depth of sequencing, low allele fractions, short fragment lengths and specialized barcodes, such as unique molecular identifiers. RESULTS: AF4 was developed to address these challenges. It uses a novel alignment-free kmer-based method to detect candidate fusion fragments with high sensitivity and orders of magnitude faster than existing tools. Candidate fragments are then filtered using a max-cover criterion that significantly reduces spurious matches while retaining authentic fusion fragments. This efficient first stage reduces the data sufficiently that commonly used criteria can process the remaining information, or sophisticated filtering policies that may not scale to the raw reads can be used. AF4 provides both targeted and de novo fusion detection modes. We demonstrate both modes in benchmark simulated and real RNA-seq data as well as clinical and cell-line cfNA data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: AF4 is open sourced, licensed under Apache License 2.0, and is available at: https://github.com/grailbio/bio/tree/master/fusion.
Yasushi Saito, Arjun A. Rao, Hyunsung John Kim, Eric Scott, Matthew H. Larson, Wenying Pan, Mohini Desai, Earl Hubbell
Bioinform.6
2011 Error correction of high-throughput sequencing datasets with non-uniform coverage
abstract
MOTIVATION: The continuing improvements to high-throughput sequencing (HTS) platforms have begun to unfold a myriad of new applications. As a result, error correction of sequencing reads remains an important problem. Though several tools do an excellent job of correcting datasets where the reads are sampled close to uniformly, the problem of correcting reads coming from drastically non-uniform datasets, such as those from single-cell sequencing, remains open. RESULTS: In this article, we develop the method Hammer for error correction without any uniformity assumptions. Hammer is based on a combination of a Hamming graph and a simple probabilistic model for sequencing errors. It is a simple and adaptable algorithm that improves on other tools on non-uniform single-cell data, while achieving comparable results on normal multi-cell data. AVAILABILITY: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~pashadag. CONTACT: [email protected].
Paul Medvedev, Eric Scott, Boyko Kakaradov, Pavel A. Pevzner
Bioinform.2
2006 Design and Development of Robotic Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation
abstract
This paper details the design and development of a robotic hardware-in-the-loop simulation platform that can be used for rapid-prototyping industrial manipulators. The architecture of the proposed platform has been presented by Martin and Emami (2006). Potential benefits of such a platform include allowing concurrent development of hardware and control system components and providing a reusable platform for reconfigurable manipulators through a generic and modular structure. Some preliminary tests on the platform have also been discussed in the paper
Adrian Martin, Eric Scott, Mohammad Reza Emami
ICARCV2