Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shen Lin 0006
dblp:72/5911-6
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 46% Optimization for machine learning · 20% Efficient and distributed learning · 20% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 48% Privacy and data protection · 46% Digital forensics and information hiding · 6% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | GDR-GMA: Machine Unlearning via Direction-Rectified and Magnitude-Adjusted Gradients · ACM Multimedia 2024 ERM-KTP: Knowledge-Level Machine Unlearning via Knowledge Transfer · CVPR 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving data processing
graph data privacy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MPGStack: Membership Privacy Protection on Graph Data via Model Stacking · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MPGStack: Membership Privacy Protection on Graph Data via Model Stacking · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MPGStack: Membership Privacy Protection on Graph Data via Model Stacking · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
asynchronous federated learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MODA: Model Ownership Deprivation Attack in Asynchronous Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MODA: Model Ownership Deprivation Attack in Asynchronous Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient ascent |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GDR-GMA: Machine Unlearning via Direction-Rectified and Magnitude-Adjusted Gradients · ACM Multimedia 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GDR-GMA: Machine Unlearning via Direction-Rectified and Magnitude-Adjusted Gradients · ACM Multimedia 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
long-tailed recognition |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LTRL: Boosting Long-Tail Recognition via Reflective Learning · ECCV (67) 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GDR-GMA: Machine Unlearning via Direction-Rectified and Magnitude-Adjusted Gradients · ACM Multimedia 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
model stealing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MODA: Model Ownership Deprivation Attack in Asynchronous Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ERM-KTP: Knowledge-Level Machine Unlearning via Knowledge Transfer · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ERM-KTP: Knowledge-Level Machine Unlearning via Knowledge Transfer · CVPR 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › model intellectual property protection › model watermarking
deep neural network watermarking |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | MODA: Model Ownership Deprivation Attack in Asynchronous Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | MODA: Model Ownership Deprivation Attack in Asynchronous Federated Learning · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
watermarking · 1.5model ownership verification · 1.5model stacking · 0.9label propagation · 0.9ensemble learning · 0.9KFold · 0.9reflective learning · 0.8multi-task learning view · 0.8gradient magnitude adjustment · 0.8gradient direction rectification · 0.8mask structure · 0.7knowledge transfer · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MPGStack: Membership Privacy Protection on Graph Data via Model StackingabstractGraph neural networks (GNNs) can retain the structural information of graph data when processing graph data via message passing mechanism. Recently, GNNs have been widely used in recommendation systems, social networks, finance, etc. However, GNNs are also vulnerable when encountering severe security and data privacy challenges. Membership inference attacks (MIA) on graph data can make the trained GNN model leak the training data, which causes serious privacy problems. However, all the studies reviewed so far suffer from the fact that there are few types of research on GNNs to defend against MIA. In this paper, we proposeMPGStack: a framework that utilizes ensemble learning of GNNs to safeguard against MIA. More concretely, we propose three ensemble strategies inMPGStack: KFold, GP-KFold, and LPA-KFold, which partition the graph at different degrees of granularity based on random uniform partition, class information, and label propagation, respectively.MPGStackcan enhance the target model's generalization performance, mitigate MIA, and boost classification accuracy. The experimental results conducted on seven benchmark datasets demonstrate thatMPGStackcan effectively defend against MIA and significantly reduce the attack model's success rate to the level of random guessing.MPGStackalso improves the classification accuracy of the target model up to 99% or more. Extensive experimental results demonstrate thatMPGStackis more effective, stable, and applicable to different datasets and scenarios than other methods, achieving random guessing attack models while improving the model's classification accuracy on different datasets. Chenyang Chen, Xiaoyu Zhang 0010, Shen Lin 0006, Xiaofeng Chen 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 3 |
| 2024 | LTRL: Boosting Long-Tail Recognition via Reflective Learning
Qihao Zhao, Yalun Dai, Shen Lin 0006, Wei Hu 0004, Fan Zhang 0007, Jun Liu 0036 |
ECCV (67) | 3 |
| 2024 | GDR-GMA: Machine Unlearning via Direction-Rectified and Magnitude-Adjusted GradientsabstractAs concerns over privacy protection grow and relevant laws come into effect, machine unlearning (MU) has emerged as a pivotal research area. Due to the complexity of the forgetting data distribution, the sample-wise MU is still open challenges. Gradient ascent, as the inverse of gradient descent, is naturally applied to machine unlearning, which is also the inverse process of machine learning. However, the straightforward gradient ascent MU method suffers from the trade-off between effectiveness, fidelity, and efficiency. In this work, we analyze the gradient ascent MU process from a multi-task learning (MTL) view. This perspective reveals two problems that cause the trade-off, i.e., the gradient direction problem and the gradient dominant problem. To address these problems, we propose a novel MU method, namely GDR-GMA, consisting of Gradient Direction Rectification (GDR) and Gradient Magnitude Adjustment (GMA). For the gradient direction problem, GDR rectifies the direction between the conflicting gradients by projecting a gradient onto the orthonormal plane of the conflicting gradient. For the gradient dominant problem, GMA dynamically adjusts the magnitude of the update gradients by assigning the dynamic magnitude weight parameter to the update gradients. Furthermore, we evaluate GDR-GMA against several baseline methods in three sample-wise MU scenarios: random data forgetting, sub-class forgetting, and class forgetting. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of GDR-GMA in effectiveness, fidelity, and efficiency Shen Lin 0006, Xiaoyu Zhang 0010, Willy Susilo, Xiaofeng Chen 0001, Jun Liu 0036 |
ACM Multimedia | 1 |
| 2024 | MODA: Model Ownership Deprivation Attack in Asynchronous Federated LearningabstractTraining a deep learning model from scratch requires a great deal of available labeled data, computation resources, and expert knowledge. Thus, the time-consuming and complicated learning procedure catapulted the trained model to valuable intellectual property (IP), spurring interest from attackers in model copyright infringement and stealing. Recently, a new defense approach leverages watermarking techniques to inject watermarks into the training procedure and verify model ownership when necessary. To our best knowledge, there is no research work on model ownership stealing attacks in federated learning, and the existing defense or mitigation methods can not be directly used for federated learning scenarios. In this paper, we introduce watermarking neural networks in asynchronous federated learning and propose a novel model privacy attack, dubbed model ownership deprivation attack (MODA). MODA is launched by an inside adversarial participant, targeting occupying and depriving the remaining participants' (victims) copyright to achieve his maximum profit. The extensive experimental results on five benchmark datasets (MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, GTSRB, SVHN, CIFAR10) show that MODA is highly effective in a two-participant learning scenario with a minor impact on model's performance. When extending MODA into multiple participants scenario, MODA still maintains high attack success rate and classification accuracy. Compared to the state-of-the-art works, MODA has a higher attack success rate than the black-box solution and comparable efficacy with the approach in the white-box scenario. Xiaoyu Zhang 0010, Shen Lin 0006, Chao Chen 0015, Xiaofeng Chen 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 2 |
| 2023 | ERM-KTP: Knowledge-Level Machine Unlearning via Knowledge TransferabstractMachine unlearning can fortify the privacy and security of machine learning applications. Unfortunately, the exact unlearning approaches are inefficient, and the approximate unlearning approaches are unsuitable for complicated CNNs. Moreover, the approximate approaches have serious security flaws because even unlearning completely different data points can produce the same contribution estimation as unlearning the target data points. To address the above problems, we try to define machine unlearning from the knowledge perspective, and we propose a knowledge-level machine unlearning method, namely ERM-KTP. Specifically, we propose an entanglement-reduced mask (ERM) structure to reduce the knowledge entanglement among classes during the training phase. When receiving the un-learning requests, we transfer the knowledge of the non-target data points from the original model to the unlearned model and meanwhile prohibit the knowledge of the target data points via our proposed knowledge transfer and prohibition (KTP) method. Finally, we will get the un-learned model as the result and delete the original model to accomplish the unlearning process. Especially, our proposed ERM-KTP is an interpretable unlearning method because the ERM structure and the crafted masks in KTP can explicitly explain the operation and the effect of un-learning data points. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness, efficiency, high fidelity, and scalability of the ERM-KTP unlearning method. Code is available at https://github.com/RUIYUN-ML/ERM-KTP Shen Lin 0006, Xiaoyu Zhang 0010, Chenyang Chen, Xiaofeng Chen 0001, Willy Susilo |
CVPR | 1 |