Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Srinivas Annam
dblp:72/6207
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Accessibility and assistive technology · 91% User interface design and tools · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Accessibility and assistive technology
assistive technology design |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Web 2.0: blind to an accessible new world · WWW 2009 |
Accessibility and assistive technology
screen reader accessibility |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Web 2.0: blind to an accessible new world · WWW 2009 |
Accessibility and assistive technology
web accessibility |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Web 2.0: blind to an accessible new world · WWW 2009 |
User interface design and tools
web applications |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Web 2.0: blind to an accessible new world · WWW 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user workflow design · 0.1usability research · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Web 2.0: blind to an accessible new worldabstractWith the advent of Web 2.0 technologies, websites have evolved from static pages to dynamic, interactive Web-based applications with the ability to replicate common desktop functionality. However, for blind and visually impaired individuals who rely upon screen readers, Web 2.0 applications force them to adapt to an inaccessible use model. Many technologies, including WAI-ARIA, AJAX, and improved screen reader support, are rapidly evolving to improve this situation. However, simply combining them does not solve the problems of screen reader users. The main contributions of this paper are two models of interaction for screen reader users, for both traditional websites and Web 2.0 applications. Further contributions are a discussion of accessibility difficulties screen reader users encounter when interacting with Web 2.0 applications, a user workflow design model for improving Web 2.0 accessibility, and a set of design requirements for developers to ease the user's burden and increase accessibility. These models, accessibility difficulties, and design implications are based directly on responses and lessons learned from usability research focusing on Web 2.0 usage and screen reader users. Without the conscious effort of Web engineers and designers, most blind and visually impaired users will shy away from using new Web 2.0 technology in favor of desktop based applications. Joshua M. Hailpern, Loretta Guarino Reid, Richard Boardman, Srinivas Annam |
WWW | 4 |