Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jürgen Sellen

dblp:72/6426 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 7 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
7 papers
Computational complexity · 29% Computational geometry · 26% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 25%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory › shortest path
euclidean shortest path
0.132000
Precision-Sensitive Euclidean Shortest Path in 3-Space · SIAM J. Comput. 2000
Precision-Sensitive Euclidean Shortest Path in 3-Space (Extended Abstract) · SCG 1995
Approximate Euclidean Shortest Path in 3-Space · SCG 1994
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.022000
Precision-Sensitive Euclidean Shortest Path in 3-Space · SIAM J. Comput. 2000
Approximate Euclidean Shortest Path in 3-Space · SCG 1994
Graph algorithms and graph theory
shortest path
0.021995
Precision-Sensitive Euclidean Shortest Path in 3-Space (Extended Abstract) · SCG 1995
Approximate Euclidean Shortest Path in 3-Space · SCG 1994
Computational complexity
lower bounds
0.011996
Lower Bounds for Geometrical and Physical Problems · SIAM J. Comput. 1996
Computational geometry
motion planning
0.011996
Lower Bounds for Geometrical and Physical Problems · SIAM J. Comput. 1996
Computational complexity › computational hardness
PSPACE-hardness
0.011996
Lower Bounds for Geometrical and Physical Problems · SIAM J. Comput. 1996
Computational geometry › geometric optimization
smallest enclosing cylinder
0.011996
Smallest Enclosing Cylinders · SCG 1996
Computational complexity
undecidability
0.011996
Lower Bounds for Geometrical and Physical Problems · SIAM J. Comput. 1996
Computational geometry › geometric shortest paths
curvature-constrained shortest path
0.011995
Planning Paths of Minimal Curvature · ICRA 1995
Computational geometry › motion planning
path planning
0.011995
Planning Paths of Minimal Curvature · ICRA 1995
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation schemes
0.011994
Approximate Euclidean Shortest Path in 3-Space · SCG 1994
Computational geometry › motion planning
polygonal obstacles
0.011995
Planning Paths of Minimal Curvature · ICRA 1995
Computational geometry › visibility
visibility graph
0.011995
Direction Weighted Shortest Path Planning · ICRA 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization on fixed edge sequences · 0.0incremental approximation · 0.0turing machine simulation · 0.0reduction framework · 0.0precision-sensitive analysis · 0.0polynomial approximation · 0.0decision procedure · 0.0approximation algorithm · 0.0root-separation bounds · 0.0floating-point complexity bounds · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Smallest Enclosing Cylinders
Elmar Schömer, Jürgen Sellen, Marek Teichmann, Chee-Keng Yap
Algorithmica2
2000 Precision-Sensitive Euclidean Shortest Path in 3-Space
abstract
This paper introduces the concept of precision-sensitive algorithms, analogous to the well-known output-sensitive algorithms. We exploit this idea in studying the complexity of the 3-dimensional Euclidean shortest path problem. Specifically, we analyze an incremental approximation approach and show that this approach yields an asymptotic improvement of running time. By using an optimization technique to improve paths on fixed edge sequences, we modify this algorithm to guarantee a relative error of O(2 -r ) in a time polynomial in r and $1/\delta$, where $\delta$ denotes the relative difference in path length between the shortest and the second shortest path. Our result is the best possible in some sense: if we have a strongly precision-sensitive algorithm, then we can show that unambiguous SAT (USAT) is in polynomial time, which is widely conjectured to be unlikely. Finally, we discuss the practicability of this approach. Experimental results are provided.
Jürgen Sellen, Joonsoo Choi, Chee-Keng Yap
SIAM J. Comput.1
1996 Smallest Enclosing Cylinders
abstract
No abstract available.
Elmar Schömer, Jürgen Sellen, Marek Teichmann, Chee-Keng Yap
SCG2
1996 Lower Bounds for Geometrical and Physical Problems
abstract
Motion planning involving arbitrarily many degrees of freedom is known to be PSPACE-hard. In this paper, we examine the complexity of generalized motion-planning problems for planar mechanisms consisting of independently movable objects. Our constructions constitute a general framework for reducing problems in information processing to motion planning, leading to easy proofs of known PSPACE-hardness results and to exponential lower bounds for geometrical problems related to motion planning. Particulalrly, we show that the problem of deciding whether a given mechanism A can always avoid a collision with another mechanism B is EXPSPACE-hard. New lower bounds are also obtained for the problem of planning under given physical side conditions. We consider the case that certain motions require forces, e.g., to subdue friction, and ask for motions that stay under a given energy limit. Within our framework, we show that such shortest-path problems are EXPTIME-hard if we use number representations by mantissa and exponent, and even undecidable if we allow that some motions require no force or an infinite amount. The proof consists of a simulation of Turing machines with infinite tape and shows that the notion of Turing computability can be interpreted in purely geometrical terms. The geometrical model obtained is capable of expressing a variety of physical-planning problems.
Jürgen Sellen
SIAM J. Comput.1
1995 Precision-Sensitive Euclidean Shortest Path in 3-Space (Extended Abstract)
abstract
This paper introduces the concept of precisionsensitive algorithms, in analogy to the well-known output-sensitive algorithms.We exploit this idea in studying the complexity of the 3-dimensional Euclidean shortest path problem.
Joonsoo Choi, Jürgen Sellen, Chee-Keng Yap
SCG2
1995 Computing a Largest Empty Anchored Cylinder, and Related Problems
Frank Follert, Elmar Schömer, Jürgen Sellen, Michiel H. M. Smid, Christian Thiel 0003
FSTTCS3
1995 Direction Weighted Shortest Path Planning
abstract
We examine shortest path planning under a direction weighted Euclidean metric, motivated by the problem of finding optimal routes for sailboats. We show that for piecewise linear weight functions the shortest path in the unrestricted plane always consists of 2 line segments, and by this solve the problem in a polygonal environment with a visibility graph approach. We then investigate the problem in a general setting, in which the weighted distance measure is supplemented by a link distance measure, and present polynomial approximation algorithms for this case.
Jürgen Sellen
ICRA1
1995 Planning Paths of Minimal Curvature
abstract
We consider the problem of planning curvature constrained paths amidst polygonal obstacles, connecting the given start and target configurations. Let the critical curvature R/sub c//sup -1/ be the minimal curvature for which a constrained path exists. We describe an algorithm which approximates the critical curvature and finds a corresponding path. Further, we give an efficient decision procedure to determine if there exists a path satisfying the given curvature constraint R/sup -1/, with running time polynomial in |R-R/sub c/|/R.
Jürgen Sellen
ICRA1
1994 Approximate Euclidean Shortest Path in 3-Space
abstract
Papadimitriou's approximation approach to the Euclidean shortest path (ESP) problem in 3-space is revisited. As this problem is NP-hard, his approach represents an important step towards practical algorithms. Unfortunately, there are non-trivial gaps in the original description. Besides giving a complete treatment, we also give an alternative to his subdivision method which has some nice properties. Among the tools needed are root-separation bounds and non-trivial applications of Brent's complexity bounds on evaluation of elementary functions using floating point numbers.
Joonsoo Choi, Jürgen Sellen, Chee-Keng Yap
SCG2