EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bo Wang 0116
dblp:72/6811-116
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0007-6488-4932ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems
consensus |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Bandle: Asynchronous State Machine Replication Made Efficient · EuroSys 2024 Flexible Advancement in Asynchronous BFT Consensus · SOSP 2023 |
Distributed systems › replication
state machine replication |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Bandle: Asynchronous State Machine Replication Made Efficient · EuroSys 2024 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
consensus protocol |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Flexible Advancement in Asynchronous BFT Consensus · SOSP 2023 |
Distributed systems › consensus › fault-tolerant consensus
asynchronous consensus |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Flexible Advancement in Asynchronous BFT Consensus · SOSP 2023 |
Distributed systems › consensus
byzantine agreement |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Flexible Advancement in Asynchronous BFT Consensus · SOSP 2023 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Bandle: Asynchronous State Machine Replication Made Efficient · EuroSys 2024 |
Distributed systems
replication |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Bandle: Asynchronous State Machine Replication Made Efficient · EuroSys 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
asynchronous BFT protocol · 1.3asynchronous consensus · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Bandle: Asynchronous State Machine Replication Made EfficientabstractState machine replication (SMR) uses consensus as its core component for reaching agreement among a group of processes, in order to provide fault-tolerant services. Most SMR protocols, such as Paxos and Raft, are designed in the partial synchrony model. Partially synchronous protocols rely on timing assumptions to elect a special role (such as the leader), which may become the performance bottleneck under a heavy workload. From an engineering perspective, partially synchronous protocols have to wait for a pre-defined period of time and implement a (complicated) failover mechanism in order to replace the faulty leader. In contrast, asynchronous protocols are immune to such problems. Bo Wang 0116, Shengyun Liu, Xiangzhe Wang, Wenbo Xu 0002, Jingjing Zhang 0002, Ping Zhong 0002, Yiming Zhang 0003 |
EuroSys | 1 |
| 2023 | Flexible Advancement in Asynchronous BFT ConsensusabstractByzantine fault tolerant (BFT) consensus protocols are becoming an appealing solution to blockchains. As most blockchain systems are deployed on Wide Area Networks (WANs), with each node acting on behalf of its entity, partially synchronous BFT protocols that rely on network synchrony to elect a single leader can be ill-suited. In contrast, asynchronous protocols have no such timing assumptions. Existing asynchronous protocols confront challenges in terms of both flexibility and performance. Shengyun Liu, Wenbo Xu 0002, Chen Shan, Xiaofeng Yan, Tianjing Xu, Bo Wang 0116, Lei Fan 0002, Fuxi Deng, Ying Yan 0002, Hui Zhang 0002 |
SOSP | 6 |
| 2021 | IAP: Instant Auditing Protocol for Anonymous PaymentsabstractBlockchain(e.g., Bitcoin) has widespread use in digital currency, which is entirely public to all participants, revealing users' privacy and transaction details. Anonymous blockchains without auditing capability can offer strong privacy guarantees, they could be used by illegal activities. However, anonymous blockchains with auditing capability suffer from two limitations: (i) inefficient auditing capability; (ii) lower degree of decentralization. To address these problems, this paper presents IAP, an instant auditing protocol based on anonymous blockchain with strong anonymity guarantees, which uses audit node cluster to implement decentralized instant auditing. The experimental results show that IAP only needs 60 milliseconds to complete an audit on average with 16 audit nodes, which accounts for one thousand of a complete transaction time. IAP can still complete efficient auditing when there are more than half of the nodes are honest in the audit node cluster. Moreover, its performance is virtually unaffected by increased number of transactions. Ping Zhong 0002, Bo Wang 0116, Anning Wang, Yiming Zhang 0003, Shengyun Liu, Qikai Zhong, Xuping Tu |
ICPADS | 2 |