Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Caine

dblp:73/1154 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Computational fabrication · 71% Geometric modeling and processing · 29%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational fabrication
assembly
0.021994
The Design of Shape Interactions Using Motion Constraints · ICRA 1994
Assembly strategies for chamferless parts · ICRA 1989
Computational fabrication
assembly planning
0.011994
The Design of Shape Interactions Using Motion Constraints · ICRA 1994
Geometric modeling and processing
configuration space
0.011994
The Design of Shape Interactions Using Motion Constraints · ICRA 1994
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
force control
0.011989
Assembly strategies for chamferless parts · ICRA 1989
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.011989
Assembly strategies for chamferless parts · ICRA 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

motion constraint modeling · 0.0heuristic search · 0.0contact configuration analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 The Design of Shape Interactions Using Motion Constraints
abstract
In this paper we examine an approach to the visualization, analysis and design of functional shape interactions represented as motion constraints in configuration space. A graphical constraint representation, together with a set of computational tools we have developed, permits a designer to visualize and directly manipulate motion constraints in order to achieve desired functional properties. The resulting system has been implemented and applied to the analysis and design of a set of orienting, fixturing and assembly devices for the automated assembly of planar parts.>
Michael Caine
ICRA1
1989 Assembly strategies for chamferless parts
abstract
The authors illustrate the need for planning in assembly and describe a set of modeling and planning techniques developed to generate robust force-control strategies for a certain class of assemblies. Specifically, they develop strategies for the chamferless insertion of a planar peg into a hole and the insertion of a three-dimensional rectangular peg into a rectangular hole. The complexity of applying these techniques in three dimensions is also discussed. It is seen from the analysis of the insertion of a planar peg into a chamferless hole that there are cases where an assembly may not be reliably carried out if the contact configurations between parts are not constrained. In such cases it is necessary to a priori specify the configurations through which the assembly must pass, and guarantee that only those configurations are encountered. From the analysis for the insertion of a three-dimensional rectangular peg into a chamferless hole, it is seen that for moderately complex assemblies involving may possible configurations, the specification of a set of configurations through which parts must pass is considerably more difficult than for the planar case. However, by considering only a subset of the possible configurations chosen on the basis of a set of heuristics, successful assembly strategies can be generated.>
Michael Caine, Tomás Lozano-Pérez, Warren P. Seering
ICRA1