Over the past few years, reverse auctions have attracted a lot of attention in the AI community. They offer the prospect of more efficiently matching suppliers and producers in the face of changing market conditions. Prior research has generally ignored the temporal and finite capacity constraints under which reverse auctioneers typically operate. In this paper, we consider the problem faced by a reverse auctioneer (e.g. a manufacturer) that can procure key components or services from a number of possible suppliers through multi-attribute reverse auctions. Bids submitted by prospective suppliers include a price and a delivery date. The reverse auctioneer has to select a combination of supplier bids that will maximize its overall profit, taking into account its own finite capacity and the prices and delivery dates offered by different suppliers for the same components/services. The auctioneer's profit is determined by the revenue generated by the products it sells, the costs of the components/services it purchases as well as late delivery penalties it incurs if it fails to deliver products/services in time to its own customers. We provide a formal model of this important class of problems, discuss its complexity and introduce rules that can be used to efficiently prune the resulting search space. We also introduce a branch-and-bound algorithm and an efficient heuristic search procedure for this class of problems. Empirical results show that our heuristic procedure typically yields solutions that are within 10 percent of the optimum. They also indicate that taking into account finite capacity considerations can significantly improve the reverse auctioneer's bottom line.

Dynamic supply chain practices offer the prospect of more efficiently matching suppliers and producers in the face of changing market conditions. Prior research aimed at studying dynamic supply chain formation problems has generally ignored constraints imposed by the finite capacity of manufacturers. In this paper, we consider the problem faced by a manufacturer who can procure key components from a number of possible suppliers through multi-attribute reverse auction mechanisms. Bids submitted by prospective suppliers include a price and a delivery date. The manufacturer has to select a combination of supplier bids that will maximize its overall profit, taking into account the revenue generated by each product it has to deliver, the costs of the components it has to procure as well as late delivery penalties (incurred for missing promised delivery dates to its own customers).