Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Thomas F. Coleman

dblp:73/1688 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 7 · 7 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 67% Information retrieval · 33%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.212015
RankRC: Large-Scale Nonlinear Rare Class Ranking · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015
Information retrieval
ranking
0.212015
RankRC: Large-Scale Nonlinear Rare Class Ranking · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › imbalanced classification
rare class classification
0.212015
RankRC: Large-Scale Nonlinear Rare Class Ranking · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
regularized risk minimization
0.112015
RankRC: Large-Scale Nonlinear Rare Class Ranking · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015
Mathematical optimization
least squares
0.011986
Predicting fill for sparse orthogonal factorization · J. ACM 1986
Algorithms and data structures
numerical linear algebra
0.011986
Predicting fill for sparse orthogonal factorization · J. ACM 1986
Mathematical optimization › least squares
sparse least squares
0.011986
Predicting fill for sparse orthogonal factorization · J. ACM 1986
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › matrix optimization
sparse matrix factorization
0.011986
Predicting fill for sparse orthogonal factorization · J. ACM 1986
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › matching
bipartite matching
0.011986
Predicting fill for sparse orthogonal factorization · J. ACM 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regularized loss minimization · 0.4kernel methods · 0.4AUC optimization · 0.4symbolic factorization · 0.0bipartite graph matching · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Bounding the difference between RankRC and RankSVM and application to multi-level rare class kernel ranking
Aditya Tayal, Thomas F. Coleman, Yuying Li 0001
Data Min. Knowl. Discov.2
2015 RankRC: Large-Scale Nonlinear Rare Class Ranking
abstract
Rare class problems are common in real-world applications across a wide range of domains. Standard classification algorithms are known to perform poorly in these cases, since they focus on overall classification accuracy. In addition, we have seen a significant increase of data in recent years, resulting in many large scale rare class problems. In this paper, we focus on nonlinear kernel based classification methods expressed as a regularized loss minimization problem. We address the challenges associated with both rare class problems and large scale learning, by 1) optimizing area under curve of the receiver of operator characteristic in the training process, instead of classification accuracy and 2) using a rare class kernel representation to achieve an efficient time and space algorithm. We call the algorithm RankRC. We provide justifications for the rare class representation and experimentally illustrate the effectiveness of RankRC in test performance, computational complexity, and model robustness.
Aditya Tayal, Thomas F. Coleman, Yuying Li 0001
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2
2014 Primal explicit max margin feature selection for nonlinear support vector machines
Aditya Tayal, Thomas F. Coleman, Yuying Li 0001
Pattern Recognit.2
2003 Hedging a portfolio of derivatives by modeling cost
abstract
We consider the problem of hedging the loss of a given portfolio of derivatives using a set of more liquid derivative instruments. We illustrate why the typical mathematical formulation for this hedging problem is ill-posed. We propose to determine a hedging portfolio by minimizing a proportional cost subject to an upper bound on the hedge risk; this bound is typically slightly larger than the optimal hedge risk achievable without cost consideration. We illustrate that the optimal hedging portfolio obtained by the proposed method is attractive since it consists of fewer instruments with a comparable risk. Finally we illustrate the importance of modeling volatility uncertainty in hedge risk minimization.
Katharyn A. Boyle, Thomas F. Coleman, Yuying Li 0001
CIFEr2
2000 ADMIT-1: automatic differentiation and MATLAB interface toolbox
abstract
ADMIT-1 enables the computation of sparse Jacobian and Hessian matrices, using automatic differentiation technology, from a MATLAB environment. Given a function to be differentiated, ADMIT-1 will exploit sparsity if present to yield sparse derivative matrices (in sparse MATLAB form). A generic automatic differentiation tool, subject to some functionality requirements, can be plugged into ADMIT-1; examples include ADOL-C (C/C++ target functions)and ADMAT (MATLAB target funcitons). ADMIT-1 also allows for the calculation of gradients and has several other related functions. This article provides an introduction to the design and usage of ADMIT-1.
Thomas F. Coleman, Arun Verma
ACM Trans. Math. Softw.1
1996 Parallel continuation-based global optimization for molecular conformation and protein folding
Thomas F. Coleman
J. Glob. Optim.1
1994 A parallel build-up algorithm for global energy minimizations of molecular clusters using effective energy simulated annealing
Thomas F. Coleman, David Shalloway
J. Glob. Optim.1
1986 Predicting fill for sparse orthogonal factorization
abstract
In solving large sparse linear least squares problems A x ≃ b, several different numeric methods involve computing the same upper triangular factor R of A . It is of interest to be able to compute the nonzero structure of R , given only the structure of A . The solution to this problem comes from the theory of matchings in bipartite graphs. The structure of A is modeled with a bipartite graph, and it is shown how the rows and columns of A can be rearranged into a structure from which the structure of its upper triangular factor can be correctly computed. Also, a new method for solving sparse least squares problems, called block back-substitution, is presented. This method assures that no unnecessary space is allocated for fill, and that no unnecessary space is needed for intermediate fill.
Thomas F. Coleman, Anders Edenbrandt, John R. Gilbert
J. ACM1
1985 Software for Estimating Sparse Hessian Matrices
abstract
The solution of a nonlinear optimization problem often requires an estimate of the Hessian matrix for a function f . In large scale problems, the Hessian matrix is usually sparse, and then estimation by differences of gradients is attractive because the number of differences can be small compared to the dimension of the problem. In this paper we describe a set of subroutines whose purpose is to estimate the Hessian matrix with the least possible number of gradient evaluations.
Thomas F. Coleman, Burton S. Garbow, Jorge J. Moré
ACM Trans. Math. Softw.1
1985 Algorithm 636: FORTRAN Subroutines for Estimating Sparse Hessian Matrices
abstract
No abstract available.
Thomas F. Coleman, Burton S. Garbow, Jorge J. Moré
ACM Trans. Math. Softw.1
1984 Software for estimating sparse Jacobian matrices
abstract
In many nonlinear problems it is necessary to estimate the Jacobian matrix of a nonlinear mapping F. In large-scale problems the Jacobian of F is usually sparse, and then estimation by differences is attractive because the number of differences can be small compared with the dimension of the problem.For example, if the Jacobian matrix is banded, then the number of differences needed to estimate the Jacobian matrix is, at most, the width of the band.In this paper we describe a set of subroutines whose purpose is to estimate the Jacobian matrix of a mapping F with the least possible number of function evaluations.
Thomas F. Coleman, Burton S. Garbow, Jorge J. Moré
ACM Trans. Math. Softw.1
1984 Algorithm 618: FORTRAN subroutines for estimating sparse Jacobian Matrices
abstract
No abstract available.
Thomas F. Coleman, Burton S. Garbow, Jorge J. Moré
ACM Trans. Math. Softw.1