Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adam W. M. van Eekeren
dblp:73/2798
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 87% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing › image reconstruction › spatiotemporal reconstruction
multiframe reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Multiframe Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Small Moving Objects · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010 |
Image and video processing
super-resolution |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Multiframe Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Small Moving Objects · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
object tracking |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Multiframe Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Small Moving Objects · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
total variation regularization · 0.1linear motion model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Multiframe Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Small Moving ObjectsabstractMultiframe super-resolution (SR) reconstruction of small moving objects against a cluttered background is difficult for two reasons: a small object consists completely of “mixed” boundary pixels and the background contribution changes from frame-to-frame. We present a solution to this problem that greatly improves recognition of small moving objects under the assumption of a simple linear motion model in the real-world. The presented method not only explicitly models the image acquisition system, but also the space-time variant fore- and background contributions to the “mixed” pixels. The latter is due to a changing local background as a result of the apparent motion. The method simultaneously estimates a subpixel precise polygon boundary as well as a high-resolution (HR) intensity description of a small moving object subject to a modified total variation constraint. Experiments on simulated and real-world data show excellent performance of the proposed multiframe SR reconstruction method. Adam W. M. van Eekeren, Klamer Schutte, Lucas J. van Vliet |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |
| 2008 | Super-Resolution on small moving objectsabstractMoving objects are often the most interesting parts in image sequences. When images from a camera are undersampled and the moving object is depicted small on the image plane, processing afterwards may help to improve the visibility as well as automatic recognition of the object. This paper presents an approach which performs Super-Resolution (SR) specifically on small moving objects. The presented approach estimates simultaneously a sub-pixel accurate boundary and an intensity description of the small moving object. This approach has the advantage that it permits explicit modeling of the partial volume effect for pixels which are influenced by both the moving object and the background of the scene. This paper describes the setup of the proposed SR algorithm for small moving objects and shows its superior performance in comparison with a standard SR approach. Adam W. M. van Eekeren, Klamer Schutte, Lucas J. van Vliet |
ICIP | 1 |
| 2006 | Super-Resolution on Moving Objects and BackgroundabstractUnlike most Super-Resolution (SR) methods described in literature, which perform only SR reconstruction on the background of an image scene, we propose a framework that performs SR reconstruction simultaneously on the background and on moving objects. After registration of the background, moving objects are detected and to each moving object registration is applied. The fusion and deblurring tasks of the framework are performed by the well-known method of Hardie. To evaluate the performance of the framework the Triangle Orientation Discrimination (TOD) method is used. The TOD method quantitatively measures the SR performance on the image background and on moving objects. From experiments it can be concluded that under proper conditions, the SR performance on moving objects is similar as the SR performance on the background. Adam W. M. van Eekeren, Klamer Schutte, Judith Dijk, Dirk-Jan J. de Lange, Lucas J. van Vliet |
ICIP | 1 |