Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lin He 0002
dblp:73/2845-2
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Fingerprinting protein structures effectively and efficiently · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics › structural similarity
protein structure similarity |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Fingerprinting protein structures effectively and efficiently · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › quantitative proteomics
label-free quantification |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A combinatorial approach to the peptide feature matching problem for label-free quantification · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A combinatorial approach to the peptide feature matching problem for label-free quantification · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomarker discovery |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | A combinatorial approach to the peptide feature matching problem for label-free quantification · Bioinform. 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hit-rate scoring · 0.2fragment alphabet · 0.2contact library · 0.2time alignment · 0.2combinatorial optimization · 0.2bipartite graph matching · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Fingerprinting protein structures effectively and efficientlyabstractMOTIVATION: One common task in structural biology is to assess the similarities and differences among protein structures. A variety of structure alignment algorithms and programs has been designed and implemented for this purpose. A major drawback with existing structure alignment programs is that they require a large amount of computational time, rendering them infeasible for pairwise alignments on large collections of structures. To overcome this drawback, a fragment alphabet learned from known structures has been introduced. The method, however, considers local similarity only, and therefore occasionally assigns high scores to structures that are similar only in local fragments. METHOD: We propose a novel approach that eliminates false positives, through the comparison of both local and remote similarity, with little compromise in speed. Two kinds of contact libraries (ContactLib) are introduced to fingerprint protein structures effectively and efficiently. Each contact group of the contact library consists of one local or two remote fragments and is represented by a concise vector. These vectors are then indexed and used to calculate a new combined hit-rate score to identify similar protein structures effectively and efficiently. RESULTS: We tested our method on the high-quality protein structure subset of SCOP30 containing 3297 protein structures. For each protein structure of the subset, we retrieved its neighbor protein structures from the rest of the subset. The best area under the Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve, archived by ContactLib, is as high as 0.960. This is a significant improvement compared with 0.747, the best result achieved by FragBag. We also demonstrated that incorporating remote contact information is critical to consistently retrieve accurate neighbor protein structures for all- query protein structures. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/∼xfcui/contactlib/. Xuefeng Cui, Shuaicheng Li 0001, Lin He 0002, Ming Li 0001 |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2013 | A combinatorial approach to the peptide feature matching problem for label-free quantificationabstractMOTIVATION: Label-free quantification is an important approach to identify biomarkers, as it measures the quantity change of peptides across different biological samples. One of the fundamental steps for label-free quantification is to match the peptide features that are detected in two datasets to each other. Although ad hoc software tools exist for the feature matching, the definition of a combinatorial model for this problem is still not available. RESULTS: A combinatorial model is proposed in this article. Each peptide feature contains a mass value and a retention time value, which are used to calculate a matching weight between a pair of features. The feature matching is to find the maximum-weighted matching between the two sets of features, after applying a to-be-computed time alignment function to all the retention time values of one set of the features. This is similar to the maximum matching problem in a bipartite graph. But we show that the requirement of time alignment makes the problem NP-hard. Practical algorithms are also provided. Experiments on real data show that the algorithm compares favorably with other existing methods. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Lin He 0002, Bin Ma 0002 |
Bioinform. | 2 |