Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jinru He

dblp:73/3178 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 7 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Information retrieval · 81% Spatial and temporal data management · 19%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › indexing
index compression
0.322012
Optimizing positional index structures for versioned document collections · SIGIR 2012
Faster temporal range queries over versioned text · SIGIR 2011
Information retrieval
query processing
0.222009
Using graphics processors for high performance IR query processing · WWW 2009
Using graphics processors for high-performance IR query processing · WWW 2008
Information retrieval › indexing › inverted index
positional index
0.112012
Optimizing positional index structures for versioned document collections · SIGIR 2012
Information retrieval › indexing
index partitioning
0.112011
Faster temporal range queries over versioned text · SIGIR 2011
Information retrieval › indexing › index compression
inverted index compression
0.112011
Faster temporal range queries over versioned text · SIGIR 2011
Spatial and temporal data management
temporal query processing
0.112011
Faster temporal range queries over versioned text · SIGIR 2011
Spatial and temporal data management › temporal query processing
temporal range query
0.112011
Faster temporal range queries over versioned text · SIGIR 2011
Information retrieval › indexing
inverted index
0.112009
Using graphics processors for high performance IR query processing · WWW 2009
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU computing
0.122009
Using graphics processors for high performance IR query processing · WWW 2009
Using graphics processors for high-performance IR query processing · WWW 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

delta compression · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Optimizing positional index structures for versioned document collections
abstract
Versioned document collections are collections that contain multiple versions of each document. Important examples are Web archives, Wikipedia and other wikis, or source code and documents maintained in revision control systems. Versioned document collections can become very large, due to the need to retain past versions, but there is also a lot of redundancy between versions that can be exploited. Thus, versioned document collections are usually stored using special differential (delta) compression techniques, and a number of researchers have recently studied how to exploit this redundancy to obtain more succinct full-text index structures.
Jinru He, Torsten Suel
SIGIR1
2011 Text vs. space: efficient geo-search query processing
abstract
Many web search services allow users to constrain text queries to a geographic location (e.g., yoga classes near Santa Monica). Important examples include local search engines such as Google Local and location-based search services for smart phones. Several research groups have studied the efficient execution of queries mixing text and geography; their approaches usually combine inverted lists with a spatial access method such as an R-tree or space-filling curve. In this paper, we take a fresh look at this problem. We feel that previous work has often focused on the spatial aspect at the expense of performance considerations in text processing, such as inverted index access, compression, and caching. We describe new and existing approaches and discuss their different perspectives. We then compare their performance in extensive experiments on large document collections. Our results indicate that a query processor that combines state-of-the-art text processing techniques with a simple coarse-grained spatial structure can outperform existing approaches by up to two orders of magnitude. In fact, even a naive approach that first uses a simple inverted index and then filters out any documents outside the query range outperforms many previous methods.
Maria Christoforaki, Jinru He, Constantinos Dimopoulos, Alexander Markowetz, Torsten Suel
CIKM2
2011 Faster temporal range queries over versioned text
abstract
Versioned textual collections are collections that retain multiple versions of a document as it evolves over time. Important large-scale examples are Wikipedia and the web collection of the Internet Archive. Search queries over such collections often use keywords as well as temporal constraints, most commonly a time range of interest. In this paper, we study how to support such temporal range queries over versioned text. Our goal is to process these queries faster than the corresponding keyword-only queries, by exploiting the additional constraint. A simple approach might partition the index into different time ranges, and then access only the relevant parts. However, specialized inverted index compression techniques are crucial for large versioned collections, and a naive partitioning can negatively affect index size and query throughput. We show how to achieve high query throughput by using smart index partitioning techniques that take index compression into account. Experiments on over 85 million versions of Wikipedia articles show that queries can be executed in a few milliseconds on memory-based index structures, and only slightly more time on disk-based structures. We also show how to efficiently support the recently proposed stable top-k search primitive on top of our schemes.
Jinru He, Torsten Suel
SIGIR1
2010 Improved index compression techniques for versioned document collections
abstract
Current Information Retrieval systems use inverted index structures for efficient query processing. Due to the extremely large size of many data sets, these index structures are usually kept in compressed form, and many techniques for optimizing compressed size and query processing speed have been proposed. In this paper, we focus on versioned document collections, that is, collections where each document is modified over time, resulting in multiple versions of the document. Consecutive versions of the same document are often similar, and several researchers have explored ideas for exploiting this similarity to decrease index size.
Jinru He, Junyuan Zeng, Torsten Suel
CIKM1
2009 Compact full-text indexing of versioned document collections
abstract
We study the problem of creating highly compressed full-text index structures for versioned document collections, that is, collections that contain multiple versions of each document. Important examples of such collections are Wikipedia or the web page archive maintained by the Internet Archive. A straightforward indexing approach would simply treat each document version as a separate document, such that index size scales linearly with the number of versions. However, several authors have recently studied approaches that exploit the significant similarities between different versions of the same document to obtain much smaller index sizes. In this paper, we propose new techniques for organizing and compressing inverted index structures for such collections. We also perform a detailed experimental comparison of new techniques and the existing techniques in the literature. Our results on an archive of the English version of Wikipedia, and on a subset of the Internet Archive collection, show significant benefits over previous approaches.
Jinru He, Torsten Suel
CIKM1
2009 Using graphics processors for high performance IR query processing
abstract
Web search engines are facing formidable performance challenges due to data sizes and query loads. The major engines have to process tens of thousands of queries per second over tens of billions of documents. To deal with this heavy workload, such engines employ massively parallel systems consisting of thousands of machines. The significant cost of operating these systems has motivated a lot of recent research into more efficient query processing mechanisms. We investigate a new way to build such high performance IR systems using graphical processing units (GPUs). GPUs were originally designed to accelerate computer graphics applications through massive on-chip parallelism. Recently a number of researchers have studied how to use GPUs for other problem domains such as databases and scientific computing. Our contribution here is to design a basic system architecture for GPU-based high-performance IR, to develop suitable algorithms for subtasks such as inverted list compression, list intersection, and top-$k$ scoring, and to show how to achieve highly efficient query processing on GPU-based systems. Our experimental results for a prototype GPU-based system on $25.2$ million web pages indicate that significant gains in query processing performance can be obtained.
Shuai Ding 0006, Jinru He, Torsten Suel
WWW2
2008 Using graphics processors for high-performance IR query processing
abstract
Web search engines are facing formidable performance challenges as they need to process thousands of queries per second over billions of documents. To deal with this heavy workload, current engines use massively parallel architectures of thousands of machines that require large hardware investments.
Shuai Ding 0006, Jinru He, Torsten Suel
WWW2