Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

In-Koo Cho

dblp:73/3572 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-7917-9151ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 67% Learning theory · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting
0.812024
Iterative Weak Learnability and Multiclass AdaBoost · KDD 2024
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.812024
Iterative Weak Learnability and Multiclass AdaBoost · KDD 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
weak learning
0.812024
Iterative Weak Learnability and Multiclass AdaBoost · KDD 2024
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Iterative Weak Learnability and Multiclass AdaBoost
abstract
We propose an efficient boosting algorithm for multiclass classification, called AdaBoost.Iter, that extends SAMME and AdaBoost. The algorithm iteratively applies the weak learnability condition of SAMME to eliminate classes to find the correct classificiation. The iterative weak learnability is a sufficient and necessary condition for boostability, but it is also easier to validate than the EOR criterion of AdaBoost.MM \citeMukherjeeSchapire2013. We show that the training error of AdaBoost.Iter vanishes at the exponential rate, while the generalization error converges to zero at the same rate as AdaBoost. AdaBoost.Iter numerically outperforms SAMME and achieves performance comparable to AdaBoost.MM on benchmark datasets.
In-Koo Cho, Jonathan Libgober
KDD1