Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Norman H. Lee
dblp:73/3730
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0003-4795-1420ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics › statistical bioinformatics
statistical genomics |
0.3 | 2 | 2017 | An efficient concordant integrative analysis of multiple large-scale two-sample expression data sets · Bioinform. 2017 Associating quantitative behavioral traits with gene expression in the brain: searching for diamonds in the hay · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.2 | 2 | 2017 | An efficient concordant integrative analysis of multiple large-scale two-sample expression data sets · Bioinform. 2017 Associating quantitative behavioral traits with gene expression in the brain: searching for diamonds in the hay · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | An efficient concordant integrative analysis of multiple large-scale two-sample expression data sets · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genotype-phenotype association
gene-phenotype association |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Associating quantitative behavioral traits with gene expression in the brain: searching for diamonds in the hay · Bioinform. 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixture model · 0.3generalized estimating equations · 0.3expectation-maximization · 0.3multiple testing correction · 0.1hierarchical FDR testing · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | An efficient concordant integrative analysis of multiple large-scale two-sample expression data setsabstractMOTIVATION: We have proposed a mixture model based approach to the concordant integrative analysis of multiple large-scale two-sample expression datasets. Since the mixture model is based on the transformed differential expression test P-values (z-scores), it is generally applicable to the expression data generated by either microarray or RNA-seq platforms. The mixture model is simple with three normal distribution components for each dataset to represent down-regulation, up-regulation and no differential expression. However, when the number of datasets increases, the model parameter space increases exponentially due to the component combination from different datasets. RESULTS: In this study, motivated by the well-known generalized estimating equations (GEEs) for longitudinal data analysis, we focus on the concordant components and assume that the proportions of non-concordant components follow a special structure. We discuss the exchangeable, multiset coefficient and autoregressive structures for model reduction, and their related expectation-maximization (EM) algorithms. Then, the parameter space is linear with the number of datasets. In our previous study, we have applied the general mixture model to three microarray datasets for lung cancer studies. We show that more gene sets (or pathways) can be detected by the reduced mixture model with the exchangeable structure. Furthermore, we show that more genes can also be detected by the reduced model. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data have been increasingly collected. The advantage of incorporating the concordance feature has also been clearly demonstrated based on TCGA RNA sequencing data for studying two closely related types of cancer. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Additional results are included in a supplemental file. Computer program R-functions are freely available at http://home.gwu.edu/∼ylai/research/Concordance. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Yinglei Lai, Fanni Zhang, Tapan K. Nayak, Reza Modarres, Norman H. Lee, Timothy A. McCaffrey |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2009 | A Factor Graph Nested Effects Model To Identify Networks from Genetic PerturbationsabstractComplex phenotypes such as the transformation of a normal population of cells into cancerous tissue result from a series of molecular triggers gone awry. We describe a method that searches for a genetic network consistent with expression changes observed under the knock-down of a set of genes that share a common role in the cell, such as a disease phenotype. The method extends the Nested Effects Model of Markowetz et al. (2005) by using a probabilistic factor graph to search for a network representing interactions among these silenced genes. The method also expands the network by attaching new genes at specific downstream points, providing candidates for subsequent perturbations to further characterize the pathway. We investigated an extension provided by the factor graph approach in which the model distinguishes between inhibitory and stimulatory interactions. We found that the extension yielded significant improvements in recovering the structure of simulated and Saccharomyces cerevisae networks. We applied the approach to discover a signaling network among genes involved in a human colon cancer cell invasiveness pathway. The method predicts several genes with new roles in the invasiveness process. We knocked down two genes identified by our approach and found that both knock-downs produce loss of invasive potential in a colon cancer cell line. Nested effects models may be a powerful tool for inferring regulatory connections and genes that operate in normal and disease-related processes. Charles J. Vaske, Carrie House, Truong Luu, Bryan Frank, Chen-Hsiang Yeang, Norman H. Lee, Joshua M. Stuart |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 6 |
| 2007 | Associating quantitative behavioral traits with gene expression in the brain: searching for diamonds in the hayabstractUNLABELLED: Gene expression and phenotypic functionality can best be associated when they are measured quantitatively within the same experiment. The analysis of such a complex experiment is presented, searching for associations between measures of exploratory behavior in mice and gene expression in brain regions. The analysis of such experiments raises several methodological problems. First and foremost, the size of the pool of potential discoveries being screened is enormous yet only few biologically relevant findings are expected, making the problem of multiple testing especially severe. We present solutions based on screening by testing related hypotheses, then testing the hypotheses of interest. In one variant the subset is selected directly, in the other one a tree of hypotheses is tested hierarchical; both variants control the False Discovery Rate (FDR). Other problems in such experiments are in the fact that the level of data aggregation may be different for the quantitative traits (one per animal) and gene expression measurements (pooled across animals); in that the association may not be linear; and in the resolution of interest only few replications exist. We offer solutions to these problems as well. The hierarchical FDR testing strategies presented here can serve beyond the structure of our motivating example study to any complex microarray study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Anat Reiner-Benaim, Daniel Yekutieli, Noah E. Letwin, Gregory I. Elmer, Norman H. Lee, Neri Kafkafi, Yoav Benjamini |
Bioinform. | 5 |