Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter S. Maybeck

dblp:73/4496 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network › feedforward neural network training
multilayer perceptron training
0.011992
Comparative Analysis of Backpropagation and the Extended Kalman Filter for Training Multilayer Perceptrons · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

extended kalman filter · 0.0backpropagation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Comparative Analysis of Backpropagation and the Extended Kalman Filter for Training Multilayer Perceptrons
abstract
The relationship between backpropagation and extended Kalman filtering for training multilayer perceptrons is examined. These two techniques are compared theoretically and empirically using sensor imagery. Backpropagation is a technique from neural networks for assigning weights in a multilayer perceptron. An extended Kalman filter can also be used for this purpose. A brief review of the multilayer perceptron and these two training methods is provided. Then, it is shown that backpropagation is a degenerate form of the extended Kalman filter. The training rules are compared in two examples: an image classification problem using laser radar Doppler imagery and a target detection problem using absolute range images. In both examples, the backpropagation training algorithm is shown to be three orders of magnitude less costly than the extended Kalman filter algorithm in terms of a number of floating-point operations.>
Dennis W. Ruck, Steven K. Rogers, Matthew Kabrisky, Peter S. Maybeck, Mark E. Oxley
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.4