Michael A. Henning

dblp:73/5158 · also Michael Anthony Henning · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
100ranked-venue papers
54as first author
20since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-8185-067XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 97 · 53 first-author · 18 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Identifying open codes in trees and 4-cycle-free graphs of given maximum degree
abstract
International audience
Dipayan Chakraborty, Florent Foucaud, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2026 Edge general position in graphs: Graph products, integer linear programming and some applications
Zahra Hamed-Labbafian, Michael A. Henning, Mostafa Tavakoli
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2026 Reducing regular graphs to partition their vertices into a total dominating set and an independent dominating set
Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2026 Disjunctive domination in maximal outerplanar graphs
Michael A. Henning, Paras Maniya, Dinabandhu Pradhan
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2026 Approximation algorithm for the semitotal domination problem in unit disk graphs
abstract
The Minimum Semitotal Dominating Set (MSTDS) problem is a classical variant of the Minimum Dominating Set (MDS) problem. Given a graph G = ( V , E ) , the goal is to compute a minimum-cardinality vertex subset D ⊆ V such that (i) D is a dominating set, and (ii) for every vertex u in D has a partner v ∈ D within distance two (the semitotal property ), i.e, dist G ( u , v ) ≤ 2 . While the problem is NP-complete in general graphs, recent work has studied approximation algorithms in special graph classes, including unit disk graphs (UDGs). In this paper, we present a deterministic approximation algorithm for the MSTDS problem on UDGs in the graph-based input model, where the graph is provided explicitly without geometric coordinates. Our algorithm achieves a 5.75-approximation factor, improving upon the previous best 6-approximation due to Rout and Das (2024). The core of our algorithm is a multi-stage strategy that starts with a Maximal Independent Set (MIS) and iteratively satisfies the semitotal property through cost-effective vertex swaps and additions of new vertices to the MIS.
Michael A. Henning, Pawan K. Mishra, Kartik Sehgal, Shaurya M. Tripathi, Sridhar Tuli
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2026 Fault-tolerant resolving power domination of fractal cubic network
Savari Prabhu, A. K. Arulmozhi, Michael A. Henning, M. Arulperumjothi
J. Parallel Distributed Comput.3
2025 Paired-domination in binary trees
Aaron Gray, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2025 More on the complexity of defensive domination in graphs
Michael A. Henning, Arti Pandey, Vikash Tripathi
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2024 Common domination perfect graphs
Magda Dettlaff, Michael A. Henning, Jerzy Topp
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2024 A characterization of graphs whose vertex set can be partitioned into a total dominating set and an independent dominating set
Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2024 A characterization of graphs with given total coalition numbers
Michael A. Henning, Shahin N. Jogan
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2024 Algorithms and hardness results for edge total domination problem in graphs
Michael A. Henning, Arti Pandey, Gopika Sharma, Vikash Tripathi
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2023 Independent domination in outerplanar graphs
Wayne Goddard, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2023 Paired-domination game played on cycles
Aaron Gray, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2023 The Tuza-Vestergaard Theorem
abstract
Abstract. The transversal number [Formula: see text] of a hypergraph [Formula: see text] is the minimum number of vertices that intersect every edge of [Formula: see text]. A 6-uniform hypergraph has all edges of size 6. On 10 November 2000 Tuza and Vestergaard [ Discuss. Math. Graph Theory, 22 (2002), pp. 199–210] conjectured that if [Formula: see text] is a 3-regular 6-uniform hypergraph of order [Formula: see text], then [Formula: see text]. In this paper we prove this conjecture, which has become known as the Tuza–Vestergaard conjecture.
Michael A. Henning, Christian Löwenstein, Anders Yeo
SIAM J. Discret. Math.1
2023 Algorithmic aspects of paired disjunctive domination in graphs
Michael A. Henning, Arti Pandey, Vikash Tripathi
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2022 Domination and dominator colorings in planar graphs with small diameter
Wayne Goddard, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2021 Approximation Algorithm and Hardness Results for Defensive Domination in Graphs
Michael A. Henning, Arti Pandey, Vikash Tripathi
COCOA1
2021 A new upper bound on the total domination number in graphs with minimum degree six
Michael A. Henning, Anders Yeo
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2021 Lower bounds on Tuza constants for transversals in linear uniform hypergraphs
Michael A. Henning, Anders Yeo
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2020 Domination versus edge domination
Julien Baste, Maximilian Fürst, Michael A. Henning, Elena Mohr, Dieter Rautenbach
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2020 Total domination cover rubbling
Robert A. Beeler, Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning, Rodney Keaton
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2020 A 34-approximation of Vizing's conjecture for claw-free graphs
Bostjan Bresar, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2020 Maker-Breaker total domination game
Valentin Gledel, Michael A. Henning, Vesna Irsic Chenoweth, Sandi Klavzar
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2020 2-limited broadcast domination in subcubic graphs
Michael A. Henning, Gary MacGillivray, Frank Yang
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2020 Algorithm and hardness results on hop domination in graphs
Michael A. Henning, Saikat Pal, Dinabandhu Pradhan
Inf. Process. Lett.1
2020 Complexity and Algorithms for Semipaired Domination in Graphs
Michael A. Henning, Arti Pandey, Vikash Tripathi
Theory Comput. Syst.1
2020 Algorithmic aspects of upper paired-domination in graphs
Michael A. Henning, Dinabandhu Pradhan
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2019 Complexity and Algorithms for Semipaired Domination in Graphs
Michael A. Henning, Arti Pandey, Vikash Tripathi
IWOCA1
2019 On the total forcing number of a graph
Randy Davila, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2019 Uniquely restricted matchings in subcubic graphs
Maximilian Fürst, Michael A. Henning, Dieter Rautenbach
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2019 Perfect Italian domination in trees
Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2019 A characterization of double Roman trees
Michael A. Henning, Nader Jafari Rad
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2019 Algorithmic aspects of semitotal domination in graphs
Michael A. Henning, Arti Pandey
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2018 On upper bounds for the independent transversal domination number
Christoph Brause, Michael A. Henning, Kenta Ozeki, Ingo Schiermeyer, Elkin Vumar
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2018 The matcher game played in graphs
Wayne Goddard, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2018 Essential upper bounds on the total domination number
Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2018 Total domination stability in graphs
Michael A. Henning, Marcin Krzywkowski
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2018 Perfect Roman domination in trees
Michael A. Henning, William Klostermeyer, Gary MacGillivray
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2018 Game total domination critical graphs
Michael A. Henning, Sandi Klavzar, Douglas F. Rall
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2018 k-broadcast domination and k-multipacking
Michael A. Henning, Gary MacGillivray, Frank Yang
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2018 Bounding the Order of a Graph Using Its Diameter and Metric Dimension: A Study Through Tree Decompositions and VC Dimension
abstract
The metric dimension of a graph is the minimum size of a set of vertices such that each vertex is uniquely determined by the distances to the vertices of that set. Our aim is to upper-bound the order $n$ of a graph in terms of its diameter $d$ and metric dimension $k$. In general, the bound $n\leq d^k+k$ is known to hold. We prove a bound of the form $n=\mathcal{O}(kd^2)$ for trees and outerplanar graphs (for trees we determine the best possible bound and the corresponding extremal examples). More generally, for graphs having a tree decomposition of width $w$ and length $\ell$, we obtain a bound of the form $n=\mathcal{O}(kd^2(2\ell+1)^{3w+1})$. This implies in particular that $n=\mathcal{O}(kd^{\mathcal{O}(1)})$ for graphs of constant treewidth and $n=\mathcal{O}(f(k)d^2)$ for chordal graphs, where $f$ is a doubly exponential function. Using the notion of distance-VC dimension (introduced in 2014 by Bousquet and Thomassé) as a tool, we prove the bounds $n\leq (dk+1)^{t-1}+1$ for $K_t$-minor-free graphs and $n\leq (dk+1)^{d(3\cdot 2^{r}+2)}+1$ for graphs of rankwidth at most $r$.
Laurent Beaudou, Peter Dankelmann, Florent Foucaud, Michael A. Henning, Arnaud Mary, Aline Parreau
SIAM J. Discret. Math.4
2017 Partitioning the vertices of a cubic graph into two total dominating sets
Wyatt J. Desormeaux, Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2017 Italian domination in trees
Michael A. Henning, William Klostermeyer
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2017 Trees with equal total domination and game total domination numbers
Michael A. Henning, Douglas F. Rall
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2017 The game total domination problem is log-complete in PSPACE
Bostjan Bresar, Michael A. Henning
Inf. Process. Lett.2
2016 Game total domination for cycles and paths
Paul Dorbec, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2016 Locating-dominating sets in twin-free graphs
Florent Foucaud, Michael A. Henning, Christian Löwenstein, Thomas Sasse
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2016 Largest domination number and smallest independence number of forests with given degree sequence
Michael Gentner, Michael A. Henning, Dieter Rautenbach
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2016 Induced 2-regular subgraphs in k-chordal cubic graphs
Michael A. Henning, Felix Joos, Christian Löwenstein, Dieter Rautenbach
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2016 Trees with large m-eternal domination number
Michael A. Henning, William Klostermeyer
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2016 Transversal Game on Hypergraphs and the 3/4-Conjecture on the Total Domination Game
abstract
The $\frac{3}{4}$-Game Total Domination Conjecture posed by Henning, Klavžar, and Rall [Combinatorica, (2016)] states that if $G$ is a graph on $n$ vertices in which every component contains at least three vertices, then $\gamma_{tg}(G) \le \frac{3}{4}n$, where $\gamma_{tg}(G)$ denotes the game total domination number of $G$. Motivated by this conjecture, we raise the problem to a higher level by introducing a transversal game in hypergraphs. We define the game transversal number, $\tau_g(H)$, of a hypergraph $H$, and prove that if every edge of $H$ has size at least 2, and $H \ncong C_4$, then $\tau_g(H) \le \frac{4}{11}(n_{_H}+m_{_H})$, where $n_{_H}$ and $m_{_H}$ denote the number of vertices and edges, respectively, in $H$. Further, we characterize the hypergraphs achieving equality in this bound. As an application of this result, we prove that if $G$ is a graph on $n$ vertices with minimum degree at least 2, then $\gamma_{{tg}}(G) < \frac{8}{11} n$. As a consequence of this result, the $\frac{3}{4}$-Game Total Domination Conjecture is true over the class of graphs with minimum degree at least 2.
Csilla Bujtás, Michael A. Henning, Zsolt Tuza
SIAM J. Discret. Math.2
2016 Domination Game: A proof of the 3/5-Conjecture for Graphs with Minimum Degree at Least Two
abstract
In the domination game on a graph $G$, the players Dominator and Staller alternately select vertices of $G$. Each vertex chosen must strictly increase the number of vertices dominated. This process eventually produces a dominating set of $G$; Dominator aims to minimize the size of this set, while Staller aims to maximize it. The size of the dominating set produced under optimal play is the game domination number of $G$, denoted by $\gamma_g (G)$. In this paper, we prove that $\gamma_g(G) \le 2n/3$ for every $n$-vertex isolate-free graph $G$. When $G$ has minimum degree at least $2$, we prove the stronger bound $\gamma_g(G) \le 3n/5$; this resolves a special case of a conjecture due to Kinnersley, West, and Zamani [SIAM J. Discrete Math., 27 (2013), pp. 2090--2107]. Finally, we prove that if $G$ is an $n$-vertex isolate-free graph with $\ell$ vertices of degree 1, then $\gamma_g(G) \le 3n/5 + \left \lceil \ell/2 \right \rceil + 1$; in the course of establishing this result, we answer a question of Brešar et al. [Discrete Math., 330 (2014), pp. 1--10].
Michael A. Henning, Bill Kinnersley
SIAM J. Discret. Math.1
2015 Domination versus disjunctive domination in trees
Michael A. Henning, Sinclair A. Marcon
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2015 A characterization of the non-trivial diameter two graphs of minimum size
Michael A. Henning, Justin Southey
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2015 Signed Roman k-domination in trees
Michael A. Henning, Lutz Volkmann
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2015 Trees with large neighborhood total domination number
Michael A. Henning, Kirsti Wash
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2015 Total Transversals in Hypergraphs and Their Applications
abstract
Let $H = (V,E)$ be a hypergraph with vertex set $V$ and edge set $E$ of order ${n_{_H}} = |V|$ and size ${m_{_H}} = |E|$. The hypergraph $H$ is $k$-uniform if every edge of $H$ has size $k$. Two vertices in $H$ are adjacent if they belong to a common edge in $H$. A transversal in $H$ is a subset of vertices in $H$ that has a nonempty intersection with every edge of $H$. A total transversal in $H$ is a transversal $T$ in $H$ with the additional property that every vertex in $T$ is adjacent to some other vertex of $T$. The total transversal number $\tau_t(H)$ of $H$ is the minimum cardinality of a total transversal in $H$. For $k \ge 2$, let $b_k = \sup_{H \in {\cal H}_k} \, {\tau_t}(H) / ({n_{_H}} + {m_{_H}})$, where ${\cal H}_k$ denotes the class of all $k$-uniform hypergraphs containing no isolated vertices or isolated edges or multiple edges. It is known that $b_2 = 2/5$, $b_3 = 1/3$, $b_4 \le 1/3$, and $b_5 \le 2/7$. In this paper, we show that $b_4 = 2/7$ and $b_6 \le 1/4$. Further, for $k \ge 7$, we show that $b_7 \le 2/9$. These results on total transversals have applications in total domination in hypergraphs. A total dominating set in $H$ is a subset of vertices $D \subseteq V$ such that every vertex in $H$ is adjacent to some vertex in $D$. The total domination number $\gamma_t(H)$ is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set in $H$. The following relationship between the total transversal number and the total domination number of uniform hypergraphs is known: For $k \ge 3$ and $H \in {\cal H}_k$, we have ${\gamma_t}(H) \le ( \max \{ \frac{2 }{k+1}, b_{k-1} \} ) \times {n_{_H}}$. As a consequence of our results on the total transversal number, for $k \in \{2,3,4,5,6,7,8\}$ and a hypergraph $H \in {\cal H}_k$, we have ${\gamma_t}(H) \le 2{n_{_H}}/(k+1)$.
Michael A. Henning, Anders Yeo
SIAM J. Discret. Math.1
2014 Improved bounds on the domination number of a tree
Wyatt J. Desormeaux, Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2014 A characterization of P5-free, diameter-2-critical graphs
Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2014 An improved lower bound on the independence number of a graph
Michael A. Henning, Christian Löwenstein
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2014 Independent domination in subcubic bipartite graphs of girth at least six
Michael A. Henning, Christian Löwenstein, Dieter Rautenbach
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2014 Graphs with maximum size and given paired-domination number
Michael A. Henning, John McCoy, Justin Southey
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2014 A new lower bound for the total domination number in graphs proving a Graffiti.pc Conjecture
Michael A. Henning, Anders Yeo
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2013 Relating the annihilation number and the total domination number of a tree
Wyatt J. Desormeaux, Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2013 Bounds on the connected domination number of a graph
Wyatt J. Desormeaux, Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2013 Equality in a linear Vizing-like relation that relates the size and total domination number of a graph
Michael A. Henning, Ernst J. Joubert
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2013 Bounds on neighborhood total domination in graphs
Michael A. Henning, Nader Jafari Rad
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2013 Generalized Power Domination in Regular Graphs
abstract
In this paper, we continue the study of power domination in graphs (see [T. W. Haynes et al., SIAM J. Discrete Math., 15 (2002), pp. 519--529; P. Dorbec et al., SIAM J. Discrete Math., 22 (2008), pp. 554--567; A. Aazami et al., SIAM J. Discrete Math., 23 (2009), pp. 1382--1399]). Power domination in graphs was birthed from the problem of monitoring an electric power system by placing as few measurement devices in the system as possible. A set of vertices is defined to be a power dominating set of a graph if every vertex and every edge in the system is monitored by the set following a set of rules (according to Kirschoff laws) for power system monitoring. The minimum cardinality of a power dominating set of a graph is its power domination number. We show that the power domination of a connected cubic graph on $n$ vertices different from $K_{3,3}$ is at most $n/4$ and this bound is tight. More generally, we show that for $k \ge 1$, the $k$-power domination number of a connected $(k+2)$-regular graph on $n$ vertices different from $K_{k+2,k+2}$ is at most $n/(k+3)$, where the $1$-power domination number is the ordinary power domination number. We show that these bounds are tight.
Paul Dorbec, Michael A. Henning, Christian Löwenstein, Mickaël Montassier, André Raspaud
SIAM J. Discret. Math.2
2012 Directed domination in oriented graphs
Yair Caro, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2012 A characterization of diameter-2-critical graphs whose complements are diamond-free
Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2012 Multiple factor Nordhaus-Gaddum type results for domination and total domination
Michael A. Henning, Ernst J. Joubert, Justin Southey
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2012 Total domination in inflated graphs
Michael A. Henning, Adel P. Kazemi
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2012 Hypergraphs with large domination number and with edge sizes at least three
Michael A. Henning, Christian Löwenstein
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2012 On α-total domination in graphs
Michael A. Henning, Nader Jafari Rad
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2012 Locating-total domination in graphs
Michael A. Henning, Nader Jafari Rad
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2012 Vertex Disjoint Cycles of Different Length in Digraphs
abstract
Thomassen [Combinatorica, 3 (1983), pp. 393–396] proved that every digraph with minimum out-degree at least three has two vertex disjoint cycles. There are examples of 3-regular digraphs where all pairs of vertex disjoint cycles have the same length. In this paper we raise the conjectures that all 3-regular bipartite digraphs and all digraphs with minimum degree at least four have two vertex disjoint cycles of different length. We give support for our conjectures by proving that all 4-regular digraphs do indeed have two vertex disjoint cycles of different length. We furthermore discuss consequences of our results and conjectures as well as arc-weighted versions of our conjecture.
Michael A. Henning, Anders Yeo
SIAM J. Discret. Math.1
2011 An extremal problem for total domination stable graphs upon edge removal
Wyatt J. Desormeaux, Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2011 Total domination changing and stable graphs upon vertex removal
Wyatt J. Desormeaux, Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2011 Total domination dot-critical graphs
Michael A. Henning, Nader Jafari Rad
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2011 A note on total reinforcement in graphs
Michael A. Henning, Nader Jafari Rad, Joanna Raczek
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2010 Total domination critical and stable graphs upon edge removal
Wyatt J. Desormeaux, Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2010 k-tuple total domination in graphs
Michael A. Henning, Adel P. Kazemi
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2010 Disjoint dominating and total dominating sets in graphs
Michael A. Henning, Christian Löwenstein, Dieter Rautenbach, Justin Southey
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2010 Properties of total domination edge-critical graphs
Michael A. Henning, Lucas C. van der Merwe
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2010 Strong Transversals in Hypergraphs and Double Total Domination in Graphs
abstract
Let H be a 3-uniform hypergraph of order n and size m, and let T be a subset of vertices of H. The set T is a strong transversal in H if T contains at least two vertices from every edge of H. The strong transversal number $\tau_s(H)$ of H is the minimum size of a strong transversal in H. We show that $7\tau_s(H)\leq4n+2m$, and we characterize the hypergraphs that achieve equality in this bound. In particular, we show that the Fano plane is the only connected 3-uniform hypergraph H of order $n\geq6$ and size m that achieves equality in this bound. A set S of vertices in a graph G is a double total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to at least two vertices in S. The minimum cardinality of a double total dominating set of G is the double total domination number $\gamma_{\times2,t}(G)$ of G. Let G be a connected graph of order n with minimum degree at least three. As an application of our hypergraph results, we show that $\gamma_{\times2,t}(G)\leq6n/7$ with equality if and only if G is the Heawood graph (equivalently, the incidence bipartite graph of the Fano plane). Further if G is not the Heawood graph, we show that $\gamma_{\times2,t}(G)\leq11n/13$, while if G is a cubic graph different from the Heawood graph, we show that $\gamma_{\times2,t}(G)\leq5n/6$, and this bound is sharp.
Michael A. Henning, Anders Yeo
SIAM J. Discret. Math.1
2009 Bounds relating the weakly connected domination number to the total domination number and the matching number
Johannes H. Hattingh, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2009 Domination, radius, and minimum degree
Michael A. Henning, Simon Mukwembi
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2009 On total domination vertex critical graphs of high connectivity
Michael A. Henning, Nader Jafari Rad
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2009 Locating and paired-dominating sets in graphs
John McCoy, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2008 Total domination in partitioned trees and partitioned graphs with minimum degree two
Allan Frendrup, Michael A. Henning, Preben D. Vestergaard
J. Glob. Optim.2
2006 A note on power domination in grid graphs
Michael Dorfling, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2006 Locating and total dominating sets in trees
Teresa W. Haynes, Michael A. Henning, Jamie Howard
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2006 Trees with Equal Domination and Restrained Domination Numbers
Peter Dankelmann, Johannes H. Hattingh, Michael A. Henning, Henda C. Swart
J. Glob. Optim.3
2004 The average connectivity of a digraph
Michael A. Henning, Ortrud R. Oellermann
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2002 Domination in Graphs Applied to Electric Power Networks
abstract
The problem of monitoring an electric power system by placing as few measurement devices in the system as possible is closely related to the well-known vertex covering and dominating set problems in graphs. We consider the graph theoretical representation of this problem as a variation of the dominating set problem and define a set S to be a power dominating set of a graph if every vertex and every edge in the system is monitored by the set S (following a set of rules for power system monitoring). The minimum cardinality of a power dominating set of a graph G is the power domination number $\gamma_P(G)$. We show that the power dominating set (PDS) problem is NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite graphs or chordal graphs. On the other hand, we give a linear algorithm to solve the PDS for trees. In addition, we investigate theoretical properties of $\gamma_P(T)$ in trees T.
Teresa W. Haynes, Sandra Mitchell Hedetniemi, Stephen T. Hedetniemi, Michael A. Henning
SIAM J. Discret. Math.4
1999 Generalized eccentricity, radius, and diameter in graphs
abstract
For a vertex v and a (k − 1)-element subset P of vertices of a graph, one can define the distance from v to P in various ways, including the minimum, average, and maximum distance from v to P. Associated with each of these distances, one can define the k-eccentricity of the vertex v as the maximum distance over all P and the k-eccentricity of the set P as the maximum distance over all v. If k = 2, one is back with the normal eccentricity. We study here the properties of these eccentricity measures, especially bounds on the associated radius (minimum k-eccentricity) and diameter (maximum k-eccentricity). © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Networks 34: 312–319, 1999
Peter Dankelmann, Wayne Goddard, Michael A. Henning, Henda C. Swart
Networks3
1998 Some General Aspects of the Framing Number of a Digraph
Michael A. Henning, Hiren Maharaj
Discret. Appl. Math.1
1996 The Algorithmic Complexity of Minus Domination in Graphs
Jean E. Dunbar, Wayne Goddard, Stephen T. Hedetniemi, Alice A. McRae, Michael A. Henning
Discret. Appl. Math.5
1996 An Algorithm to Find Two Distance Domination Parameters in a Graph
Gerd Fricke, Michael A. Henning, Ortrud R. Oellermann, Henda C. Swart
Discret. Appl. Math.2