Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yoshihiro Ishikawa

dblp:73/547 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Cellular and mobile networks · 36% Network performance modeling · 36% Physical-layer communications · 28%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cellular and mobile networks
call admission control
0.011997
Capacity Design and Performance of Call Admission Control in Cellular CDMA Systems · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1997
Network performance modeling › teletraffic engineering
capacity engineering
0.011997
Capacity Design and Performance of Call Admission Control in Cellular CDMA Systems · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1997
Physical-layer communications › multiple access
CDMA systems
0.011997
Capacity Design and Performance of Call Admission Control in Cellular CDMA Systems · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1997
Cellular and mobile networks
cellular network performance
0.011997
Capacity Design and Performance of Call Admission Control in Cellular CDMA Systems · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1997
Network performance modeling › teletraffic engineering
grade of service
0.011997
Capacity Design and Performance of Call Admission Control in Cellular CDMA Systems · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

traffic theory · 0.0computer simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 CDMA packet transmission control in the third generation mobile communications system
abstract
Code division multiple access (CDMA) is the most promising access scheme for the 3rd generation mobile communications system. Because it is indispensable in coping with multimedia communications in the 3rd generation system, CDMA packet transmission with high transmission efficiency over a wide variety of traffic characteristics is also necessary for the system. There are two kinds of packet transmission, the reservation method (RM) and the contention method (CM), used as media access control (MAC) methods in radio packet transmission. The two MAC methods are evaluated and compared based on capacity. As a result, it is shown that it is necessary to switch MAC methods depending on the traffic characteristics. Moreover, this paper denotes a switching method between physical channels and a handover procedure, and quantitatively evaluates the switching frequency between physical channels and the hard handover (HHO) frequency.
Minami Nagatsuka, Yoshihiro Ishikawa, Junichirou Hagiwara, Takehiro Nakamura, Seizo Onoe
PIMRC2
1997 Capacity Design and Performance of Call Admission Control in Cellular CDMA Systems
abstract
Since code-division multiple-access (CDMA) capacity is interference limited, call admission control (CAC) must guarantee both a grade of service (GoS), i.e., the blocking rate, and a quality of service (QoS), i.e., the loss probability of communication quality. This paper describes the development of a new capacity design method based on these two concepts. Theoretical expressions for GoS and QoS as functions of traffic intensity and CAC thresholds are first derived from the traffic theory viewpoint, and then a design method using these expressions is presented. At that time, two strategies for CAC are assumed. One is based on the number of users, and the other is based on the interference level. Computer simulation results are presented that strongly support the proposed design method. Furthermore, numerical examples and a performance comparison of the two strategies considering various propagation parameters, nonuniform traffic distributions, and various transmission rates are shown.
Yoshihiro Ishikawa, Narumi Umeda
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.1