Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Geoffrey K. Pullum

dblp:73/5500 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
0000-0002-7748-8847ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 50% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data models and query languages · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automata and formal languages › formal grammars
context-free grammar
0.011983
Context-Freeness and the Computer Processing of Human Languages · ACL 1983
Automata and formal languages › grammar formalisms
generative capacity
0.011983
Context-Freeness and the Computer Processing of Human Languages · ACL 1983
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
logical form
0.011982
Processing English with a Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar · ACL 1982
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.011982
Processing English with a Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar · ACL 1982
Automata and formal languages › context-free languages
recognition complexity
0.011983
Context-Freeness and the Computer Processing of Human Languages · ACL 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

montague semantics · 0.0generalized phrase structure grammar · 0.0formal language theory · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Tree Adjoining Grammars: Formalisms, Linguistic Analysis and Processing edited by Anne Abeillé and Owen Rambow
Geoffrey K. Pullum
Comput. Linguistics1
1988 Category Structures
Gerald Gazdar, Geoffrey K. Pullum, Robert Carpenter, Ewan Klein, Thomas E. Hukari, Robert D. Levine
Comput. Linguistics2
1984 Syntactic And Semantic Parsability
abstract
This paper surveys some issues that arise in the study of the syntax and semantics of natural languages (NL's) and have potential relevance to the automatic recognition, parsing, and translation of NL's. An attempt is made to take into account the fact that parsing is scarcely ever thought about with reference to syntax alone; semantic ulterior motives always underly the assignment of a syntactic structure to a sentence. First I consider the state of the art with respect to arguments about the language-theoretic complexity of NL's: whether NL's are regular sets, deterministic CFL's, CFL's, or whatever. While English still appears to be a CFL as far as I can tell, new arguments (some not yet published) appear to show for the first time that some languages are not CFL's. Next I consider the question of how semantic filtering affects the power of grammars. Then I turn to a brief consideration of some syntactic proposals that employ more or less modest extensions of the power of context-free grammars.
Geoffrey K. Pullum
COLING1
1984 On Two Recent Attempts to Show that English is Not a CFL
Geoffrey K. Pullum
Comput. Linguistics1
1983 Context-Freeness and the Computer Processing of Human Languages
abstract
Context-free grammars, far from having insufficient expressive power for the description of human fan Kuages, may he overly powerful, along three dimensions;(i) weak generative capacity: there exists an interesting proper subset of the CFL's, the profligate CFL's, within which no human language appears to fall; (2) strong generative capacity: human languages can be appropriately described in terms of a proper subset of the CF-PSG's, namely those with the ECPO property; (3) time complexity: the recent controversy about the importance of a low deterministic polynomial time bound on the recognition problem for human languages is misdirected, since an appropriately restrictive theory would guarantee even more, namely a linear bound.
Geoffrey K. Pullum
ACL1
1982 Processing English with a Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar
abstract
This paper describes a natural language processing system implemented at Hewlett-Packard's Computer Research Center. The system's main components are: a Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar (GPSG); a top-down parser; a logic transducer that outputs a first-order logical representation; and a "disambiguator" that uses sortal information to convert "normal-form" first-order logical expressions into the query language for HIRE, a relational database hosted in the SPHERE system. We argue that theoretical developments in GPSG syntax and in Montague semantics have specific advantages to bring to this domain of computational linguistics. The syntax and semantics of the system are totally domain-independent, and thus, in principle, highly portable. We discuss the prospects for extending domain-independence to the lexical semantics as well, and thus to the logical semantic representations.
Jean Mark Gawron, Jonathan King, John Lamping, Egon E. Loebner, E. Anne Paulson, Geoffrey K. Pullum, Ivan A. Sag, Thomas Wasow
ACL6