EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Geoffrey K. Pullum
dblp:73/5500
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
0000-0002-7748-8847ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automata and formal languages · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 50% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data models and query languages · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automata and formal languages › formal grammars
context-free grammar |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | Context-Freeness and the Computer Processing of Human Languages · ACL 1983 |
Automata and formal languages › grammar formalisms
generative capacity |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | Context-Freeness and the Computer Processing of Human Languages · ACL 1983 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
logical form |
0.0 | 1 | 1982 | Processing English with a Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar · ACL 1982 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 1982 | Processing English with a Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar · ACL 1982 |
Automata and formal languages › context-free languages
recognition complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | Context-Freeness and the Computer Processing of Human Languages · ACL 1983 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
montague semantics · 0.0generalized phrase structure grammar · 0.0formal language theory · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | Tree Adjoining Grammars: Formalisms, Linguistic Analysis and Processing edited by Anne Abeillé and Owen Rambow
Geoffrey K. Pullum |
Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 1988 | Category Structures
Gerald Gazdar, Geoffrey K. Pullum, Robert Carpenter, Ewan Klein, Thomas E. Hukari, Robert D. Levine |
Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 1984 | Syntactic And Semantic ParsabilityabstractThis paper surveys some issues that arise in the study of the syntax and semantics of natural languages (NL's) and have potential relevance to the automatic recognition, parsing, and translation of NL's. An attempt is made to take into account the fact that parsing is scarcely ever thought about with reference to syntax alone; semantic ulterior motives always underly the assignment of a syntactic structure to a sentence. First I consider the state of the art with respect to arguments about the language-theoretic complexity of NL's: whether NL's are regular sets, deterministic CFL's, CFL's, or whatever. While English still appears to be a CFL as far as I can tell, new arguments (some not yet published) appear to show for the first time that some languages are not CFL's. Next I consider the question of how semantic filtering affects the power of grammars. Then I turn to a brief consideration of some syntactic proposals that employ more or less modest extensions of the power of context-free grammars. Geoffrey K. Pullum |
COLING | 1 |
| 1984 | On Two Recent Attempts to Show that English is Not a CFL
Geoffrey K. Pullum |
Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 1983 | Context-Freeness and the Computer Processing of Human LanguagesabstractContext-free grammars, far from having insufficient expressive power for the description of human fan Kuages, may he overly powerful, along three dimensions;(i) weak generative capacity: there exists an interesting proper subset of the CFL's, the profligate CFL's, within which no human language appears to fall; (2) strong generative capacity: human languages can be appropriately described in terms of a proper subset of the CF-PSG's, namely those with the ECPO property; (3) time complexity: the recent controversy about the importance of a low deterministic polynomial time bound on the recognition problem for human languages is misdirected, since an appropriately restrictive theory would guarantee even more, namely a linear bound. Geoffrey K. Pullum |
ACL | 1 |
| 1982 | Processing English with a Generalized Phrase Structure GrammarabstractThis paper describes a natural language processing system implemented at Hewlett-Packard's Computer Research Center. The system's main components are: a Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar (GPSG); a top-down parser; a logic transducer that outputs a first-order logical representation; and a "disambiguator" that uses sortal information to convert "normal-form" first-order logical expressions into the query language for HIRE, a relational database hosted in the SPHERE system. We argue that theoretical developments in GPSG syntax and in Montague semantics have specific advantages to bring to this domain of computational linguistics. The syntax and semantics of the system are totally domain-independent, and thus, in principle, highly portable. We discuss the prospects for extending domain-independence to the lexical semantics as well, and thus to the logical semantic representations. Jean Mark Gawron, Jonathan King, John Lamping, Egon E. Loebner, E. Anne Paulson, Geoffrey K. Pullum, Ivan A. Sag, Thomas Wasow |
ACL | 6 |