Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Laura Pearlman

dblp:73/821 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-0749-4707ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 7 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
5 papers
Distributed systems · 75% Storage systems · 16% High-performance computing · 9%
Network and information security
1 paper
Cyber-physical and IoT security · 77% Web and mobile security · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
grid computing
0.132004
Distributed Hybrid Earthquake Engineering Experiments: Experiences with a Ground-Shaking Grid Application · HPDC 2004
Showcasing the Features and Capabilities of NEESgrid: A Grid Based System for the Earthquake Engineering Domain · HPDC 2004
Security for Grid Services · HPDC 2003
Cyber-physical and IoT security
grid security
0.012003
Security for Grid Services · HPDC 2003
Distributed systems › grid computing
data grid
0.012003
A Metadata Catalog Service for Data Intensive Applications · SC 2003
Storage systems
metadata management
0.012003
A Metadata Catalog Service for Data Intensive Applications · SC 2003
Distributed systems
distributed data processing
0.012002
GriPhyN and LIGO, Building a Virtual Data Grid for Gravitational Wave Scientists · HPDC 2002
Web and mobile security › web application security
web services security
0.012003
Security for Grid Services · HPDC 2003
High-performance computing › data-intensive computing
data-intensive applications
0.012003
A Metadata Catalog Service for Data Intensive Applications · SC 2003
Distributed systems › grid computing
virtual organizations
0.012003
Security for Grid Services · HPDC 2003
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
0.012002
GriPhyN and LIGO, Building a Virtual Data Grid for Gravitational Wave Scientists · HPDC 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

grid application · 0.1globus toolkit · 0.0grid middleware · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 An Integrated Privacy Preserving Collaborative Analytics Platform: The PCORnet pSCANNER-PopMedNet TM Software Suite
Michael E. Matheny, Dax M. Westerman, Laura Pearlman, Josh Gieringer, Xiaoqian Jiang, Claudiu Farcas, Tara K. Knight, Shuang Wang 0002, Amy Perkins, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Bill Clarke, Daniella Meeker
AMIA3
2015 A system to build distributed multivariate models and manage disparate data sharing policies: implementation in the scalable national network for effectiveness research
abstract
BACKGROUND: Centralized and federated models for sharing data in research networks currently exist. To build multivariate data analysis for centralized networks, transfer of patient-level data to a central computation resource is necessary. The authors implemented distributed multivariate models for federated networks in which patient-level data is kept at each site and data exchange policies are managed in a study-centric manner. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to implement infrastructure that supports the functionality of some existing research networks (e.g., cohort discovery, workflow management, and estimation of multivariate analytic models on centralized data) while adding additional important new features, such as algorithms for distributed iterative multivariate models, a graphical interface for multivariate model specification, synchronous and asynchronous response to network queries, investigator-initiated studies, and study-based control of staff, protocols, and data sharing policies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the requirements gathered from statisticians, administrators, and investigators from multiple institutions, the authors developed infrastructure and tools to support multisite comparative effectiveness studies using web services for multivariate statistical estimation in the SCANNER federated network. RESULTS: The authors implemented massively parallel (map-reduce) computation methods and a new policy management system to enable each study initiated by network participants to define the ways in which data may be processed, managed, queried, and shared. The authors illustrated the use of these systems among institutions with highly different policies and operating under different state laws. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Federated research networks need not limit distributed query functionality to count queries, cohort discovery, or independently estimated analytic models. Multivariate analyses can be efficiently and securely conducted without patient-level data transport, allowing institutions with strict local data storage requirements to participate in sophisticated analyses based on federated research networks.
Daniella Meeker, Xiaoqian Jiang, Michael E. Matheny, Claudiu Farcas, Mike D'Arcy, Laura Pearlman, Lavanya Nookala, Michele E. Day, Katherine K. Kim, Hyeon-Eui Kim, Aziz A. Boxwala, Robert El-Kareh, Grace Kuo, Frederic S. Resnic, Carl Kesselman, Lucila Ohno-Machado
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.6
2009 Interoperation of world-wide production e-Science infrastructures
abstract
Abstract Many production Grid and e‐Science infrastructures have begun to offer services to end‐users during the past several years with an increasing number of scientific applications that require access to a wide variety of resources and services in multiple Grids. Therefore, the Grid Interoperation Now—Community Group of the Open Grid Forum—organizes and manages interoperation efforts among those production Grid infrastructures to reach the goal of a world‐wide Grid vision on a technical level in the near future. This contribution highlights fundamental approaches of the group and discusses open standards in the context of production e‐Science infrastructures. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Morris Riedel, Erwin Laure, Thomas Soddemann, Laurence Field, John-Paul Navarro, James Casey, Maarten Litmaath, Jean-Philippe Baud, Birger Koblitz, Charles E. Catlett, Dane Skow, Cindy Zheng, Philip M. Papadopoulos, Mason J. Katz, Neha Sharma 0001, Oxana Smirnova, Balázs Kónya, Peter W. Arzberger, Frank Würthwein, Abhishek Singh Rana, Terrence Martin, M. Wan, Von Welch, Tony Rimovsky, Steven J. Newhouse, Andrea Vanni, Yoshio Tanaka, Yusuke Tanimura, Tsutomu Ikegami, David Abramson 0001, Colin Enticott, Graham Jenkins, Ruth Pordes, Steven Timm, Gidon Moont, Mona Aggarwal, Dave Colling, Olivier van der Aa, Alex Sim, Vijaya Natarajan, Arie Shoshani, Junmin Gu, Gerson Galang, Riccardo Zappi, Luca Magnoni, Vincenzo Ciaschini, Michele Pace, Valerio Venturi, Moreno Marzolla, Paolo Andreetto, Robert Cowles, Shaowen Wang 0001, Yuji Saeki, Hitoshi Sato, Satoshi Matsuoka, Putchong Uthayopas, Somsak Sriprayoonsakul, Oscar Koeroo, Matthew Viljoen, Laura Pearlman, Stephen Pickles, David Wallom, Glenn Moloney, Jerome Lauret, Jim Marsteller, Paul Sheldon, Surya Pathak, Shaun De Witt, Jirí Mencák, Jens Jensen, Matt Hodges, Derek Ross, Sugree Phatanapherom, Gilbert Netzer, Anders Rhod Gregersen, Mike Jones 0002, Péter Kacsuk, Achim Streit, Daniel Mallmann, Felix Wolf 0001, Thomas Lippert, Thierry Delaitre, Eduardo Huedo, Neil Geddes
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp.61
2006 Monitoring the Earth System Grid with MDS4
abstract
In production Grids for scientific applications, service and resource failures must be detected and addressed quickly. In this paper, we describe the monitoring infrastructure used by the Earth System Grid (ESG) project, a scientific collaboration that supports global climate research. ESG uses the Globus Toolkit Monitoring and Discovery System (MDS4) to monitor its resources. We describe how the MDS4 Index Service collects information about ESG resources and how the MDS4 Trigger Service checks specified failure conditions and notifies system administrators when failures occur. We present monitoring statistics for May 2006 and describe our experiences using MDS4 to monitor ESG resources over the last two years.
Ann L. Chervenak, Jennifer M. Schopf, Laura Pearlman, Mei-Hui Su, Shishir Bharathi, Luca Cinquini, Mike D'Arcy, Neill Miller, David E. Bernholdt
e-Science3
2006 Streamlining Grid Operations: Definition and Deployment of a Portal-based User Registration Service
Ian T. Foster, Veronika Nefedova, Mehran Ahsant, Rachana Ananthakrishnan, Liming Lee, Ravi K. Madduri, Olle Mulmo, Laura Pearlman, Frank Siebenlist
J. Grid Comput.8
2004 Showcasing the Features and Capabilities of NEESgrid: A Grid Based System for the Earthquake Engineering Domain
Sridhar Gullapalli, Shirley Dyke, Paul Hubbard, Doru Marcusiu, Laura Pearlman, Charles R. Severance
HPDC5
2004 Distributed Hybrid Earthquake Engineering Experiments: Experiences with a Ground-Shaking Grid Application
Laura Pearlman, Carl Kesselman, Sridhar Gullapalli, B. F. Spencer Jr., Joe Futrelle, Kathleen Ricker, Ian T. Foster, Paul Hubbard, Charles R. Severance
HPDC1
2004 Grid-Based Metadata Services
Ewa Deelman, Malcolm P. Atkinson 0001, Ann L. Chervenak, Neil P. Chue Hong, Carl Kesselman, Sonal Patil, Laura Pearlman, Mei-Hui Su
SSDBM8
2003 Security for Grid Services
abstract
Grid computing is concerned with the sharing and coordinated use of diverse resources in distributed "virtual organizations." The dynamic and multiinstitutional nature of these environments introduces challenging security issues that demand new technical approaches. In particular, one must deal with diverse local mechanisms, support dynamic creation of services, and enable dynamic creation of trust domains. We describe how these issues are addressed in two generations of the Globus Toolkit/spl reg/. First, we review the Globus Toolkit version 2 (GT2) approach; then we describe new approaches developed to support the Globus Toolkit version 3 (GT3) implementation of the Open Grid Services Architecture, an initiative that is recasting Grid concepts within a service-oriented framework based on Web services. GT3's security implementation uses Web services security mechanisms for credential exchange and other purposes, and introduces a tight least-privilege model that avoids the need for any privileged network service.
Von Welch, Frank Siebenlist, Ian T. Foster, John Bresnahan, Karl Czajkowski, Jarek Gawor, Carl Kesselman, Sam Meder, Laura Pearlman, Steven Tuecke
HPDC9
2003 A Metadata Catalog Service for Data Intensive Applications
abstract
Advances in computational, storage and network technologies as well as middle ware such as the Globus Toolkit allow scientists to expand the sophistication and scope of data-intensive applications. These applications produce and analyze terabytes and petabytes of data that are distributed in millions of files or objects. To manage these large data sets efficiently, metadata or descriptive information about the data needs to be managed. There are various types of metadata, and it is likely that a range of metadata services will exist in Grid environments that are specialized for particular types of metadata cataloguing and discovery. In this paper, we present the design of a Metadata Catalog Service (MCS) that provides a mechanism for storing and accessing descriptive metadata and allows users to query for data items based on desired attributes. We describe our experience in using the MCS with several applications and present a scalability study of the service.
Shishir Bharathi, Ann L. Chervenak, Ewa Deelman, Carl Kesselman, Mary Manohar, Sonal Patil, Laura Pearlman
SC8
2002 GriPhyN and LIGO, Building a Virtual Data Grid for Gravitational Wave Scientists
abstract
Many Physics experiments today generate large volumes of data. That data is then processed in a variety of ways in order to achieve the understanding of fundamental physical phenomena. The goal of the NSF-funded GriPhyN project (Grid Physics Network) is to enable scientists to seamlessly access data whether it is raw experimental data or a data product which is a result of further processing. GriPhyN provides a new degree of transparency in how data-handling and processing capabilities are integrated to deliver data products to end-users or applications, so that requests for such products are easily mapped into computation and/or data access at multiple locations. GriPhyN refers to the set of all data products available to the user as virtual data. Among the physics applications participating in the project is the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO), which is being built to observe the gravitational waves predicted by general relativity. We describe our initial design and prototype of a virtual data Grid for LIGO.
Ewa Deelman, Carl Kesselman, Gaurang Mehta, Leila Meshkat, Laura Pearlman, Kent Blackburn, Phil Ehrens, Albert Lazzarini, Roy Williams, Scott Koranda
HPDC5