Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tamarah Arons
dblp:73/832
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 8 · 7 first-authorTheory of computation · 6 · 5 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Electronic design automation · 54% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 46% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Concurrent programming · 67% Program verification · 33% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking
hardware verification |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | Formal Verification of Backward Compatibility of Microcode · CAV 2005 Verification of an Advanced mips-Type Out-of-Order Execution Algorithm · CAV 2004 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
microprogramming |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Formal Verification of Backward Compatibility of Microcode · CAV 2005 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › processor verification
microarchitecture verification |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Verification of an Advanced mips-Type Out-of-Order Execution Algorithm · CAV 2004 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
out-of-order execution |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Verification of an Advanced mips-Type Out-of-Order Execution Algorithm · CAV 2004 |
Program verification
concurrent program verification |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Using Timestamping and History Variables to Verify Sequential Consistency · CAV 2001 |
Concurrent programming
memory models |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Using Timestamping and History Variables to Verify Sequential Consistency · CAV 2001 |
Concurrent programming › memory models
sequential consistency |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Using Timestamping and History Variables to Verify Sequential Consistency · CAV 2001 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
parameterized verification |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Parameterized Verification with Automatically Computed Inductive Assertions · CAV 2001 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | A Methodology for the Verification of a "System on Chip" · DAC 1999 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification
system-on-chip verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | A Methodology for the Verification of a "System on Chip" · DAC 1999 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification
verification methodology |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | A Methodology for the Verification of a "System on Chip" · DAC 1999 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
formal verification · 0.2timestamping · 0.0inductive assertions · 0.0history variables · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Efficient Symbolic Simulation of Low Level SoftwareabstractSymbolic execution has long been a staple technique for formal hardware verification. Its application to software requires methods for dealing with software specific complexities. In this paper we elaborate methods for the efficient symbolic simulation of embedded software; some methods are new, others are improvements of existing methods. Using these techniques we have been able to symbolically execute real life microcode of thousands of lines, allowing formal methods to become an integral part of microcode validation in Intel Corporation. Tamarah Arons, Elad Elster, Shlomit Ozer, Jonathan Shalev, Eli Singerman |
DATE | 1 |
| 2005 | Formal Verification of Backward Compatibility of Microcode
Tamarah Arons, Elad Elster, Limor Fix, Sela Mador-Haim, Michael Mishaeli, Jonathan Shalev, Eli Singerman, Andreas Tiemeyer, Moshe Y. Vardi, Lenore D. Zuck |
CAV | 1 |
| 2004 | Verification of an Advanced mips-Type Out-of-Order Execution Algorithm
Tamarah Arons |
CAV | 1 |
| 2003 | Parameterized Verification by Probabilistic Abstraction
Tamarah Arons, Amir Pnueli, Lenore D. Zuck |
FoSSaCS | 1 |
| 2001 | Using Timestamping and History Variables to Verify Sequential Consistency
Tamarah Arons |
CAV | 1 |
| 2001 | Parameterized Verification with Automatically Computed Inductive Assertions
Tamarah Arons, Amir Pnueli, Sitvanit Ruah, Jiazhao Xu, Lenore D. Zuck |
CAV | 1 |
| 2000 | A Comparison of Two Verification Methods for Speculative Instruction Execution
Tamarah Arons, Amir Pnueli |
TACAS | 1 |
| 1999 | A Methodology for the Verification of a "System on Chip"abstractThis paper summarizes the verification effort of a complex ASIC designated to be an “all in one” ISDN network router. This ASIC is unique because it actually consists of many independent components, called “cores ” (including the processor). The integration of these components onto one chip results in an ISOC (Integrated System On a Chip). The complexity of verifying an ISOC is virtually impossible without a proper methodology. This paper presents the methodology developed for verifying the router. In particular, the verification method as well as the tools that were built to execute this method are presented. Finally, a summary of the verification results is given. Daniel Geist, Giora Biran, Tamarah Arons, Michael Slavkin, Yvgeny Nustov, Monica Farkas, Karen Holtz, Andy Long, Steve Barret |
DAC | 3 |
| 1998 | Verification of Data-Insensitive CIrcuits: An In-Order-Retirement Case Study
Amir Pnueli, Tamarah Arons |
FMCAD | 2 |