EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
T. William Mather
dblp:73/8366
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Multi-agent systems · 71% Robot navigation and mapping · 12% Robot manipulation · 12% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-robot systems |
0.3 | 2 | 2012 | Ensemble synthesis of distributed control and communication strategies · ICRA 2012 Towards dynamic team formation for robot ensembles · ICRA 2010 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
task allocation |
0.3 | 2 | 2012 | Ensemble synthesis of distributed control and communication strategies · ICRA 2012 Towards dynamic team formation for robot ensembles · ICRA 2010 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › cooperative manipulation
cooperative robot control |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Robotic manifold tracking of coherent structures in flows · ICRA 2012 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › target tracking
cooperative tracking |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Robotic manifold tracking of coherent structures in flows · ICRA 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
distributed control |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Ensemble synthesis of distributed control and communication strategies · ICRA 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › task allocation
dynamic allocation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Ensemble synthesis of distributed control and communication strategies · ICRA 2012 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › multi-robot control
decentralized control |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Robotic manifold tracking of coherent structures in flows · ICRA 2012 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Ensemble synthesis of distributed control and communication strategies · ICRA 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
collective behavior |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Towards dynamic team formation for robot ensembles · ICRA 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic hybrid systems · 0.3feedback strategies · 0.3prediction and correction · 0.1markov jump processes · 0.1markov jump process · 0.1local sensing · 0.1collaborative control · 0.1macroscopic analytical model · 0.1agent-based simulation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Robotic manifold tracking of coherent structures in flowsabstractTracking Lagrangian coherent structures in dynamical systems is important for many applications such as oceanography and weather prediction. In this paper, we present a collaborative robotic control strategy designed to track stable and unstable manifolds. The technique does not require global information about the fluid dynamics, and is based on local sensing, prediction, and correction. The collaborative control strategy is implemented on a team of three robots to track coherent structures and manifolds on static flows as well as a noisy time-dependent model of a wind-driven double-gyre often seen in the ocean. We present simulation and experimental results and discuss theoretical guarantees of the collaborative tracking strategy. M. Ani Hsieh, Eric Forgoston, T. William Mather, Ira B. Schwartz |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2012 | Ensemble synthesis of distributed control and communication strategiesabstractWe present an ensemble framework for the design of distributed control and communication strategies for the dynamic allocation of a team of robots to a set of tasks. In this work, we assume individual robot controllers are sequentially composed of individual task controllers. This assumption enables the representation of the robot ensemble dynamics as a class of stochastic hybrid systems that can be modeled as continuous-time Markov jump processes where feedback strategies can be derived to control the team's distribution across the tasks. Since the distributed implementation of these feedback strategy requires the estimation of certain population variables, we show how the ensemble model can be expanded to incorporate the dynamics of the information exchange. This then enables us to optimize the individual robot control policies to ensure overall system robustness given some likelihood of resource failures. We consider the assignment of a team of homogeneous robots to a collection of spatially distributed tasks and validate our approach via high-fidelity simulations. T. William Mather, M. Ani Hsieh |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2010 | Towards dynamic team formation for robot ensemblesabstractWe present an investigation of dynamic team formation strategies for robot ensembles performing a collection of single and two-robot tasks. Specifically, we consider the abstract “stick and pebble” problem, as a variation of the “stick pulling” problem discussed in the literature. We present a formulation of the dynamic team formation problem that is independent of ensemble size and develop a macroscopic analytical description of the ensemble dynamics. The macroscopic model is then used to determine the optimal teaming strategy for two different performance metrics. We present agent-based simulation results to support the validity of our macroscopic analysis. T. William Mather, M. Ani Hsieh, Emilio Frazzoli |
ICRA | 1 |