Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

William A. Schmitt

dblp:73/952 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 93% Computational science and engineering · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.012002
Mapping physiological states from microarray expression measurements · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.012002
Determination of minimum sample size and discriminatory expression patterns in microarray data · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology
power analysis
0.012002
Determination of minimum sample size and discriminatory expression patterns in microarray data · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics
sample size determination
0.012002
Determination of minimum sample size and discriminatory expression patterns in microarray data · Bioinform. 2002
Computational science and engineering
discriminant analysis
0.012002
Determination of minimum sample size and discriminatory expression patterns in microarray data · Bioinform. 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fisher discriminant analysis · 0.1power analysis · 0.0linear projection · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Determination of minimum sample size and discriminatory expression patterns in microarray data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Transcriptional profiling using microarrays can reveal important information about cellular and tissue expression phenotypes, but these measurements are costly and time consuming. Additionally, tissue sample availability poses further constraints on the number of arrays that can be analyzed in connection with a particular disease or state of interest. It is therefore important to provide a method for the determination of the minimum number of microarrays required to separate, with statistical reliability, distinct disease states or other physiological differences. RESULTS: Power analysis was applied to estimate the minimum sample size required for two-class and multi-class discrimination. The power analysis algorithm calculates the appropriate sample size for discrimination of phenotypic subtypes in a reduced dimensional space obtained by Fisher discriminant analysis (FDA). This approach was tested by applying the algorithm to existing data sets for estimation of the minimum sample size required for drawing certain conclusions on multi-class distinction with statistical reliability. It was confirmed that when the minimum number of samples estimated from power analysis is used, group means in the FDA discrimination space are statistically different. CONTACT: [email protected]
Daehee Hwang, William A. Schmitt, George Stephanopoulos, Gregory Stephanopoulos
Bioinform.2
2002 Mapping physiological states from microarray expression measurements
abstract
MOTIVATION: The increasing use of DNA microarrays to probe cell physiology requires methods for visualizing different expression phenotypes and explicitly connecting individual genes to discriminating expression features. Such methods should be robust and maintain biological interpretability. RESULTS: We propose a method for the mapping of the physiological state of cells and tissues from multidimensional expression data such as those obtained with DNA microarrays. The method uses Fisher discriminant analysis to create a linear projection of gene expression measurements that maximizes the separation of different sample classes. Relative to other typical classification methods, this method provides insights into the discriminating characteristics of expression measurements in terms of the contribution of individual genes to the definition of distinct physiological states. This projection method also facilitates visualization of classification results in a reduced dimensional space. Examples from four different cases demonstrate the ability of the method to produce well-separated groups in the projection space and to identify important genes for defining physiological states. The method can be augmented to also include data from the proteomic and metabolic phenotypes and can be useful in disease diagnosis, drug screening and bioprocessing applications.
Gregory Stephanopoulos, Daehee Hwang, William A. Schmitt, Jatin Misra, George Stephanopoulos
Bioinform.3