Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Niels Kammerer

dblp:73/9543 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Usable security · 50% Web and mobile security · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and mobile security › phishing
phishing prevention		 0.112011
Does MoodyBoard make internet use more secure?: evaluating an ambient security visualization tool · CHI 2011
Usable security
security visualization		 0.112011
Does MoodyBoard make internet use more secure?: evaluating an ambient security visualization tool · CHI 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Does MoodyBoard make internet use more secure?: evaluating an ambient security visualization tool
abstract
Internet users are targets for ever-advancing phishing- and other attacks. The risks are, for example, to disclose credit card information or passwords to unauthorized instances. One approach to help users with insecure situations is provided by MoodyBoard, which uses ambient information to highlight potential risks. In this paper, we present findings from an evaluation of this system. Two user studies were conducted in order to find out whether an ambient security tool can protect users during sensitive tasks. We designed a pilot study to find out whether users understand the warnings and a security study to see if it helps to protect users from phishing attacks. Results show that MoodyBoard users behaved significantly more secure.
Alexander De Luca, Bernhard Frauendienst, Max-Emanuel Maurer, Julian Seifert, Doris Hausen, Niels Kammerer, Heinrich Hußmann
 CHI6