Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vishesh Karwa

dblp:74/10355 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
subgraph counting
0.212014
Private Analysis of Graph Structure · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2014
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.212014
Private Analysis of Graph Structure · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2014
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private graph algorithms
edge differential privacy
0.212014
Private Analysis of Graph Structure · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2014
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving data processing
graph data privacy
0.112011
Private Analysis of Graph Structure · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.012011
Private Analysis of Graph Structure · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random graph model analysis · 0.4local sensitivity analysis · 0.4differential privacy · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Finite Sample Differentially Private Confidence Intervals
abstract
We study the problem of estimating finite sample confidence intervals of the mean of a normal population under the constraint of differential privacy. We consider both the known and unknown variance cases and construct differentially private algorithms to estimate confidence intervals. Crucially, our algorithms guarantee a finite sample coverage, as opposed to an asymptotic coverage. Unlike most previous differentially private algorithms, we do not require the domain of the samples to be bounded. We also prove lower bounds on the expected size of any differentially private confidence set showing that our the parameters are optimal up to polylogarithmic factors.
Vishesh Karwa, Salil P. Vadhan
ITCS1
2014 Differentially Private Exponential Random Graphs
Vishesh Karwa, Aleksandra B. Slavkovic, Pavel N. Krivitsky
Privacy in Statistical Databases1
2014 Private Analysis of Graph Structure
abstract
We present efficient algorithms for releasing useful statistics about graph data while providing rigorous privacy guarantees. Our algorithms work on datasets that consist of relationships between individuals, such as social ties or email communication. The algorithms satisfy edge differential privacy , which essentially requires that the presence or absence of any particular relationship be hidden. Our algorithms output approximate answers to subgraph counting queries . Given a query graph H , for example, a triangle, k -star, or k -triangle, the goal is to return the number of edge-induced isomorphic copies of H in the input graph. The special case of triangles was considered by Nissim et al. [2007] and a more general investigation of arbitrary query graphs was initiated by Rastogi et al. [2009]. We extend the approach of Nissim et al. to a new class of statistics, namely k -star queries. We also give algorithms for k -triangle queries using a different approach based on the higher-order local sensitivity. For the specific graph statistics we consider (i.e., k -stars and k -triangles), we significantly improve on the work of Rastogi et al.: our algorithms satisfy a stronger notion of privacy that does not rely on the adversary having a particular prior distribution on the data, and add less noise to the answers before releasing them. We evaluate the accuracy of our algorithms both theoretically and empirically, using a variety of real and synthetic datasets. We give explicit, simple conditions under which these algorithms add a small amount of noise. We also provide the average-case analysis in the Erdős-Rényi-Gilbert G ( n , p ) random graph model. Finally, we give hardness results indicating that the approach Nissim et al. used for triangles cannot easily be extended to k -triangles (hence justifying our development of a new algorithmic approach).
Vishesh Karwa, Sofya Raskhodnikova, Adam D. Smith 0001, Grigory Yaroslavtsev
ACM Trans. Database Syst.1
2012 Differentially Private Graphical Degree Sequences and Synthetic Graphs
Vishesh Karwa, Aleksandra B. Slavkovic
Privacy in Statistical Databases1
2011 Private Analysis of Graph Structure
Vishesh Karwa, Sofya Raskhodnikova, Adam D. Smith 0001, Grigory Yaroslavtsev
Proc. VLDB Endow.1