Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Juliet Fiss
dblp:74/10569
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 39% Computational photography and imaging · 27% Image and video processing · 27% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 77% Web and social media mining · 23% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing
image matting |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Light field layer matting · CVPR 2015 |
Computational photography and imaging
light field imaging |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Light field layer matting · CVPR 2015 |
Information retrieval › search interfaces
search result presentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Mining text snippets for images on the web · KDD 2014 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › cross-modal alignment
text-image alignment |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Mining text snippets for images on the web · KDD 2014 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › multimedia analysis › multimedia collection analysis › image collection analysis
photo selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Candid portrait selection from video · ACM Trans. Graph. 2011 |
Rendering
novel view synthesis |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Light field layer matting · CVPR 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine-learned relevance scoring · 0.4combinatorial subset selection · 0.4regression · 0.2feature extraction · 0.2cross-validation · 0.2alpha matting · 0.24d light field representation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Light field layer mattingabstractIn this paper, we use matting to separate foreground layers from light fields captured with a plenoptic camera. We represent the input 4D light field as a 4D background light field, plus a 2D spatially varying foreground color layer with alpha. Our method can be used to both pull a foreground matte and estimate an occluded background light field. Our method assumes that the foreground layer is thin and fronto-parallel, and is composed of a limited set of colors that are distinct from the background layer colors. Our method works well for thin, translucent, and blurred foreground occluders. Our representation can be used to render the light field from novel views, handling disocclusions while avoiding common artifacts. Juliet Fiss, Brian Curless, Richard Szeliski |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2014 | Refocusing plenoptic images using depth-adaptive splattingabstractIn this paper, we propose a simple, novel plane sweep technique for refocusing plenoptic images. Rays are projected directly from the raw plenoptic image captured on the sensor into the output image plane, without computing intermediate representations such as subaperture views or epipolar images. Interpolation is performed in the output image plane using splatting. The splat kernel for each ray is adjusted adaptively, based on the refocus depth and an estimate of the depth at which that ray intersects the scene. This adaptive interpolation method antialiases out-of-focus regions, while keeping in-focus regions sharp. We test the proposed method on images from a Lytro camera and compare our results with those from the Lytro SDK. Additionally, we provide a thorough discussion of our calibration and preprocessing pipeline for this camera. Juliet Fiss, Brian Curless, Richard Szeliski |
ICCP | 1 |
| 2014 | Mining text snippets for images on the webabstractImages are often used to convey many different concepts or illustrate many different stories. We propose an algorithm to mine multiple diverse, relevant, and interesting text snippets for images on the web. Our algorithm scales to all images on the web. For each image, all webpages that contain it are considered. The top-K text snippet selection problem is posed as combinatorial subset selection with the goal of choosing an optimal set of snippets that maximizes a combination of relevancy, interestingness, and diversity. The relevancy and interestingness are scored by machine learned models. Our algorithm is run at scale on the entire image index of a major search engine resulting in the construction of a database of images with their corresponding text snippets. We validate the quality of the database through a large-scale comparative study. We showcase the utility of the database through two web-scale applications: (a) augmentation of images on the web as webpages are browsed and (b)~an image browsing experience (similar in spirit to web browsing) that is enabled by interconnecting semantically related images (which may not be visually related) through shared concepts in their corresponding text snippets. Anitha Kannan, Simon Baker, Krishnan Ramnath, Juliet Fiss, Dahua Lin, Lucy Vanderwende, Rizwan Ansary, Ashish Kapoor, Qifa Ke, Matthew Uyttendaele, Xin-Jing Wang, Lei Zhang 0001 |
KDD | 4 |
| 2011 | Candid portrait selection from videoabstractIn this paper, we train a computer to select still frames from video that work well as candid portraits. Because of the subjective nature of this task, we conduct a human subjects study to collect ratings of video frames across multiple videos. Then, we compute a number of features and train a model to predict the average rating of a video frame. We evaluate our model with cross-validation, and show that it is better able to select quality still frames than previous techniques, such as simply omitting frames that contain blinking or motion blur, or selecting only smiles. We also evaluate our technique qualitatively on videos that were not part of our validation set, and were taken outdoors and under different lighting conditions. Juliet Fiss, Aseem Agarwala, Brian Curless |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 1 |