Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter Mills

dblp:74/1910 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0001-5403-8459ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 78% Electronic design automation · 22%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › data distribution
data decomposition
0.012000
A Design Methodology for Data-Parallel Applications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2000
Parallel and multicore computing
data-parallel programming
0.012000
A Design Methodology for Data-Parallel Applications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2000
Electronic design automation
design methodology
0.012000
A Design Methodology for Data-Parallel Applications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2000
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models
0.012000
A Design Methodology for Data-Parallel Applications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2000
Parallel and multicore computing
load balancing
0.012000
A Design Methodology for Data-Parallel Applications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2000
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel programming models
message passing
0.012000
A Design Methodology for Data-Parallel Applications · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cost-benefit analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Retrieving Ice Concentration From SMOS
abstract
The Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) Ice project explored the potential of retrieving sea-ice information from the SMOS satellite, a polar-orbiting L-band radiometer successfully launched in November 2009. Toward this end, radiance measurements were collected over the Northern Baltic during the Pol-Ice campaign. We test a simple ice-concentration retrieval algorithm on these data and compare the results with ARTIST Sea Ice (ASI) maps derived from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer on the Earth Observing System. All operational ice-concentration algorithms are based on the same principle which, for the campaign data, reduces to a linear scaling of the radiances because, effectively, only one channel was available. Because of biases introduced by the different footprint sizes of the two radiometers (airborne and satellite), the linear flight path, and pilot selection of preferred surface type, Pol-Ice and ASI concentrations were compared using three different levels of averaging. In the first case, the individual measurements from the airborne radiometer were compared with interpolated ASI values; in the second, they were averaged over the pixels in the ASI maps; and in the third, they were averaged by binning the ASI values in 1% intervals. The correlations were 0.59, 0.67, and 0.76, respectively. Because of the unique operating principle of SMOS, each ground point will be viewed at multiple effective angles within a short time span. It is proposed to exploit this extra information by interpolating to a single effective viewing angle.
Peter Mills, Georg C. Heygster
IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Lett.1
2011 Sea Ice Emissivity Modeling at L-Band and Application to 2007 Pol-Ice Campaign Field Data
abstract
Sea ice emissivity models for the L-band frequency range are described and then tested on Pol-Ice campaign field measurements. Pol-Ice was conducted in March 2007 in the Northern Baltic in preparation for the launch of the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) instrument, a satellite microwave radiometer operating at 1.4 GHz. The campaign comprised airborne measurements from the EMIRAD L-band radiometer and the E-M Bird ice thickness meter. Because of the translucency of sea ice at L-band, it is hoped that SMOS will render information on ice thickness. Three variations on radiative transfer are used to model EMIRAD brightness temperatures from collocated E-M Bird measurements: a single plane-parallel model, an ensemble of such models, and a ridged Monte Carlo model based on geometric optics that includes both the top- and bottom-surface topography. All three models accurately account for the instrument antenna pattern, relevant to satellite-mounted radiometers that sample a large and heterogeneous area. Because of ice growth processes, salinity and, by extension, permittivity are partial functions of ice thickness; thus, the models are further refined so that permittivity varies with ice thickness, which was necessary to correctly model the polarization difference. Other issues related to effective permittivities, an intermediate quantity in the models, are discussed. Analysis of partial correlations shows that ice ridging makes a significant contribution to the measured signal, commending further study using scattering models that are more appropriate to the scale of the ridging relative to the wavelength.
Peter Mills, Georg C. Heygster
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.1
2000 A Design Methodology for Data-Parallel Applications
abstract
A methodology for the design and development of data-parallel applications and components is presented. Data-parallelism is a well understood form of parallel computation, yet developing simple applications can involve substantial efforts to express the problem in low level notations. We describe a process of software development for data-parallel applications starting from high level specifications, generating repeated refinements of designs to match different architectural models and performance constraints, enabling a development activity with cost benefit analysis. Primary issues are algorithm choice, correctness, and efficiency, followed by data decomposition, load balancing, and message passing coordination. Development of a data-parallel multitarget tracking application is used as a case study, showing the progression from high to low level refinements. We conclude by describing tool support for the process.
Lars S. Nyland, Jan F. Prins, Allen Goldberg, Peter Mills
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.4
1996 G-MING: A High Performance Multi-Service Telecommunications Infrastructure for the Greater Manchester Educational Community
Peter Mills, Jim Strom
Comput. Networks ISDN Syst.1