Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kenneth Man-kam Yip

dblp:74/1994 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 7 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Automated reasoning and model checking · 45% Logic in computer science · 30% Information theory · 20%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
qualitative reasoning
0.021996
Model Simplification by Asymptotic Order of Magnitude Reasoning · Artif. Intell. 1996
Understanding Complex Dynamics by Visual and Symbolic Reasoning · Artif. Intell. 1991
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › qualitative reasoning
order of magnitude reasoning
0.011996
Model Simplification by Asymptotic Order of Magnitude Reasoning · Artif. Intell. 1996
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.011991
Understanding Complex Dynamics by Visual and Symbolic Reasoning · Artif. Intell. 1991
Information theory
asymptotic analysis
0.011996
Model Simplification by Asymptotic Order of Magnitude Reasoning · Artif. Intell. 1996
Logic in computer science › semantics
computational semantics
0.011985
Tense, Aspect and the Cognitive Representation of Time · ACL 1985
Computational science and engineering › dynamical systems › nonlinear dynamics
chaotic dynamics
0.011991
Understanding Complex Dynamics by Visual and Symbolic Reasoning · Artif. Intell. 1991
Computational science and engineering › dynamical systems
nonlinear dynamics
0.011991
Understanding Complex Dynamics by Visual and Symbolic Reasoning · Artif. Intell. 1991
Computational complexity › constraint satisfaction
constraint propagation
0.011985
Tense, Aspect and the Cognitive Representation of Time · ACL 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model simplification · 0.0asymptotic order of magnitude reasoning · 0.0order-of-magnitude reasoning · 0.0symbolic reasoning · 0.0numerical methods · 0.0geometric reasoning · 0.0agent-based simulation · 0.0numerical simulation · 0.0constraint propagation algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Model Simplification by Asymptotic Order of Magnitude Reasoning
Kenneth Man-kam Yip
Artif. Intell.1
1993 Model Simplification by Asymptotic Order of Magnitude Reasoning
Kenneth Man-kam Yip
AAAI1
1991 Understanding Complex Dynamics by Visual and Symbolic Reasoning
abstract
Professional scientists and engineers routinely use nonverbal reasoning processes and graphical representations to organize their thoughts and as part of the process of solving otherwise verbally presented problems. This paper presents a computational theory and an implemented system that capture some aspects of this style of reasoning. The system, consisting of a suite of computer programs collectively known as KAM, uses numerical methods as a means to shift back and forth between symbolic and geometric methods of reasoning. The KAM program has three novel features: (1) it articulates the idea that “visual mechanisms are useful for problem solving” into a workable computational theory, (2) it applies the approach to a domain of great technical difficulty, the field of complex nonlinear chaotic dynamics, and (3) it demonstrates the power of the approach by solving problems of real interest to working scientists and engineers.
Kenneth Man-kam Yip
Artif. Intell.1
1988 Generating Global Behaviors using Deep knowledge of Local Dynamics
Kenneth Man-kam Yip
AAAI1
1987 Extracting Qualitative Dynamics from Numerical Experiments
Kenneth Man-kam Yip
AAAI1
1985 Tense, Aspect and the Cognitive Representation of Time
abstract
This paper explores the relationships between a computational theory of temporal representation (as developed by James Allen) and a formal linguistic theory of tense (as developed by Norbert Hornstein) and aspect. It aims to provide explicit answers to four fundamental questions: (1) what is the computational justification for the primitives of a linguistic theory; (2) what is the computational explanation of the formal grammatical constraints: (3) what are the processing constraints imposed on the learnability and markedness of these theoretical constructs: and (4) what are the constraints that a linguistic theory imposes on. representations. We show that one can effectively exploit the interface between the language faculty and the cognitive faculties by using linguistic constraints to determine restructions on the cognitive representations and vice versa.Three main results are obtained: (1) We derive an explanation of an observed grammatical constraint on tense .. the Linear Order Constraint .. from the information monotonicity property of the constraint propagation algorithm of Allen's temporal system: (2) We formulate a principle of markedness for the basic tense structures based on the computational efficiency of the temporal representations: and (3) We show Allen's interval-based temporal system is not arbitrary. but it can be used to explair, independently motivated linguistic constraints on tense and aspect interpretations.We also claim that the methodology of research developed in this study .. "cross-level" investigation of independently motivated formal grammatical theory and computational models .. is a powerful paradigm with which to attack representational problems in basic cognitive domains, e.g., space. time, causality, etc.
Kenneth Man-kam Yip
ACL1
1985 Tense, Aspect, and Cognitive Representation of Time
Kenneth Man-kam Yip
IJCAI1