Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William E. Stephens

dblp:74/2692 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › modulation
line coding
0.011995
Line Code Selection for 155.52 Mb/s Data Transmission on Category 5 Cable Plant · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1995
Physical-layer communications › digital transmission systems › wireline communication
unshielded twisted-pair transmission
0.011995
Line Code Selection for 155.52 Mb/s Data Transmission on Category 5 Cable Plant · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1995
Physical-layer communications › signal processing for communications
transceiver design
0.011995
Line Code Selection for 155.52 Mb/s Data Transmission on Category 5 Cable Plant · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

experimental link · 0.0analytical modeling · 0.0BER measurement · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Feasibility of Converting the Medicare Synthetic Public Use Data Into a Standardized Data Model for Clinical Research Informatics
Mark D. Danese, Erica A. Voss, Jennifer Duryea, Michelle Gleeson, Ryan Duryea, Amy Matcho, Donald O'Hara, William E. Stephens, Adler J. Perotte, Lee Evans, Christian G. Reich
AMIA8
1995 Line Code Selection for 155.52 Mb/s Data Transmission on Category 5 Cable Plant
abstract
EMI/EMC is a dominant problem encountered in high bit-rate (>100 Mb/s) transmission over unshielded twisted-pair cable (UTP) which leads to a novel set of line-code dependent tradeoffs affecting transceiver and cable plant complexity. To understand the tradeoffs, the authors examined the factors affecting RF emissions and susceptibility in both trellis-configured cable plant models and installed cable plant. An analytical model is presented that describes mode conversion by discontinuities in multi-pair UTP cable plant. Termination of the three dominant propagating modes produces consistently lower radiated emissions than other standard cable termination procedures. Cable plant parameters which predict good transmission do not assure satisfactory EMI performance. Radiated emissions from the trellis model occur in broad bands at 43, 53, 60, 70, and 80 MHz, and show a positive correlation with the transmit signal spectrum. For a given transmit level at 155 Mb/s, the emissions with MLT3 and BPR1 were 8-13 dB (10 dB typ) and 4-20 dB (13 dB typ) below NRZ levels, respectively. The authors also compared the performance of NRZ, MLT3, BPR1, and BPR4 line codes in an experimental 155 Mb/s link with 100 m of UTP5 by measuring the BER sensitivity to both injected noise and pseudo-random data sequence length. When the measured receiver penalty associated with three levels is included, MLT3, BPR1, and BPR4 offer 5-15 dB better performance over NRZ at 155 Mb/s, although implementation complexity is greater.
Thomas C. Banwell, William E. Stephens
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.2