Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Nitin Srimal

dblp:74/2839 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › timing analysis › static timing analysis
common path pessimism removal		 0.212016
Statistical path tracing in timing graphs · DAC 2016
Electronic design automation › timing analysis
static timing analysis		 0.212016
Statistical path tracing in timing graphs · DAC 2016
Electronic design automation › timing analysis
statistical timing analysis		 0.112016
Statistical path tracing in timing graphs · DAC 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical path tracing · 0.2deterministic path tracing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Statistical path tracing in timing graphs
abstract
Path tracing is a key requirement in providing various functionalities in a Static Timing Analysis (STA) tool. With growing design sizes and advancements in STA techniques like statistical timing analysis, path tracing techniques need to be more efficient and accurate. Naïve extensions of path tracing techniques for statistical timing analysis are found to be inefficient and inaccurate. In this paper, we present a novel Statistical Path Tracing (SPT) approach and illustrate its application in Common Path Pessimism Removal (CPPR). We demonstrate that SPT is more efficient and accurate when compared to a Deterministic Path Tracing (DPT) approach.
Vasant Rao, Debjit Sinha, Nitin Srimal, Prabhat K. Maurya
 DAC3