Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Susan E. Andrews

dblp:74/3249 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 67% Image and video processing · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing › shape descriptor
fourier descriptors
0.011988
Three-Dimensional Shape Analysis Using Moments and Fourier Descriptors · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1988
Image and video processing › image representation
moment-based shape description
0.011988
Three-Dimensional Shape Analysis Using Moments and Fourier Descriptors · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1988
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis
0.011988
Three-Dimensional Shape Analysis Using Moments and Fourier Descriptors · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

standard moments · 0.0moment invariants · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1988 Three-Dimensional Shape Analysis Using Moments and Fourier Descriptors
abstract
A procedure for using moment-based feature vectors to identify a three-dimensional object from a two-dimensional image recorded at an arbitrary viewing angle and range is presented. A moment form called standard moments, rather than the usual moment invariants, is considered. A standard six-airplane experiment was used to compare different techniques. Fourier descriptors and moment invariants were both compared to the present scheme for normalized moments. Various experiments were conducted using mixtures of silhouette and boundary moments and different normalization techniques. Standard moments gave slightly better results than Fourier descriptors for this experiment; both of these techniques were much better than moment invariants.>
Anthony P. Reeves, Richard J. Prokop, Susan E. Andrews, Frank P. Kuhl
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3