Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Martin Eisenacher

dblp:74/4050 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2687-7444ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics
0.322016
PAA: an R/bioconductor package for biomarker discovery with protein microarrays · Bioinform. 2016
Mass Analysis Peptide Sequence Prediction (MAPSP) · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomarker discovery
0.212016
PAA: an R/bioconductor package for biomarker discovery with protein microarrays · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
feature selection
0.212016
PAA: an R/bioconductor package for biomarker discovery with protein microarrays · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
protein microarray data analysis
0.212016
PAA: an R/bioconductor package for biomarker discovery with protein microarrays · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support vector machine · 0.2recursive feature elimination · 0.2ensemble feature selection · 0.2mass spectrometry · 0.1combinatorial prediction · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ProtGraph: a tool for the quick and comprehensive exploration and exploitation of the peptide search space derived from protein sequence databases using graphs
abstract
Due to computational resource limitations, in mass spectrometry based proteomics only a limited set of peptide sequences is used for the matching against measured spectra. We present an approach to represent proteins by graphs and allow not only the canonical sequences but also known isoforms and annotated amino acid variations, e.g. originating from genomic mutations, and further common protein sequence features contained in Uniprot KB or other protein databases. Our C++ and Python implementation enables a groundbreaking comprehensive characterization of the peptide search space, encompassing for the first time all available annotations in a protein database (in combination more than $10^{200}$ possibilities). Additionally, it can be used to quickly extract the relevant subset of the search space for peptide to spectrum matching, e.g. filtering by the peptide mass. We demonstrate the advantages and innovative findings of our implementation compared to previous workflows by re-analysing publicly available datasets.
Dominik Lux, Katrin Marcus-Alic, Martin Eisenacher, Julian Uszkoreit
Briefings Bioinform.3
2021 Implementing FAIR data management within the German Network for Bioinformatics Infrastructure (de.NBI) exemplified by selected use cases
abstract
This article describes some use case studies and self-assessments of FAIR status of de.NBI services to illustrate the challenges and requirements for the definition of the needs of adhering to the FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable) data principles in a large distributed bioinformatics infrastructure. We address the challenge of heterogeneity of wet lab technologies, data, metadata, software, computational workflows and the levels of implementation and monitoring of FAIR principles within the different bioinformatics sub-disciplines joint in de.NBI. On the one hand, this broad service landscape and the excellent network of experts are a strong basis for the development of useful research data management plans. On the other hand, the large number of tools and techniques maintained by distributed teams renders FAIR compliance challenging.
Gerhard Mayer, Wolfgang Müller 0001, Karin Schork, Julian Uszkoreit, Andreas Weidemann, Ulrike Wittig, Maja Rey, Christian Quast, Janine Felden, Frank Oliver Glöckner, Matthias Lange 0001, Daniel Arend, Sebastian Beier, Astrid Junker, Uwe Scholz, Danuta Schüler, Hans A. Kestler, Daniel Wibberg, Alfred Pühler, Sven Twardziok, Roland Eils, Steve Hoffmann, Martin Eisenacher, Michael Turewicz
Briefings Bioinform.24
2019 A generally applicable lightweight method for calculating a value structure for tools and services in bioinformatics infrastructure projects
abstract
Sustainable noncommercial bioinformatics infrastructures are a prerequisite to use and take advantage of the potential of big data analysis for research and economy. Consequently, funders, universities and institutes as well as users ask for a transparent value model for the tools and services offered. In this article, a generally applicable lightweight method is described by which bioinformatics infrastructure projects can estimate the value of tools and services offered without determining exactly the total costs of ownership. Five representative scenarios for value estimation from a rough estimation to a detailed breakdown of costs are presented. To account for the diversity in bioinformatics applications and services, the notion of service-specific 'service provision units' is introduced together with the factors influencing them and the main underlying assumptions for these 'value influencing factors'. Special attention is given on how to handle personnel costs and indirect costs such as electricity. Four examples are presented for the calculation of the value of tools and services provided by the German Network for Bioinformatics Infrastructure (de.NBI): one for tool usage, one for (Web-based) database analyses, one for consulting services and one for bioinformatics training events. Finally, from the discussed values, the costs of direct funding and the costs of payment of services by funded projects are calculated and compared.
Gerhard Mayer, Christian Quast, Janine Felden, Matthias Lange 0001, Manuel Prinz, Alfred Pühler, Chris Lawerenz, Uwe Scholz, Frank Oliver Glöckner, Wolfgang Müller 0001, Katrin Marcus, Martin Eisenacher
Briefings Bioinform.12
2016 PAA: an R/bioconductor package for biomarker discovery with protein microarrays
abstract
UNLABELLED: The R/Bioconductor package Protein Array Analyzer (PAA) facilitates a flexible analysis of protein microarrays for biomarker discovery (esp., ProtoArrays). It provides a complete data analysis workflow including preprocessing and quality control, uni- and multivariate feature selection as well as several different plots and results tables to outline and evaluate the analysis results. As a main feature, PAA's multivariate feature selection methods are based on recursive feature elimination (e.g. SVM-recursive feature elimination, SVM-RFE) with stability ensuring strategies such as ensemble feature selection. This enables PAA to detect stable and reliable biomarker candidate panels. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PAA is freely available (BSD 3-clause license) from http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/PAA/ CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected].
Michael Turewicz, Maike Ahrens, Caroline May, Katrin Marcus, Martin Eisenacher
Bioinform.5
2015 Development of data representation standards by the human proteome organization proteomics standards initiative
abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the goals of the Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI) of the Human Proteome Organization, the methods that the PSI has employed to create data standards, the resulting output of the PSI, lessons learned from the PSI's evolution, and future directions and synergies for the group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PSI has 5 categories of deliverables that have guided the group. These are minimum information guidelines, data formats, controlled vocabularies, resources and software tools, and dissemination activities. These deliverables are produced via the leadership and working group organization of the initiative, driven by frequent workshops and ongoing communication within the working groups. Official standards are subjected to a rigorous document process that includes several levels of peer review prior to release. RESULTS: We have produced and published minimum information guidelines describing what information should be provided when making data public, either via public repositories or other means. The PSI has produced a series of standard formats covering mass spectrometer input, mass spectrometer output, results of informatics analysis (both qualitative and quantitative analyses), reports of molecular interaction data, and gel electrophoresis analyses. We have produced controlled vocabularies that ensure that concepts are uniformly annotated in the formats and engaged in extensive software development and dissemination efforts so that the standards can efficiently be used by the community.Conclusion In its first dozen years of operation, the PSI has produced many standards that have accelerated the field of proteomics by facilitating data exchange and deposition to data repositories. We look to the future to continue developing standards for new proteomics technologies and workflows and mechanisms for integration with other omics data types. Our products facilitate the translation of genomics and proteomics findings to clinical and biological phenotypes. The PSI website can be accessed at http://www.psidev.info.
Eric W. Deutsch, Juan P. Albar, Pierre-Alain Binz, Martin Eisenacher, Andrew R. Jones, Gerhard Mayer, Gilbert S. Omenn, Sandra E. Orchard, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno, Henning Hermjakob
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.4
2006 Mass Analysis Peptide Sequence Prediction (MAPSP)
abstract
UNLABELLED: The software tool MAPSP allows the combinatorial prediction of novel short peptides such as hormones with common sequence features. In addition, it assists in de novo sequencing in general. The tool was designed for use in conjunction with the analytical identification method of mass spectrometry (MS) and it can considerably speed-up the analysis of unknowns. AVAILABILITY: The web interface is freely available at http://mapsp.ifg.uni-muenster.de/
Martin Eisenacher, Jürgen de Braaf, Simone König
Bioinform.1