Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Christopher L. Lewis

dblp:74/4613 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
0000-0002-5728-9699ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Robot manipulation · 53% Motion planning and robot control · 47%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design › manipulator design
fault-tolerant manipulator
0.011997
Fault tolerant operation of kinematically redundant manipulators for locked joint failures · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1997
Robotics › Robot manipulation › assembly
cooperative assembly
0.011996
Trajectory generation for two robots cooperating to perform a task · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Robot manipulation
dual-arm manipulation
0.011996
Trajectory generation for two robots cooperating to perform a task · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › multi-robot control
multi-robot trajectory generation
0.011996
Trajectory generation for two robots cooperating to perform a task · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory planning
0.011996
Trajectory generation for two robots cooperating to perform a task · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
redundant manipulator control
0.011994
An Example of Failure Tolerant Operation of a Kinematically Redundant Manipulator · ICRA 1994
Robotics › Robot manipulation
redundant manipulator
0.011997
Fault tolerant operation of kinematically redundant manipulators for locked joint failures · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1997
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot kinematics
self-motion manifold
0.011997
Fault tolerant operation of kinematically redundant manipulators for locked joint failures · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bounding box estimation · 0.0artificial joint limits · 0.0redundancy resolution · 0.0jacobian formulation · 0.0workspace analysis · 0.0joint failure tolerance · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Fault tolerant operation of kinematically redundant manipulators for locked joint failures
abstract
This paper studies the degree to which the kinematic redundancy of a manipulator may be utilized for failure tolerance. A redundant manipulator is considered to be fault tolerant with respect to a given task if it is guaranteed to be capable of performing the task after any one of its joints has failed and is locked in place. A method is developed for determining the necessary constraints which insure the failure tolerance of a kinematically redundant manipulator with respect to a given critical task. This method is based on estimating the bounding boxes enclosing the self-motion manifolds for a given set of critical task points. The intersection of these bounding boxes provides a set of artificial joint limits that may guarantee the reachability of the task points after a joint failure. An algorithm for dealing with the special case of 2-D self-motion surfaces is presented, These techniques are illustrated on a PUMA 560 that is used for a 3-D Cartesian positioning task.
Christopher L. Lewis, Anthony A. Maciejewski
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.1
1996 Trajectory generation for two robots cooperating to perform a task
abstract
This paper formulates an algorithm for trajectory generation for two robots cooperating to perform an assembly task. Treating the two robots as a single redundant system, this paper derives two Jacobian matrices which relate the joint rates of the entire system to the relative motion of the grippers with respect to one another. The main advantage of this method over previous methods is that operations may be described in the coordinates of the assembly rather than in world coordinates. To join parts using this algorithm, the desired relative position is specified and the algorithm automatically determines where the robots perform the assembly. In the process of generating the trajectory, the dexterity of the highly redundant dual-robot system is taken advantage of to satisfy a variety of secondary constraints. Secondary constraints may include obstacle and joint limit avoidance and constraints to satisfy certain absolute position and orientation goals. The algorithm typically involves two phases. First the parts to be assembled are brought from an arbitrary initial configuration to an approach configuration. This phase uses a newly derived relative distance Jacobian formulation which inherently avoids collisions. Then, a more traditional Jacobian formulation is used to join the parts.
Christopher L. Lewis
ICRA1
1994 An Example of Failure Tolerant Operation of a Kinematically Redundant Manipulator
abstract
The high cost involved in the retrieval and repair of robotic manipulators used for remediating nuclear waste, processing hazardous chemicals, or for exploring space or the deep sea, places a premium on the reliability of the system as a whole. For such applications, kinematically redundant manipulators are inherently more reliable since the additional degrees of freedom (DOF) may compensate for a failed joint. In this work, a redundant manipulator is considered to be fault tolerant with respect to a given task if it is guaranteed to be capable of performing the task after any one of its joints has failed and is locked in place. A method is developed for insuring the failure tolerance of kinematically redundant manipulators with respect to a given critical task. Techniques are developed for analyzing the manipulator's workspace to find regions which are inherently suitable for critical tasks due to their relatively high level of failure tolerance. Then, constraints are imposed on the range of motion of the manipulator to guarantee that a given task is completable regardless of which joint fails. These concepts are illustrated for a PUMA 560 that is used for a three-dimensional positioning task.>
Christopher L. Lewis, Anthony A. Maciejewski
ICRA1