Gilad Adiv

dblp:74/5551 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 77% Video understanding and tracking · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
ambiguity analysis
0.011989
Inherent Ambiguities in Recovering 3-D Motion and Structure from a Noisy Flow Field · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1989
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
motion segmentation
0.011989
Inherent Ambiguities in Recovering 3-D Motion and Structure from a Noisy Flow Field · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1989
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › motion segmentation
optical flow segmentation
0.011985
Determining Three-Dimensional Motion and Structure from Optical Flow Generated by Several Moving Objects · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

noise modeling · 0.0mathematical analysis · 0.0rigid motion hypothesis testing · 0.0flow vector partitioning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 Inherent Ambiguities in Recovering 3-D Motion and Structure from a Noisy Flow Field
abstract
One of the major areas in research on dynamic scene analysis is recovering 3-D motion and structure from optical flow information. Two problems which may arise due to the presence of noise in the flow field are examined. First, motion parameters of the sensor or a rigidly moving object may be extremely difficult to estimate because there may exist a large set of significantly incorrect solutions which induce flow fields similar to the correct one. The second problem is in the decomposition of the environment into independently moving objects. Two such objects may induce optical flows which are compatible with the same motion parameters, and hence, there is no way to refute the hypothesis that these flows are generated by one rigid object. These ambiguities are inherent in the sense that they are algorithm-independent. Using a mathematical analysis, situations where these problems are likely to arise are characterized. A few examples demonstrate the conclusions. Constraints and parameters which can be recovered even in ambiguous situations are presented.>
Gilad Adiv
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1985 Determining Three-Dimensional Motion and Structure from Optical Flow Generated by Several Moving Objects
abstract
A new approach for the interpretation of optical flow fields is presented. The flow field, which can be produced by a sensor moving through an environment with several independently moving, rigid objects, is allowed to be sparse, noisy, and partially incorrect. The approach is based on two main stages. In the first stage, the flow field is partitioned into connected segments of flow vectors, where each segment is consistent with a rigid motion of a roughly planar surface. In the second stage, segments are grouped under the hypothesis that they are induced by a single, rigidly moving object. Each hypothesis is tested by searching for three-dimensional (3-D) motion parameters which are compatible with all the segments in the corresponding group. Once the motion parameters are recovered, the relative environmental depth can be estimated as well. Experiments based on real and simulated data are presented.
Gilad Adiv
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1